[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 56 (Thursday, April 22, 1999)]
[House]
[Pages H2295-H2296]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EARTH DAY AND THE GREAT LAKES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Stupak) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. STUPAK. Mr. Speaker, this is Earth Day. This is the day when, in
the simplest of terms, we are supposed to say smokestacks are bad and
trees are good, that cars are bad and bicycles and buses are good.
Those of us concerned about the environment, of course, realize that
environmental issues have many more facets.
Consider the case of the Great Lakes. It was in October, Mr. Speaker,
that many of my colleagues gave unanimous approval to my resolution
which called on the President and the other body to act to prevent the
sale or diversion of Great Lakes water to foreign countries,
businesses, corporations and individuals.
{time} 1245
The House, speaking with one voice, asked that procedures be
established to guarantee that any sale or diversion of Great Lakes
water be fully negotiated and approved by representatives of the
Governments of the United States and Canada.
I want to remind our colleagues of this House action because, Mr.
Speaker, there is another threat to the Great Lakes, one which is posed
by the drilling of oil and gas in and under the waters of our Great
Lakes.
Let me take a few moments on this Earth Day to discuss water
diversion and drilling in the Great Lakes. First, let me pose these
questions: Are we being alarmists? Are diversion and drilling real
threats to one of the world's most valuable resources?
Consider, Mr. Speaker, these facts in terms of this potential impact
on the Great Lakes. Seventy percent of the Earth's surface is covered
with water, but 97.5 percent of that is sea water. Only 2.5 percent of
the surface water is fresh water. And nearly 70 percent of the fresh
water is frozen glacial water.
The Great Lakes contains 6 trillion gallons of fresh water, one-fifth
of the Earth's fresh water supply. The Great Lakes are home to 40
million people. One-quarter of Canada's population lives in the Great
Lakes basin.
The World Bank predicts that by the year 2025, more than 3 billion
people in 52 countries will suffer water shortages for drinking or
sanitation. More than 300 cities in China right now are experiencing
water shortages, and more than 100 are deemed to be in a condition of
acute water scarcity. Citizens of the United States and Canada use and
consume more than 100 gallons of water per day per person. The global
water demand is doubling every 21 years. Eighty percent of all fresh
water is used for agricultural purposes.
I would like to thank the Buffalo News for many of these facts, Mr.
Speaker. I present them as random facts because, like pieces of a
puzzle, they must be analyzed and arranged to see their importance.
The World Bank has studied this puzzle, and I call the attention of
my colleagues to a quote from a World Bank report, which the Buffalo
News used as the jump lead in a March 1999 story. The World Bank report
predicted, ``Wars of the next century will be fought over water.''
Are we really be willing alarmists? A company in Sault St. Marie,
Ontario, just one company, was given a permit to take up to 2.6 million
gallons per day of water for the next 5 years. I was joined by members
of the Ontario parliament and the New Democratic Party in bringing
public attention to this permit, which was then revoked by the Ontario
government.
But all fresh water will increasingly be eyed as a potential
commodity on the world market.
A Vancouver-based company, Global Water Corporation, has an agreement
with the Alaskan community of Sitka to take water from a lake and ship
it by tanker to China. The deal allows Global to take up to 5 billion
gallons a year for 30 years.
Now, I have spoken of just two companies. We know the market is
there. We can easily see the overhead is minimal, the market is
expanding, and the potential number of speculators and potential
shippers is unlimited.
Let me say that one more time, Mr. Speaker, that although I have
mentioned China twice in my remarks, I am not attempting to invoke it
as a threat to our own security. China is merely a customer who is in
need of water now. The world, the entire world, will be eyeing our
natural resources in the Great Lakes.
As of today, the sale and diversion of Great Lakes water and all
fresh water from North America remains unresolved. Following the House
vote on my resolution, the U.S. and Canada have asked the international
Joint Commission to study the issue of water diversion along the entire
border from Alaska to the St. Lawrence River. Their preliminary report
on diversion should be ready in about 5 months. A final report on our
joint water resources should be done early next year.
In the meantime, it is the policy of my home State of Michigan to
press for
[[Page H2296]]
drilling of oil and gas under the Great Lakes. Canada allows gas
drilling directly in the Great Lakes. Proponents of oil drilling in the
Great Lakes say the risk is minimal, small, tiny.
I say tiny is too big. A gallon of oil spilled in Lake Superior would
take 999 years to be cleared out by natural flow; Lake Michigan, 99
years; Lake Huron, 60 years.
So if my colleagues want to play Russian roulette, Mr. Speaker, how
many barrels on their gun would they be comfortable with? 100,000? One
million?
I wish my colleagues in the Nation a happy Earth Day, and I ask them
to consider my legislation to protect this valuable resource.
____________________