[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 124 (Thursday, September 17, 1998)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10501-S10508]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




               SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING PUERTO RICO

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the clerk will 
report the resolution.
  The bill clerk read as follows:

       A resolution (S. Res. 279) expressing the sense of the 
     Senate supporting the right of the United States citizens in 
     Puerto Rico to express their desires regarding their future 
     political status.

  The Senate proceeded to consider the resolution.
  Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I am very pleased to join my colleagues 
in support of this sense-of-the-Senate resolution that recognizes the 
rights of U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico to decide their political 
future.
  I publicly commend the distinguished Senator from New Jersey and the 
Senator from Florida for their outstanding leadership in bringing us to 
this point. Resolutions of this kind and legislation dealing with this 
particular issue have had a roller-coaster ride in this Congress. Were 
it not for the tremendous persistence of the Senator from New Jersey 
and the Senator from Florida, we would not be here tonight. So I 
publicly express, on behalf of all of our colleagues, our thanks to 
them for their leadership, their persistence, and their diligence in 
bringing us to a point where we hope on a unanimous basis this 
resolution will at long last be adopted tonight.
  Very simply, the resolution states that the people of Puerto Rico 
should be given an opportunity to express their views on the political 
status of Puerto Rico through some form of plebiscite. President 
Kennedy once said, ``The most precious and powerful right in the world 
is the right to vote in an American election.''
  The great Mexican patriot, Benito Juarez, once said that ``democracy 
is the destiny of humanity.'' In the case of Puerto Rico, democracy 
delayed is democracy denied. The destiny of Puerto Rico's political 
future should be in the hands of the people of Puerto Rico. Congress 
should pass legislation that provides the congressional framework to 
recognize and implement their decision.
  Our Nation is built on democratic principles of equality, opportunity 
and the right of self-determination.
  Yet, American citizens on the island of Puerto Rico lack the rights 
to express the basic tenet of democracy, a government chosen by the 
people.
  In the words of Thomas Jefferson, ``That government is the strongest 
of which every man feels a part.'' In regard to Puerto Rico, formal 
recognition of these democratic ideals is long-overdue. Since the end 
of the Spanish-American War 100 years ago, we have shared a social, 
economic, and political union with Puerto Rico. In 1917, Congress 
granted citizenship to Puerto Ricans. In 1952, the people of Puerto 
Rico took on local self-government.
  In 1963, President Kennedy called for self-determination for the 
people of Puerto Rico.

[[Page S10502]]

