[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 145 (Tuesday, October 13, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H10811-H10812]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNFINISHED BUSINESS REGARDING AGRICULTURE AND EDUCATION MUST BE DEALT
WITH
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from North Carolina (Mrs. Clayton) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mrs. CLAYTON. Mr. Speaker, before the 105th Congress adjourns, we
must be certain we conclude all of the unfinished business before this
Congress, especially in the area of agriculture and in education.
Looking at agriculture, it is a travesty that the appropriations
process has zeroed out the $60 million for funds for rural America
which provides important capital for rural economic development. This
funding should be reinstated. It is important to recognize that the
long-term economic health of rural America depends on a broad and
diverse economic base which requires investment in agriculture, rural
businesses, infrastructure, housing stock and community facilities.
The availability of credit is a crucial factor in the success or
failure of all small farmers, especially family farmers; both and large
and small, I must say, also suffer from the failure of having
availability of credit.
In the 1996 farm bill, those persons who, for whatever reason, had to
renegotiate their credit, whether one time or two times, were denied
the opportunity to get another direct loan or another guaranteed loan.
That was regardless of whether it was from disaster or whether it was
from having to refinance a loan because they had an overpriced or poor
crop, and also if it was because they had civil rights actions, they
are being denied, even after the government discriminated against them
and found they did. The 1996 farm bill says that regardless of whatever
the cause, that farmer cannot get a farm loan.
Now, the USDA farm program was to be the lender of last resort, and
producers who have depended on that commitment from the United States
Department of Agriculture now find they can neither have a guaranteed
loan nor a direct loan.
There is still an opportunity, I understand, before we adjourn to
adopt the Senate language which will allow that debt forgiveness and to
exclude the opportunity for consolidation or rescheduling or
reamortization or referrals of the loan as being bars or barriers from
them getting a second loan. We hope the negotiators will take that
opportunity.
In addition in the 105th Congress also the appropriators have
language in there that will allow for the statute of limitations not to
be a barrier to the black farmers who have had complaints against the
United States Department of Agriculture, even after the department has
acknowledged that they indeed did discriminate.
Now, turning to education, I am from a rural area, and I would want
to tell the last speaker that I find that the President's bill calling
for 100,000 teachers and reducing the size of classrooms would be
beneficial to North Carolina and to my district where I come from. We
come from a district that is looking for the opportunity of expanding
and recruiting more teachers, and it would certainly be beneficial to
reduce the class size, because even in North Carolina, we have found
when you reduce the class size, students do better. They achieve
better. There indeed is equal opportunity of showing that teachers
teach better when they have smaller classes.
As far as the construction loans, my state recently passed bond
construction for new schools so the monies that would come from the
Federal Government would be a supplement. It would certainly go a long
ways toward enhancing the opportunity to make sure we remove the
dilapidated buildings and schools.
[[Page H10812]]
Again, studies have shown that students, I would say rural students,
minority students and disadvantaged students, certainly learn better
when they have more teachers, more time, and they certainly learn
better as other students learn well when they have a good environment.
Mr. Speaker, the education bill being proposed by the President is
not only good for urban areas and suburban areas, but also very good
for rural areas. Rural North Carolina and the children in North
Carolina would benefit from that.
____________________