[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 142 (Saturday, October 10, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H10423]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




   PROHIBITING THE CONVEYANCE OF WOODLAND LAKE PARK TRACT IN APACHE-
SITGREAVES NATIONAL FOREST IN ARIZONA UNLESS CONVEYANCE IS MADE TO TOWN 
        OF PINETOP-LAKESIDE OR AUTHORIZED BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS

  Mr. HANSEN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to take from the 
Speaker's table the Senate bill (S. 2413) prohibiting the conveyance of 
Woodland Lake Park Tract in Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in the 
State of Arizona unless the conveyance is made to the town of Pinetop-
Lakeside or is authorized by an Act of Congress, and ask for its 
immediate consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the Senate bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Utah?
  There was no objection.
  The Clerk read the Senate bill, as follows:

                                S. 2413

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. WOODLAND LAKE PARK TRACT, APACHE-SITGREAVES 
                   NATIONAL FOREST, ARIZONA.

       (a) Prohibition of Conveyance.--The Secretary of 
     Agriculture may not convey any right, title, or interest of 
     the United States in and to the Woodland Lake Park tract 
     unless the conveyance of the tract--
       (1) is made to the town of Pinetop-Lakeside; or
       (2) is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act.
       (b) Definition.--In this section, the terms ``Woodland Lake 
     Park tract'' and ``tract'' mean the parcel of land in Apache-
     Sitgreaves National Forest in the State of Arizona that 
     consists of approximately 583 acres and is known as the 
     Woodland Lake Park tract.

  The Senate bill was ordered to be read a third time, was read the 
third time, and passed, and a motion to reconsider was laid on the 
table.

                          ____________________