  More than a quarter of a century later, we are still debating the 
issue in the Senate as 4 million Americans are denied basic democratic 
rights. I hope we will all agree that this is simply unacceptable.
  The people of Puerto Rico have long demonstrated their patriotism to 
the United States. Tens of thousands have served in the American 
military. More than 1,200 Puerto Ricans have died in combat to preserve 
our democratic way of life.
  Mr. President, I support the right of self-determination for U.S. 
citizens living in Puerto Rico. That is why I am a cosponsor of S. 472, 
the ``United States-Puerto Rico Political Status Act,'' which provides 
a congressionally recognized framework for U.S. citizens living in 
Puerto Rico to freely decide statehood, independence, or the 
continuance of the commonwealth under U.S. jurisdiction.
  As a first step, Congress should adopt this sense-of-the-Senate 
resolution this year in an effort to resolve the question of Puerto 
Rico's political status in a fair manner.
  We must ensure we provide full democratic rights for all American 
citizens, including those who live in Puerto Rico.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  Mr. GRAHAM addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from the great State of Florida.
  Mr. GRAHAM. Mr. President, I rise to speak on this sense-of-the-
Senate resolution with mixed feelings. I would have much preferred to 
be speaking tonight in behalf of legislation that would have provided 
for the first time in the 100-year relationship between the United 
States and Puerto Rico for a congressionally sanctioned plebiscite 
giving to the people of Puerto Rico the sense of confidence from 
respect that their voice would be heard as to their desires for their 
political future.
  Our colleagues in the House of Representatives passed such a 
plebiscite bill. Unfortunately, after months of hearings, we will not 
have the opportunity to present from the Energy and Natural Resources 
Committee to the full Senate such legislation. I commend Senator 
Murkowski who made a valiant effort to do so, including developing 
legislation which I think could have been the basis of a consensus on 
this matter and would have resulted in a favorable vote in the full 
Senate and the nucleus of a compromise with the House of 
Representatives.
  But the world goes on. The Governor of Puerto Rico has, with the 
concurrence of the Puerto Rican Congress, called for a referendum on 
the political future of Puerto Rico to be held on December 13. It is 
important that, as a minimal statement of our commitment to the 
principle of self-determination, we adopt this sense-of-the-Senate 
resolution and express our position in favor of that plebiscite and 
indicate that we will take its results with appropriate seriousness.
  We recognize, and the sense-of-the-Senate resolution proclaims, that 
the ultimate decision as to the political future of Puerto Rico will be 
made by this Congress, but by giving the degree of recognition to the 
Puerto Rican-called plebiscite on December 13 that this sense-of-the-
Senate resolution will do; it will give additional standing, additional 
confidence, to the people of Puerto Rico that their vote on that day 
will have an important impact here as we decide what next steps to take 
relative to the political future of Puerto Rico.
  Mr. President, it is clear that we cannot continue with the status 
quo. A decision is going to have to be made, and I believe made soon, 
as to what the permanent political status of Puerto Rico will be. We 
have had this expedience throughout America's history.
  After the first 13 colonies, there was the Northwest Ordinance which 
laid out the basic principle by which future States would be carved out 
of the large territories of America and joined to the Original States. 
And that principle included the fact that those new States would join 
with equal dignity, with equal political rights and responsibilities to 
the Thirteen Original States. These have been basic tenets of our 
democracy which now we are called upon to make available to the people 
of Puerto Rico.
  My colleague, Senator Torricelli, in comments last week made the 
statement which I think summarizes the essence of the debate that we 
are having this evening, and that is, that Puerto Rico represents the 
unfinished business of American democracy. And it cannot be ignored--
unfinished business. We need to set about our task of completing that. 
And that task begins by a respectful listening to the desires of the 
almost 4 million U.S. citizens who live on the island of Puerto Rico.
  I remind my colleagues that we are not talking about 4 million people 
who are citizens of a foreign land. Every one of those 4 million people 
in Puerto Rico is a citizen of the United States of America. These are 
fellow citizens who have never been afforded the opportunity for a 
clear congressionally sanctioned expression of their opinion as to what 
their political future should be. The nearly 4 million U.S. citizens 
who reside in Puerto Rico are entitled to that opportunity. And this 
combination of a Puerto Rican congressionally called plebiscite with 
this degree of sanction by the U.S. Congress is as close as we can 
reach to that objective in 1998.
  The sense of the Senate is the very least that we can do to honor the 
request of our fellow U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico and send them a 
clear message that we are listening to their desires.
  The sense of the Senate, in conjunction with the House-passed bill, 
takes an important step in the right direction. I thank all of my 
colleagues who have cosponsored this resolution. I thank all of those 
who have been so active in the effort to secure a congressionally 
sanctioned plebiscite in Puerto Rico.
  I say to our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico, we admire your 
contribution for a century to the development of our land. We admire 
your patriotism in time of war and your great contributions in time of 
peace. We extend to you this statement of our respect.
  We urge your full participation in the plebiscite on December 13. We 
will be anxious to receive your statement of your desires for your 
political destiny. And then I hope that my colleagues here in this 
Chamber and our companion Chamber will hear with dignity what you have 
said and will move towards, with your direction, providing a permanent 
political status for the U.S. citizens on the island of Puerto Rico.
  Thank you, Mr. President.
  Mr. CRAIG addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Idaho.
  Mr. CRAIG. Mr. President, first of all, let me thank the Senator from 
New Jersey for authoring and bringing forth Senate Resolution 279. I am 
pleased to be a cosponsor of it, along with the chairman of the Energy 
and Natural Resources Committee, Senator Murkowski; for he and I have, 
can I say, labored mightily, along with the Senator from Florida, over 
the last good many months, first of all, to work on the issue of self-
determination for Puerto Rico.
  I certainly thank all of my colleagues for the cosponsorship of S. 
472, legislation that I introduced a year ago that I hoped, as does the 
Senator from Florida, that we could be voting on at this time--debating 
it, voting on it, and giving our Puerto Rican friends and fellow 
citizens the opportunity, a clear direction as it relates to self-
determination. That is not going to be the case. Time has not allowed 
that.
  So I hope that by next year the record before the Senate might 
include the results of another plebiscite in Puerto Rico that the 
Senator from Florida has just mentioned. That is why the resolution 
before us today, I think, is very important.
  In accordance with their rights of self-determination, the citizens 
of this Nation--the people of Puerto Rico--acting through their 
constitutional process and elected representatives, have empowered 
themselves to conduct a vote based on the record created in the House 
and the Senate deliberations in the Congress since the 1993 vote.
  Since any act of self-determination in Puerto Rico is not self-
executing, the resolution of Puerto Rico's political status is a 
Federal matter that can only be fully and finally determined by an act 
of Congress. However, in the exercising of its powers in this regard, 
Congress must be informed by the freely expressed wishes of the 
citizens of Puerto Rico. Thus, this resolution recognizes that the 
coming vote will advance the process of self-determination

[[Page S10503]]

