[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 135 (Thursday, October 1, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H9204]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EXTENDING DATE BY WHICH AUTOMATED ENTRY-EXIT CONTROL SYSTEM MUST BE
DEVELOPED
Mr. SMITH of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the
Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of
the bill (H.R. 4658) to extend the date by which an automated entry-
exit control system must be developed, and ask for its immediate
consideration in the House.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Texas?
There was no objection.
The Clerk read the bill, as follows:
H.R. 4658
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DATE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED
ENTRY-EXIT CONTROL SYSTEM.
Section 110 of division C of Public Law 104-208 is amended
by striking ``2 years after the date of enactment of this
Act'' and inserting ``October 15, 1998''.
Mr. SMITH of Texas. Mr. Speaker, today I introduced H.R. 4658, which
briefly extends the deadline for implementing Section 110(a) of the
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.
Section 110(a) of the 1996 Act required that the Attorney General
establish an automated entry-exit control system for all aliens at all
ports of entry--land, air and sea--``no later than two years after the
date of enactment'' of the 1996 Act. Since the 1996 Act was enacted on
September 30, 1996, the two year deadline for implementation is now.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service has indicated that it
needs more time to implement a control system at the land and sea
ports.
As a result, the House of Representatives passed the Solomon bill,
H.R. 2920, by a vote of 325 to 90 on November 10, 1997. This bill
extends the deadline for implementing Section 110 on land borders to
October 1, 1999, and requires that the system ``not significantly
disrupt trade, tourism, or other legitimate cross-border traffic at
land border points of entry.''
The Senate passed a different version of H.R. 2920. The Senate
version does not require the implementation of Section 110 at the land
and sea ports. Rather, it merely requires that the Attorney General
conduct a 2 year study on the feasibility and cost of developing and
implementing an automated entry-exit control system at land and
seaports. The report only requires that the INS estimate how long it
will take to implement Section 110 but does not require implementation.
The Senate also inserted a provision into the Commerce, Justice,
State (CJS) appropriations bill that would repeal Section 110.
We know that the deadline for implementation is upon us. However, due
to other issues that have arisen in recent weeks, the House and Senate
have not yet reached an agreement on how to amend Section 110.
This bill prohibits the Attorney General from implementing Section
110(a) before October 15, 1998. This brief two-week extension will
allow the House and the Senate enough time to come up with a compromise
on this issue.
The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read
the third time, and passed, and a motion to reconsider was laid on the
table.
____________________