[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
[House]
[Page H486]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL DEBT IS NOT GOING DOWN UNDER PRESIDENT'S RECENTLY RELEASED
BUDGET
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 19, 1999, the gentleman from California (Mr. Herger) is
recognized during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. HERGER. Mr. Speaker, the White House would like the American
public and this Congress to believe that the national debt is going
down under their recently released fiscal year 2000 budget. But let us
look at page 389 of the President's very own budget from his Office of
Management and Budget. We see that the total national debt not only
does not go down but, in fact, is actually going up each year for the
next 5 years to the tune of $1.3 trillion.
Just last week I asked the President's Budget Director, Jacob Lew,
during a Committee on the Budget hearing, about this, and he was
evasive about the fact that the President's own budget calls for $1.3
trillion more in total debt on our children and grandchildren. I then
asked Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the next day during a Ways and
Means hearing, the same question, and Secretary Rubin refused to answer
a yes or no question about whether the total debt is actually going up.
Mr. Speaker, President Clinton and his administration are grossly
misleading the American people when they say the public debt is going
down. They are telling a half truth. The President and his
administration are correct in saying the public debt will go down, but
what they are not telling us is that the total debt, the debt held by
the government for Social Security and other trust funds, is going up
at an even faster rate, which makes the total debt go up by, yes, $1.3
trillion over the next 5 years. No matter if the debt is held by the
public or in various trust funds, it is still debt that must be paid
back at some future point.
The Clinton administration is doing future generations no favors in
this budget. More accurately, it is dishonest and disingenuous for the
Clinton-Gore administration to tout huge surpluses on one hand when, on
the other, their budget places even more debt on the shoulders of our
children and grandchildren. And as if forcing $1.3 trillion in more
debt on future generations was not enough, the President's budget
called for a net tax increase of $45.8 billion, and requests an
additional $150 billion in new spending over the next 5 years.
Mr. Speaker, it is the duty of this Congress to stop this assault on
our future generations and all taxpayers. I urge my colleagues to amend
the President's budget and to live within our means and to begin paying
down our $5.5 trillion national debt.
____________________