within the framework of our great Nation's Constitution.
  Contrary to rumors in Puerto Rico, there was no great intrigue or 
political reaction to videotapes from the local status campaigns that 
prevented the Senate from moving forward with legislation at this time. 
Rather, faced with what we all understand is a very complicated 
schedule here in the final days before we adjourn, and concern on the 
part of colleagues on both sides of the aisle, we have brought Senate 
Resolution 279 to the floor to express at this time, as the House has 
expressed, an opportunity for the Puerto Ricans to advance the cause of 
their self-determination. And I hope that the resolution and our vote 
on it tonight reflects that.
  Mr. President, today the Senate ends its prolonged silence on the 
question of Puerto Rico's political status. The 105th Congress will not 
end without a Senate response to the 1994 and 1997 petitions of the 
Legislature of Puerto Rico to Congress. By our action today, the Senate 
joins the House in responding to those petitions by recognizing the 
need for further self-determination in Puerto Rico. This is because the 
1993 status vote in Puerto Rico did not resolve the status question. 
Indeed, no option won a majority in 1993.
  That is why I sponsored a bill to recognize the need for further 
self-determination. I thank my colleagues from both parties who joined 
me by cosponsoring S. 472.
  I also want to thank the chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources 
Committee, Senator Murkowski, for his assistance and leadership to 
establish a record to support action by the committee and the full 
Senate on this matter. I regret that the draft chairman's mark has not 
been acted on, but I applaud his commitment to move the self 
determination issue forward.
  It now appears that by next year the record before the Senate may 
include the results of another plebiscite in Puerto Rico. That is why 
the resolution before us today is so very important. In accordance with 
their right of self-determination, the people of Puerto Rico, acting 
through their constitutional process and elected representatives, have 
empowered themselves to conduct a vote based on the record created in 
the House and Senate deliberations in Congress since the 1993 vote.
  Since any act of self-determination in Puerto Rico is not self-
executing, resolution of Puerto Rico's political status is a federal 
matter that can only be fully and finally determined by an act of 
Congress. However, in exercising its powers in this regard Congress 
must be informed by the freely expressed wishes of the residents of 
Puerto Rico. Thus, this resolution recognizes that the coming vote will 
advance the process of self-determination within the framework of our 
great Nation's Constitution.
  Contrary to rumors in Puerto Rico, there was no great intrigue or 
political reaction to videotapes from the local status campaigns that 
prevented the Senate from moving forward with legislation at this time. 
Rather, faced with the difficulty of completing a full Senate debate on 
the draft chairman's legislative mark, this body is doing the right 
thing by moving forward with a Resolution recognizing the need for 
further self-determination and recognizing the constraints placed upon 
it.
  I am proud of the Senate today, and I am proud of the people of 
Puerto Rico for seizing the moment and organizing an act of self-
determination that is based upon the arguments heard in the 
Congressional process which will continue next year. This action is 
good for Puerto Rico and serves the interests of our entire Nation as 
we move forward together to seek to resolve the territorial status 
dilemma that began 100 years ago. I wish our fellow U.S. citizens in 
Puerto Rico well in exercising their God given right of self-
determination. I hope they will join me in trusting that their voice 
will be heard and that Congress will answer. In America, we have no 
alternative to democracy and desire nothing more.
  I join with my colleagues from Florida, New Jersey--now the chairman 
of the full committee is here on the floor--to say to our friends and 
citizens of Puerto Rico that we ask them to go forward with their vote 
in December. We hope that that is an advanced expression of their 
desire to advance the cause of statehood, but most importantly to 
advance the cause of self-determination so that the Congress can have 
the kind of direction that we hope that vote will bring.
  With that, I yield the floor.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. In view of my colleagues who have waited longer than I 
have, I simply want to identify the time on either side, and if I may, 
if there is no objection, I would like to control the time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority has 20 minutes; the minority has 
13 minutes.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. I would be happy to--obviously, I will not speak for 
the minority--but I would yield whatever time to the minority or 
perhaps Senator Torricelli would like to control the time for the 
minority.
  Mr. GRAHAM addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Florida.


                         Privilege Of The Floor

  Mr. GRAHAM. I ask unanimous consent that Delia Lasanta, Luis Rivera, 
and Danielle Quintana of my staff and Susan Nisar of Senator D'Amato's 
staff be accorded floor privileges for the remainder of today's 
session.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. TORRICELLI addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, is there a unanimous consent request 
proposed by the Senator from Alaska?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. If the Senator would withhold for a moment, 10 
minutes of the minority's time is already under the control of Senator 
Sarbanes under a previous order.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I be able 
to control the remainder of the minority time and the Senator from 
Alaska control the remainder of the majority time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. How much time does the Senator from New York desire?
  Mr. D'AMATO. No more than 5 minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New York is recognized for 5 
minutes.
  Mr. D'AMATO. Mr. President, let me at the outset say how tremendously 
proud and pleased I am that one of my great and dear friends, the 
Senator from Alaska, has worked so hard and so diligently to attempt to 
advance a cause that this Nation espouses to so many.
  We talk about the lack of freedom throughout the world. We talk about 
democracy. Indeed, it is unfortunate that there are strong forces, 
people who I know and who I respect, who even at this very time give 
lip service rather than meaningful and true support for that cause. 
Senator Murkowski understands that freedom and democracy are not 
something that just should be for some, but should be for all, and that 
the right of self-determination is an inalienable God-given right. It 
is one that this country is founded on. People have paid the greatest 
price and sacrifice with their life, jeopardizing their families, in 
the fight for freedom and democracy.
  I have to tell Members that it is more than imperative, it is a moral 
necessity, that we strongly encourage the process of self-determination 
for 4 million Americans, U.S. citizens who live in Puerto Rico, that 
they should determine by what rules and what form of government they 
should live.
  We have for years talked about the lack of democracy in all areas of 
the world. We talk about it in China, Korea, here, there. We should be 
ashamed that it has taken us so long to come forth with a rather simple 
resolution, and that it has taken such an incredible effort by the 
Senator from Alaska and others, to bring us to this point. This is a 
pittance in comparison to those who have bled, who have sacrificed for 
democracy, for self-determination.
  I hope we understand that we want to encourage people, saying the 
right to vote, the right to determine one's own destiny, is 
inalienable.
  I would like to have a recorded vote. I would like for us to say: We 
are going

