[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 60 (Thursday, April 29, 1999)]
[House]
[Page H2528]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTERPRETING THE VOTES ON KOSOVO
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. SHERMAN. Mr. Speaker, the subject that is on all of our minds is
the fight in Kosovo, and I would like to focus on properly interpreting
the votes of yesterday and looking to what our opportunities for
solving this crisis might be tomorrow.
Yesterday was a momentous day in the history of this House. First, we
voted with an over 60 percent vote that the President should not send
major ground forces into Kosovo without the approval of this House.
Now it is fair to point out that there were those on the other side.
They argued that Congress should not have a role in determining whether
ground forces are deployed. They argued that our enemies would tremble
in fear if they knew that one man, the President of the United States,
without the approval of Congress, could deploy 100,000 American
soldiers.
Mr. Speaker, I would tremble in fear, and the founders of this
republic would tremble in fear if it was thought that one man, without
the approval of the representatives of the people, could send 100,000
of our men and women into battle.
{time} 1400
But the fact that Congress insists upon approving in advance any
deployment of ground troops does not mean that Congress has prejudged
the issue.
Whether this country supports ground troops will depend, in my
opinion, on what we discover is happening to the men of Kosovo. Because
the refugees come out, the women, the children, the old men, but the
younger men and the middle-aged men are left behind. They may join the
KLA, and that is their right; they may be detained, and that is not
something that would cause incredible outrage. But if we discover, as
so many fear, that the men of Kosovo are being systematically
slaughtered, then there will be an outcry throughout Europe and the
United States, and it is possible that this House would authorize the
use of ground troops.
Second, and I think most telling, we voted 2-to-1, and that is very
rare in this House, by a 2-to-1 majority against ending all
hostilities. In doing so, we made it clear that America is not simply
going to shrug our shoulders and walk away. This is the most important
vote, and the vote that should be focused on by Belgrade.
The third vote, and, unfortunately, the vote that is getting the
press, was a vote of 213 to 213 as to whether this House would go on
record authorizing the air strikes.
Now, our own press is misinterpreting this vote, for it came just a
few hours after, by a 2-to-1 majority, my colleagues and I voted not to
stop what is going on now. We are not fools. What is going on now is an
air campaign, and our decision not to stop it should have been read as
a decision to go forward, at least for the present time.
But our own press, let alone the people in Belgrade, misinterpret the
last vote yesterday, because they fail to account for two groups that
voted against the resolution. One was a group, unfortunately, of some
of my Republican colleagues, who, while they support continuing the air
campaign, oppose saying anything good about anything President Clinton
has ever done. It is not a secret even in Belgrade that President
Clinton is not popular in the Republican Caucus, but that does mean
that this people or this Congress wants to stop action and let
Milosevic have his way.
Second, there were a group that I respect immensely who looked at
some of the hidden possible legal implications of that resolution. They
noticed that under the War Powers Act there may be a challenge to any
attempt by the President to put in ground troops without the approval
of this House, and that there is some judicial writing to the effect
that if Congress authorizes any kind of force, that we are in no
position to limit any other kind of force.
Properly interpreted, the votes of yesterday are clear: We should
proceed to work to put Kosovars back in their homes in security and
peace, and I addressed the House earlier on some of the more creative
ways to try to accomplish that.
____________________