[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 59 (Wednesday, April 28, 1999)]
[House]
[Page H2456]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MANAGED CARE REFORM
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Woolsey) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, 5 years ago the Republicans defeated
President Clinton's health care reform bill. They claimed it would
allow the Federal Government to interfere with the doctor-patient
relationship. Yet when the same relationship was threatened by a
corporate bureaucracy, Republicans last year offered legislation that
did nothing to protect the sanctity of choices made by doctors and
their patients.
It is the same story in the 106th Congress. Democrats have been
waiting 2 years to pass the Patients' Bill of Rights. Right now we are
ready to work to improve Americans' access to quality health care.
Right now, today, we are ready to make consumer protections real for
all Americans. Although many States have passed legislation making
patchwork protections State-by-State, this patchwork does not provide a
good fix for over 160 million Americans, Americans who need health care
reform.
While there are many fine managed care organizations in my own
district, and they are good, Sonoma and Marin Counties, California, on
the leading edge of health care reform, too many horror stories are all
too well known across this country. Doctors tell us real-life horror
stories about how they are gagged by insurance companies that dictate
what they can tell their patients about treatment options. They tell us
that a patient's treatment decisions are often overruled by a clerk and
that patients are denied a specialist's care. Or they tell us that
patients are shuttled out of a hospital before recovery is complete.
Americans know better. They want better treatment. Americans are
demanding that the Republican leadership take real action on health
care reform. But instead, the Republican legislation does not ensure
that patients have the right to even see a specialist. Nor does it
prevent insurance companies from continuing to send women who receive
mastectomies home early, against the advice of their physician. Lastly,
under the Republicans' bill, if patients are denied care, they would
not have the right to a meaningful external appeal. In other words,
they will not be able to sue.
In the final analysis, Mr. Speaker, the Republican bill will do
little to prevent medical decisions from being made by insurance
company clerks instead of by doctors and their patients.
What our health care system needs is the Democratic Patients' Bill of
Rights. This legislation will make sure that doctors and patients are
free to make decisions about patient health. The Patients' Bill of
Rights will ensure that patients have the right to openly discuss with
doctors their treatment options, have the right to receive uniform
information about their health plan, have the right to go to the
emergency room when the need arises, have the right to see a
specialist, and seek remedy from the courts when claims have been
unfairly denied.
It is time to put doctors and patients back in charge of our health
care system. I urge the Speaker and my colleagues to support the
Patients' Bill of Rights. I plead with the Republican leadership to
bring HMO health care reform to the House floor for debate.
____________________