[[Page S10504]]

to recognize your hopes and your aspirations and your dreams. It is my 
hope that the people vote for statehood. But that is their right. They 
may determine that they want to continue the present situation, but 
they should have that inalienable right, and we should say to them that 
we are ready and willing to recognize your choice, your decision, as 
free men and women, and, yes, that we would be willing and ready to 
undertake supporting that decision because we respect the inalienable 
rights of people to make their own determination.
  As we mark the 100th anniversary of Puerto Rico becoming a part of 
the United States, I think it is important to recognize that their sons 
and daughters have made the supreme sacrifice. They have answered the 
call of duty. They have been there. And now it is time for us to say: 
You can be a part of this great Nation, not just as citizens, but as a 
State, if you choose, if you determine, and then send your response to 
us.
  There are those who say it doesn't matter. Well, it does matter, and 
it is bigger than partisan politics. It is bigger than Republicans and 
Democrats. I believe that in the fullness of time what an incredible 
beacon a 51st State might be. But that is for the people of Puerto Rico 
to determine. What an example to all of Central America and South 
America, in terms of sharing our cultures, our values, with this island 
as part of this great Nation. Certainly at the very least, the people 
of Puerto Rico, our citizens, should have that right which we declare 
day in and day out is inalienable for people throughout the country, 
for all corners of the world.
  I congratulate my friends who have brought it to this point, and the 
Senate majority leader, and Senator Torricelli for his unwavering 
support of that commitment to justice, to democracy, to self-
determination.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, I want to first express my 
congratulations to Senator Murkowski without whose efforts in committee 
we would not, today, be discussing this resolution; Senator Graham of 
Florida, who has labored for so long on this cause; Senator Daschle; 
Senator Landrieu; Senator D'Amato; Senator Craig; so many Members of 
this institution who have taken the cause and interests of the people 
of Puerto Rico and made them their own.
  There are few more solemn responsibilities to come to the Congress of 
the United States than the issue of admission into this great Union. It 
is solemn because to join in union is to share a future, to pledge our 
fortunes, our lives, together. It is a serious occasion because the 
prospect of joining this Union raises the prospect of ``forever,'' 
because this Union is indivisible, it is permanent. The judgment to 
join this Union is made by any peoples and any lands but once in their 
history, and it is never revisited again.
  For 100 years, the people of Puerto Rico and these United States have 
shared a common history. Our people have fought together, bled 
together, and died together. Our cultures over a period of time 
increasingly have merged. Hundreds of thousands, indeed, millions, of 
people of Puerto Rico have chosen to live among other Americans in 
these United States. Indeed, the judgment that potentially might be 
made by the people of Puerto Rico who reside on the island has 
economically and culturally and even politically already been made by 
millions of others in how they live and where they choose to live.
  The history of the United States for these 200 years has been a 
history of constant enfranchisement, expanding the right to vote to 
African-Americans, to women, people 18 years of age, in our own 
generation to the people of Hawaii and Alaska.
  It is part of the great history of this country that we, unlike other 
nations, were not satisfied to simply enfranchise ourselves but 
recognized we were the greater and the better people through our 
expansion. Now we, potentially, visit that question again. It is a 
judgment that can only be made by the people of Puerto Rico for 
themselves. This is ultimately their responsibility to decide. But it 
is the responsibility of this Congress that they have the right to 
decide. It is a peculiar and tragic irony of history that the first 
republic to be created out of colonialism might now enter the 21st 
century in a neocolonialist position.
  No American should be content with this contradiction of our own 
history, and some might claim--some might even accuse--that this U.S. 
Government is in a position with the people of Puerto Rico that is 
anything less than full, free, fair, and democratic. Yet, by the 
definition we have applied for ourselves, it would be difficult to 
defend against the charge. Written on the walls of this Capitol from 
the inaugural address of President Harrison in 1841 is, ``The only 
legitimate right to government is an expressed grant of power from the 
governed.''
  Yet, Mr. President, every day, the people of Puerto Rico are 
subjected to fees, rules, regulations, policies, and determinations 
from this Congress, having no representative who has a right to vote 
and make a judgment on their behalf. The relationship between the 
people of Puerto Rico and the United States is a contradiction with 
everything that we hold dear and every principle upon which this 
country was founded.
  Mr. President, I urge the people of Puerto Rico to take this judgment 
seriously between this date and December 13 and to think carefully. If 
they decide to join this Union, this is a moment that they will not 
visit again. Joining this Union is permanent. If it were my judgment, 
I, like the Senator from New York, Senator D'Amato, would choose to 
join the Union. I believe history has given us the right and the 
responsibility to face the future together. But I recognize mine is no 
more than a casual opinion. The decision rests with the people of 
Puerto Rico alone. The importance of this resolution is that as the 
people of Puerto Rico vote, they should recognize that the U.S. 
Congress considers Puerto Rico to genuinely be the unfinished business 
of American democracy.
  The people of Puerto Rico should recognize as they vote that the 
Congress of the United States is watching, that we recognize our 
responsibilities and are prepared in the 106th Congress to receive 
their judgment and make our own decision about the future of this 
Union.
  Mr. President, once again, I want to congratulate Senator Murkowski 
for having presided over these issues these months, and Senator Graham 
for his leadership, and each of my colleagues who come to this floor on 
a bipartisan basis, across ideological lines, uniting in our common 
belief that there is no right to govern without the consent of the 
governed and that it is not good enough, in spite of the 
enfranchisement of all of our people across this continent, that there 
remains a single exception. America is too good a land, our history is 
too great, for anyone to be an exception to these great and lasting 
principles.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, it is my understanding that this side 
has about 15 minutes remaining?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Yes, 15 minutes.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. I yield 5 minutes to Senator Domenici from New Mexico.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Mexico.
  Mr. DOMENICI. Mr. President, first, let me say that it is most 
appropriate that we take this action tonight during the second week of 
Hispanic Heritage Month in the United States. It is quite appropriate, 
while we are honoring the contribution which Hispanic culture has made 
to our country, that we are now saying to one group of Hispanics who 
live on the island of Puerto Rico that we are willing to see you take a 
vote regarding whether or not you would choose to become the next 
State.
  Mr. President, this resolution affirms that the first step in any 
change of political status for the community of Puerto Rico rests with 
the people of that island. When they express that opinion in December--
December of this very year--then it will be up to Congress to take 
whatever steps are necessary to consider that decision.
  Let me say that there are a number of Senate heroes with reference to 
this Puerto Rico resolution. First, I must say that the individuals 
most likely to recall the difficulties of taking a vote and deciding 
whether to become a State are the citizens represented by

