[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 143 (Sunday, October 11, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H10520]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROGRESS REPORT ON CONGRESS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Miller) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. MILLER of California. Mr. Speaker, we can talk all we want here,
or the Republicans can talk all they want, about what they are going to
do in terms of education, because most of the legislation that was just
read by the gentleman in the well is legislation that they have
proposed, it is legislation that may have passed this House, it is
legislation that they cannot get agreement with the Senate on, or it is
legislation that has come out of the committee but their caucus is in
disagreement on much of that legislation.
I appreciate and I was at the signing with the bipartisan delegation
of the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. That is what
Congress is supposed to do. Congress is supposed to reauthorize that
act when it comes due and there is no Congress that has failed to do
that.
But this Congress has failed to do much more. It has failed to meet
the needs of America's schoolchildren by failing to address the need to
reduce class size for our younger students. It has refused to meet the
need to improve our schools, the crumbling schools, some $12 billion
worth of construction that is immediately necessary, not only to make
schools safe, not only to make them healthy for our children, not only
to modernize those that need it, but also to make them ready for the
technology that is the key to much of the educational opportunity for
the students.
So this Congress has struck out on education. This Congress has
struck out on managed care, where they decided they would go with the
monied interest of the insurance companies and the HMO companies
against the American people, against the American people and their
desire to once again have a doctor-patient relationship, a doctor-
patient relationship that deals with the health care problems of the
patient, as opposed to the bottom line and the stock price of the HMO
corporation or of the insurance company that keeps meddling with the
decisions of doctors to prescribe medicine, to prescribe treatment, to
prescribe tests or to prescribe surgery.
Each and every time the doctor wants to do this, he has to pick up
the phone, the doctor has to call an 800 number, get some bureaucrat on
the phone and say can I have an MRI? I believe this person may have a
tumor. Can I have surgery? We have discovered a tumor and now we would
like to cut it out on a timely basis.
They say no, you are going to have to wait 30 days. No, send them out
for massage, send them to the whirlpool. Send them anywhere except to
surgery, where they need it to try to stem the ravages of cancer or
other malignancies.
That is what the American people have asked us to do. This Congress
could not do it. This Congress could not do it because they decided
they would deal with the money interests, just as they decided they
would deal with the monied interests and they would kill campaign
finance reform, they would kill the ability of the American people to
have a greater participation in the election process, to develop
grassroots, to make sure the people in our districts are not overridden
by all of the soft money that comes in in the last days of a campaign.
This Congress struck out in that effort.
This Congress struck out on the effort for tobacco legislation, to
try to recover for the Federal taxpayer some of the billions of dollars
that they have spent in the Medicare program taking care of the victims
of tobacco, taking care of the victims of cancer that is related to
tobacco. The states are recovering that, but somehow the Federal
Government is unable do that. Why? Because they could not stop the flow
of the tobacco contributions to the Republican party. They just could
not get off that addiction that they have, not only to tobacco, but to
tobacco campaign contributions. So this Congress struck out on that.
Finally, as Americans are working harder and harder and more
Americans are working more than ever, we thought they ought to at least
get a wage to allow them to support their families. But this Congress
could not see it that way. It decided that once again it would go with
their campaign contributions from the Small Business Association, from
the Restaurant Association, and they would deny America an increase in
the minimum wage, so those people who are working at the minimum wage
would be able to support themselves and their families.
These are people that go to work all week long, all month long and
all year long, but at the end of the year, they end up poor. So what do
we do? We have the government subsidize them in food stamps, we have
the government subsidize them in housing, we have the government
subsidize them in medical care, because their wages do not allow them
to procure these basic necessities of life for them or their family.
Why? Because the minimum wage is not high enough.
But this Congress, this do-nothing Congress, chose not to do anything
about the minimum wage, not to do anything about managed care, not to
do anything about campaign finance reform, not to do anything about the
crucial bills dealing with the improvement of education and bills to
protect the environment.
So this Congress that has only worked 108 days this year, this
Congress that has chosen to be out of town more days than it has been
here, this Congress that has chosen to come to work Tuesday night at
five o'clock and leave Thursday night at five o'clock, this Congress
that chose to extend the August break an extra week, this Congress that
chose not to work in January, February or March more than a couple of
days, this Congress now cannot find time to deal with the basic
necessities of our children's education, to get a budget and to pass
the appropriations bills.
That is why this Congress is being hailed by editorial boards and
people all over the country as a do-nothing Congress. And I would just
ask the same courtesies on time that you give the Republican Members on
the other side of the aisle. The Chair belongs to the whole House, not
to one party or the other.
____________________