[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
[House]
[Page H529]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MAKING THE POSTAL SERVICE A PARTNER IN ASSURING LIVABILITY OF AMERICA'S
COMMUNITIES
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Pease). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. Blumenauer) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. BLUMENAUER. Mr. Speaker, one of the most exciting issues that has
arisen in this new year has been that of livable communities. It
received prominence in the President's State of the Union address. Just
this last week, on Friday, it was the feature article in the National
Journal. The Saturday New York Times front page political memo had
again an issue about livable communities. It is in large part an
expression of how government can be a partner with citizens, with the
business community, to try and really achieve what it is that Americans
deeply care about because, at heart, Americans care when their children
go out the door in the morning that they are safe, they want that
family to be economically secure, they want them to be healthy
physically and in terms of their environment.
One example of that partnership that can make a difference for
livable communities is the impact that the local post office has on
small and medium sized communities particularly around the country. The
post office is a symbol of how we connect to one another. The mail
collection and distribution is vitally important in terms of community
dynamic. Time and time again we find that post office on Main Street is
an anchor for that Main Street business activity; it is a source of
pride for people in the local communities; often it is a historic
structure.
Unfortunately, when it comes to the location of that service,
historic post offices around the country are being in some cases
removed from those historic downtown locations. In some cases they are
being, the post office simply has not been the type of neighbor that
our communities deserve, and it is sadly not unknown for the postal
service to not play by the same rules that the Federal Government
imposes on others.
I have a series of examples in my office where these historic
outposts have abandoned historic downtown locations to be located in a
strip mall at the edge of town, perhaps without any paved sidewalks.
Many communities in, for example, Portland, Oregon, where I am from,
there is a lot of work to try and plan for the future to be able to
promote a more livable community, and in fact the Oregon planning model
is heralded by some as the most advanced in the United States. But
despite the notoriety, despite the outreach, the Postal Service, for
instance, was completely clueless to the work that we have been doing
in our community to plan facilities for the next 50 years. It does not
have to be that way.
I am introducing legislation this week that would require the Post
Office to obey local land use and planning laws, to have them work with
the local communities before they make decisions that can have such a
wrenching affect on the fabric of community. I find it ironic that in
case after case the Post Office gives the public more input into what
version of the Elvis stamp it is going to produce than decisions that
really can be life and death for small town America.
We also have a provision in this bill that makes some minor technical
adjustments over what we had in the previous session of Congress
because we have been listening to people in the Postal Service and we
want to give them necessary flexibility. We do not want it to be a
straightjacket, but we do want it to be a model of how America can and
should work.
I would hope that, as we are promoting livable communities around the
country, that the Federal Government will lead by example, by acting
the way we want other actors and actresses to behave to promote more
livable communities. I would earnestly request that my colleagues join
me in sponsoring this legislation to make the Postal Service a full
partner in assuring the liveability of America's communities.
____________________