[[Page S10505]]

those Senators whose States were last admitted, or close to being last 
admitted. So the hero tonight is Frank Murkowski of the great state of 
Alaska. For anybody wondering, that is not a Hispanic name--Murkowski--
but it is a name of European descent, perhaps Polish. He understands 
what it is for a State to go through this process of deciding whether 
you are going to become a part of the Union, the United States of 
America.
  I remind the Puerto Ricans--who are Americans in their own right--
that Americans think that the United States is so important that we had 
a Civil War over whether you could unilaterally drop out of the Union 
once you joined it. So I want you to take it seriously, Puerto Rico, 
because it is serious. We had the biggest battle within the borders of 
our own Nation about the issue of keeping this great country together, 
and you should know that and you should be concerned about that.
  Secondly, let me suggest that in the State of New York there is a 
Senator named Senator D'Amato, and the Puerto Ricans know that is not a 
Spanish name either; it is Italian like mine, Domenici. But this 
Senator from New York understands what the Puerto Ricans in his State 
and the Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico mean to our Nation. He has always 
been willing to give the people in Puerto Rico an opportunity to 
determine their destiny. And I believe second to Senator Murkowski on 
our side of the aisle, behind the scenes, Senator D'Amato has made it 
very clear that this night should occur--not next year or the year 
after, but now. So I compliment my good friend and a friend of the 
Puerto Rican people in New York and across the country. I compliment 
the Senator for his tremendous, tremendous regard for what Puerto Rico 
believes is right and fair.
  I must say, from the other side of the aisle, it is most interesting 
that tonight we have a series of Senators with these strange names--
Murkowski on our side, D'Amato on our side, Domenici speaking, and 
Torricelli from New Jersey. I compliment Senator Torricelli for his 
vigilant and absolute persistence that something should be done on this 
issue before we leave here.
  So tonight, without any question, the Puerto Rican people can already 
say across the island and throughout the rest of America, because it is 
a foregone conclusion, that the Senate will vote on this resolution 
propounded by the Senator from Alaska, Senator Murkowski. Frankly, it 
will pass overwhelmingly. There will be no dissenting votes tonight, 
because for those who would like to dissent, they have already decided 
that they are not going to make a point of it.
  As a consequence, we are going to approve this in just as formidable 
a way as if we had voted, when the U.S. Senate says without a 
dissenting vote tonight, that we agree with this resolution.
  Mr. President, once again, many of us came here from around the 
world, or our parents or grandparents did. And we know the validity and 
the great value of America. We hope the people in Puerto Rico 
understand that and act accordingly.
  I yield the floor.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I believe Senator Hatch would like 
recognition for 3 minutes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Utah is recognized for 3 
minutes.
  Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I have been to Puerto Rico. I have to say 
it is a beautiful land.
  These are our fellow citizens. They have to make this determination. 
Of course, we should give them that right.
  I have heard both arguments within Puerto Rico. Some feel it is a 
great idea to have statehood. Others don't think it is quite so great. 
There are disadvantages to becoming a State. There is no question about 
it. But there are great advantages as well.
  All we are doing here this evening is acknowledging as Members of the 
U.S. Senate the right of our fellow U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico to 
express democratically their views regarding their future political 
status through a referendum or other public forum, and to communicate 
those views to the President of the United States and to the Congress.
  That is the least we could do. These are good people. These are proud 
people. These are people who have contributed to this country--and who 
will contribute to this country--even though their status has been 
different from other citizens.
  I personally endorse and support this resolution here this evening. I 
hope and I know that it will pass. It will pass unanimously, which I 
think is the high tribute to the people of Puerto Rico and to those on 
both sides of this issue down there.
  I congratulate all of those who have worked so hard to get this done, 
especially Senator Murkowski, Senator Torricelli, the others who have 
been mentioned, Senator D'Amato and Senator Domenici.
  This is a wonderful evening, a wonderful day, and something that is 
long overdue. I congratulate my colleagues for having accomplished this 
today.
  I yield the floor.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, first of all, in the concluding minutes 
that we have before our vote, let me recognize from the House of 
Representatives our good friend, Carlos Romero-Barcelo, who is with us 
watching this historic action of the U.S. Senate. It is a pleasure to 
have you with us, my friend. Your contribution to these moments have 
been immeasurable, and your people of Puerto Rico can be very proud of 
your contribution in bringing this matter from the House of 
Representatives to the floor of the U.S. Senate tonight.
  Mr. President, let me acknowledge my good friends and colleagues who 
have had such a significant role in moving this to where we are today. 
Of course, that would include Senator Torricelli and Senator D'Amato.
  I think it is important to recognize the constituency associated with 
many of the Members who have come forth as initial sponsors. Senator 
Lautenberg referred to Senator Hatch; my good friend from Hawaii, 
Senator Akaka; Senator Daschle; Senator Landrieu; Senator Lieberman; 
Senator Graham of Florida; and Senator Domenici, and there are many, 
many more.
  But the significance of the commitment, particularly of Senator 
D'Amato and Senator Torricelli, I think represent an extraordinary 
sensitivity as brought out in the statements not necessarily 
individually of their feeling towards what America is all about but 
perhaps better in the comments that were made by the Senator from New 
Mexico, Senator Domenici, who indicated, as you look at the names of 
sponsors on this legislation, that you have a potpourri, if you will, 
of the mixture of Americans committed to democracy.
  I must acknowledge in my thanks to my colleagues that this Senator 
from Alaska does not have a large Puerto Rican constituency. But I do 
have a long memory.
  Alaska has been a State since 1959. I grew up in a territory. We had 
taxation without representation. My father used to say he felt good 
about being able to write on his income tax form in a red pen ``filed 
under protest, taxation without representation.'' But that is the 
extent of what made him feel good.
  I can recall seeing neighbors when I was too young to go into the 
draft being drafted. We were second-class citizens, Mr. President. We 
had special identification cards to leave the territory of Alaska to 
visit the State of Washington. It was quite a blow to the sensitivity 
of American citizens, and as a consequence we have a situation with 
regard to Puerto Rico today.
  Mr. President, I would like to have the clerk reserve at least 2 
minutes of my time remaining for one of my colleagues who is here with 
me.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has 4 minutes 30 seconds 
remaining.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, if I may, I want to specifically cite 
the fact that I support this resolution. I fully support the objective 
of this resolution in reaffirming the right of our fellow citizens in 
Puerto Rico to express their desires on political status through 
popular referenda and to communicate those desires to the federal 
government. I also agree that the federal government should carefully 
review and consider any such communication.

