[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 147 (Thursday, October 15, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H10991-H10992]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HOW HISPANIC AMERICANS FARED
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Becerra) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BECERRA. Mr. Speaker, we are very close to the end of this
session, and perhaps it is fitting that we have an opportunity to try
to assess what has gone on this year. It happens that as the individual
who has been given the privilege to serve this Congress as the chairman
of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, a caucus which is composed of all
those Members of Congress of Hispanic heritage, that this year we have
an opportunity to talk a little bit about how Hispanic Americans have
fared in this Congress and through this White House in legislation and
in proposals administered by the executive branch of government.
And to help us in that we are fortunate. About 8 years ago many of
the national Hispanic organizations came together and formed an
umbrella organization, the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda. Back in
1991, when they formed, they decided to have a policy to try to come
together and see if with all the voices of these national
organizations, they could try to project a voice for Americans of
Hispanic descent.
This organization is nonpartisan and it is, as I said, a coalition of
all the major national Hispanic organizations. It includes communities
from all the different streams of Hispanic America. It includes those
individuals of Mexican American ancestry, Puerto Rican ancestry, Cuban
Americans and all those who are from the Caribbean, Central and South
American areas.
Let me give you a list of some of the organizations, national
organizations that are part of the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda.
We have the Hispanic National Bar Association. We have the Hispanic
Association of Corporate Responsibility. We have the U.S. Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce, Cuban American National Council, the League of
United Latin American Citizens, the National Hispanic Corporate
Council. We have the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, the
Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Hispanic Association
of Colleges and Universities, the Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, the American GI Forum, Alianza Dominicana, the
National Puerto Rican Coalition, MANA, a National Latina Organization,
the National Hispanic Council on Aging, the National Association of
Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, the National Council of La
Raza, and the U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce, to name some of the many
organizations that are part of the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda.
Overall they represent millions of Americans and try as best possible
to come together in one voice.
Let me show you a little bit of what they came up with. This is their
scorecard that they just recently issued. It is called the National
Hispanic Leadership Agenda congressional scorecard, 105th Congress.
What the various organizations do within the NHLA is to take a number
of very important votes that this Congress took this year and in 1997,
during the 105th Congress, and assess where we stood as a Congress with
respect to issues important to Americans of Hispanic descent.
They took many votes, about 24 of the most important votes that were
taken here in the House and about 11 of the most important votes taken
in the Senate, and they came up with a scorecard. And I went ahead and
summarized some of that so we would at least have a sense of where we
are this year at the end of the year.
Let me, if I may then, refer to this chart. If you break it down, you
will see that votes taken by the House and the Senate, there were more
votes taken in the House than in the Senate
[[Page H10992]]
and, therefore, more votes that the NHLA was able to use to try to rate
the Members of Congress, grade the Members of Congress. But what we
find is overall scores of the various votes taken in the House of
Representatives, for example, of the 24 votes that were scored, 19
percent of the time the Republicans in the House of Representatives
supported Hispanic American issues and concerns. Democrats supported,
on those same 24 votes, supported Hispanic American concerns 85 percent
of the time.
In the Senate, the support by Members of the Senate who were
Republican was 20 percent, 20 percent of the time Republican Senators
voted in support of measures that the NHLA identified as extremely
important for Hispanics throughout this country. In the Senate,
Democrats voted 89 percent of the time in support of issues that were
important to Hispanic Americans.
I further broke this down to give a better sense, since it would be
difficult to list the votes of the 435 Members of Congress along with
the 100 Members of the Senate the way the NHLA did, but if we took the
leadership, and I decided to take the leadership votes out. We find
that in the Senate, the Republican leadership under Mr. Lott, Trent
Lott, Mr. Lott's score, of the 11 votes, was zero percent,
unfortunately, which means that on no occasion did he support Hispanic
American issues. Ninety-one percent for Senator Daschle. On the House
side it was zero for Speaker Gingrich, and it was 7 percent for the
gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Gephardt).
That will give us a sense and hopefully we can go from there to see
how Congress supports issues important to Hispanic Americans.
____________________