[[Page S10506]]

This resolution is fully consistent with the objective of the draft 
chairman's mark that I circulated immediately prior to the recess.

  I want to thank my colleagues who reviewed the draft chairman's mark 
and who provided me with comments and suggestions. As I stated in my 
press release last week, I do not think that there will be time to 
fully consider the legislation this session, but I think we have made 
considerable progress. This resolution is fully consistent with the 
philosophy of my draft that the initiative for any political status 
change lies exclusively with Puerto Rico.
  During this Congress, the House of Representatives has passed 
legislation requiring a referendum in Puerto Rico. Similar legislation 
was introduced in the Senate. I stated at the outset of this Congress, 
that I consider the matter of political status one of the most 
important constitutional responsibilities of the Congress and of my 
committee.
  I cautioned when those measures were introduced that as much as some 
would like to see legislation enacted in this centennial year of Puerto 
Rico coming under United States sovereignty, this was an 
extraordinarily complex and important issue and deserved full and fair 
consideration because I recall what happened in my own State of Alaska. 
It took a long time. Although the committee conducted a series of 
meetings in Puerto Rico at the beginning of the Congress, I made the 
decision that we would wait for the House to pass legislation before we 
began the formal committee process. I made that decision so that our 
committee would have all the various proposals before us.
  By the time the House passed its legislation, it was already clear 
that it would be very difficult to resolve the many questions presented 
by the legislation this year. I want to emphasize the words ``this 
year,'' because I think there has been too much emphasis on timing and 
not enough on substance.
  I am committed to the enactment of responsible legislation and not 
simply to the enactment of legislation this year.
  Nonetheless, and despite the limitations of the Senate schedule and 
the importance of the other measures pending before the committee, we 
held a series of workshops, oversight hearing, and legislative 
hearings. I circulated a draft chairman's mark prior to the August 
recess to my colleagues on the committee. I asked for a review and 
comments. Several Members submitted very thoughtful amendments to the 
draft chairman's mark. While I have directed the staff to continue to 
work on these amendments, I do not see that attempting to force the 
legislative process would either be wise or helpful in view of the 
remaining time left in this session.

  The initial workshop heard from the Governor and the leadership of 
the three recognized political parties in Puerto Rico. The Governor 
expressed the desire of the government of Puerto Rico to obtain an 
expression from the federal government of status alternatives. The 
parties agreed that so long as each political party is able to craft 
its own definition, those definition, those definitions would be 
political statements and as a result, no referendum would provide the 
clarity that Congress would want.
  The first oversight hearing considered the fiscal and economic 
implications of any change in status. Those proceedings shed 
considerable light on some of the difficulties involved in any 
transition to prepare Puerto Rico for either consideration of an 
Admissions Act or for the withdrawal of United States sovereignty.
  The second oversight hearing focused on the individual issues 
involved in separate sovereignty, either as full independence or in 
some form of free association. In addition to a consideration of the 
issues, especially that of citizenship, the hearing also served to 
focus on sovereignty as the test for consideration of those issues.
  Those hearings and the legislative hearing that followed demonstrated 
how unique the present circumstances of Puerto Rico is and how 
difficult any change in status will be. The hearings also demonstrate 
that the federal government is responsible for the present situation 
and the creation of the obstacles that must be overcome prior to any 
change in status.
  A major defect, in my mind, in the measures pending before the 
committee and in the definitions used in past referenda in Puerto Rico, 
is the failure of the definitions for Statehood or Independence to 
acknowledge that Puerto Rico is not presently prepared for federal 
consideration of either option.
  There is a very complex and difficult process involved before either 
option could be implemented, as our hearings demonstrated.
  For Statehood, that process would entail, at a minimum, significant 
consideration of several entitlement programs as well as the extension 
of the Internal Revenue laws in concert with a complete overhaul of 
Puerto Rico's local tax code. This is not a simple matter and I do not 
expect that it can be done rapidly. Only after that transition is 
complete should Congress consider fully extending the Constitution to 
Puerto Rico.
  As my colleagues know, the Constitution does not fully apply to 
Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico has never been ``incorporated'' into the 
United States. Alaska and Hawaii were fully incorporated well before 
the first Admissions Act was even introduced. Only after the debate on 
incorporation has concluded and when the Constitution is fully 
applicable in Puerto Rico can the political debate on admissions begin.
  The point that I tried to achieve in my draft chairman's mark, is 
that Congress has created a series of obstacles to the achievement of 
any change in political status. I think we owe our fellow citizens an 
explanation of what the process is likely to be to overcome those 
obstacles so that they can express their desires with a clear 
understanding of the process that lies before them.
  A second major defect in the legislation was that it required Puerto 
Rico to vote on federally defined options. How and whether Puerto Rico 
seeks to petition the Congress should not be dictated by the federal 
government. If we are serious about local self-government, then we 
should be willing to allow the local government to determine how to 
respond to the desires of its constituents. Not all territories 
conducted referenda on future political status and none were ever 
required to hold one by the federal government. As part of the Enabling 
or Admissions Act, some territories were required to agree to the terms 
of a particular Statehood proposal, but that came after Congress had 
enacted the legislation to provide for their admission.
  We should not constrain Puerto Rico in how it seeks to approach a 
request to the federal government. Perhaps they will continue to use 
referenda, perhaps they will use resolutions of the legislature, 
perhaps they will use petitions. Each territory has approached the 
process from its own political perspective and we should not dictate to 
our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico what process they must use.
  As a result of our workshops and hearings, I circulated a draft 
chairman's mark prior to the August recess to my colleagues on the 
committee. I asked for their review and comments. Several Members have 
submitted very thoughtful amendments to my draft chairman's mark. While 
I have directed staff to work on those amendments, I do not see that 
attempting to force the legislative process would be either wise or 
helpful.
  I support the objectives of this resolution and they are fully 
consistent with the framework of my draft chairman's mark. There is no 
question that Puerto Rico, either through popular referenda or 
resolution of the legislature or simple petition, has the right to 
express its desire on political status. There should also be no 
question that the federal government should respond to any such 
expression seriously and with due consideration.
  The government of Puerto Rico has now enacted legislation calling for 
a referendum on December 13 of this year. In developing the definitions 
that will be placed before the voters, the draftsmen had before them 
the language contained in the House-passed measure, the Senate-
introduced measure, and my draft chairman's mark. They also had the 
testimony of the administration.
  They chose to adopt definitions based on their own judgement. I want 
to make absolutely clear that even had

[[Page S10507]]

the draft chairman's mark been enacted, Puerto Rico would not have been 
obliged to adopt the definitions contained in it. My draft mark was 
strictly advisory as will be the results of any referendum. That is as 
it should be. All we could hope to do would be to provide some guidance 
as to what this Congress thinks the process would likely be. Just as we 
can not bind a future Congress, neither can an advisory referendum bind 
us.
  I believe that we still owe our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico a fair 
statement of the alternatives and process involved in future political 
status so that they can express their desires in a meaningful way. 
Passage of this resolution does not in any sense diminish the 
importance of providing that information. This resolution does reaffirm 
that the initial step for any political status change rests with out 
fellow citizens in Puerto Rico. Only they can decide whether and when 
to petition the Congress for consideration of a change in status. Only 
Congress can consider the legislation necessary to remove the obstacles 
to such a status and, in the philosophy of the Northwest Ordinance, 
prepare Puerto Rico for consideration of that status.
  I think that ultimately we need to clarify that process in 
legislation. Time is running out for this session of Congress, but I 
intend to resume where we are now at the beginning of the 106th 
Congress. In the interim, I think we have made considerable progress in 
clarifying the issues through our hearings and in the reactions to the 
draft chairman's mark. This resolution is completely consistent with 
that progress.
  My best wishes go to the Governor and the people of Puerto Rico as 
they prepare to express their preference on the December 13 referendum 
vote.
  I yield the time I have remaining to the senior Senator from Alaska, 
Mr. Stevens.
  Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I thank my colleague from Alaska.
  I come to the floor to congratulate him and the other members of his 
committee for the action they are taking tonight to recognize the 
continuing support of the Congress for the determination by the people 
of Puerto Rico of what their future status should be.
  The first resolution dealing with Alaska was introduced in the 
Congress in 1913. Final action on statehood for Alaska took place in 
1958. We became a State in 1959, as Senator Murkowski said. It is a 
long process to seek to change the political status of a portion of the 
United States, and Puerto Rico is a portion of our country. Its people 
really deserve the opportunity to express themselves on what their 
future should be.
  So my congratulations to everyone for moving this resolution forward. 
I hope the day will come when I am still in the Senate that we can vote 
on statehood for Puerto Rico.
  Mr. TORRICELLI addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. How much time remains?
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey controls 4 minutes 
40 seconds.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, let me finally, in conclusion, also 
thank Carlos Romero-Barcelo. The fact that this Senate has come 
together in this extraordinary judgment would not have been possible 
without his leadership. And also, as Senator Murkowski said, Governor 
Pedro Rossello has been such an important person in building this very 
broad coalition. To the Governor, I offer my very sincere 
congratulations. He is an extraordinary man who has given great service 
to his people in making this night possible. Carlos Romero-Barcelo, 
your service has been nonetheless a great credit to the people of 
Puerto Rico.
  Mr. President, I yield the remainder of my time to the Senator from 
Connecticut, Mr. Lieberman.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Connecticut is recognized for 
4 minutes.
  Mr. LIEBERMAN. I thank the Chair. I thank my friend from New Jersey 
particularly for his leadership in bringing this resolution forward and 
to express my own pleasure at being a cosponsor along with a bipartisan 
group of cosponsors.
  Mr. President, very briefly, this resolution is about principle. It 
is not about politics. It is about the principle of self-determination, 
which was at the heart of the creation of America--the principle of 
self-determination, democracy, self-rule. It has continued throughout 
our history to today, when it remains a fundamental priority element of 
our foreign policy toward other peoples and other nations.
  Really, what this is about is taking that fundamental American 
principle which we are eager to apply around the world and applying it 
to 4 million of our fellow American citizens who live on the islands 
that constitute Puerto Rico, who served and died in defense of 
America's freedom in disproportionate numbers. They deserve the right 
to become fully free, determine their destiny, participate fully, if 
they choose and how they choose, in our democracy.
  Senator Murkowski has been a very steadfast leader in this effort. It 
didn't get as far as he or we wanted, but this resolution at least 
gives us the possibility, before the 105th session adjourns and prior 
to the referendum that will be held in Puerto Rico in December, to say 
as Members of the Senate of both parties we welcome the exercise and 
recognize the right of our 4 million fellow Americans in Puerto Rico to 
express themselves to us and that we will review any such communication 
that results from the vote that they hold in December. It is the least 
we can do to be true to our principles.
  I thank the Chair and I yield the floor.
  Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, I rise in strong support of this 
resolution. I am pleased that we are passing this resolution on the 
second day of Hispanic Heritage Month because Puerto Ricans, like all 
Hispanic Americans, have made a great contribution to the culture and 
economic growth of America.
  There are nearly 4,000,000 American Citizens who live in the Islands 
of Puerto Rico. They are an integral part of our nation, they pay taxes 
and serve and die in our nation's military. Furthermore, there are 
millions of American Citizens with Puerto Rican heritage who live on 
the continent, hundreds of thousands of whom live in New Jersey. In 
many ways, New Jersey is a second home for Puerto Ricans.
  I strongly believe that the American citizens who live in Puerto Rico 
should have the right to a democratic vote to determine the future 
status of these islands. I am pleased that such a referendum will take 
place in December. After this vote, Congress should take the 
appropriate legislative action that reflects the will of the American 
citizens living in Puerto Rico. And I will work with my colleagues to 
make sure that this happens.
  I urge my colleagues to support this resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Who seeks recognition?
  Mr. MURKOWSKI addressed the Chair.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. I see no other Senator wishing to speak.
  I believe there is no more remaining time on our side.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Alaska controls 2 minutes; 
the Senator from New Jersey controls 1 minute 45 seconds.
  Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. President, I yield back my time.
  Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I would be very pleased, if there is no 
other Senator wishing recognition, to yield back the remainder of our 
time.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the resolution and 
the preamble are agreed to.
  The resolution (S. Res. 279), with its preamble, reads as follows:

                              S. Res. 279

       Whereas nearly 4,000,000 United States citizens live in the 
     islands of Puerto Rico.
       Whereas 1998 marks the centenary of the acquisition of the 
     islands of Puerto Rico from Spain;
       Wheras in 1917 the United States granted United States 
     citizenship to the inhabitants of Puerto Rico.
       Whereas since 1952, Puerto Rico has exercised local self-
     government under the sovereignty of the United States and 
     subject to the provisions of the Constitution of the United 
     States and other Federal laws applicable to Puerto Rico;
       Whereas the Senate supports and recognizes the rights of 
     United States citizens residing in Puerto Rico to express 
     their views regarding their future political status; and
       Whereas the political status of Puerto Rico can be 
     determined only by the Congress of the United States: Now, 
     therefore, be it

[[Page S10508]]

       Resolved,

     SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING A REFERENDUM ON THE 
                   FUTURE POLITICAL STATUS OF PUERTO RICO.

       It is the sense of the Senate that--
       (1) the Senate supports and recognizes the right of United 
     States citizens residing in Puerto Rico to express 
     democratically their views regarding their future political 
     status through a referendum or other public reform, and to 
     communicate those views to the President and Congress; and
       (2) the Federal Government should review any such 
     communication.

  Mr. MURKOWSKI. I thank the Chair.
  I move to reconsider the vote and lay that motion on the table.
  The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.

                          ____________________