[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 118 (Wednesday, September 9, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H7470-H7472]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A WORLDWIDE FINANCIAL CRISIS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Everett). Under the Speaker's announced
policy of January 7, 1997, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Paul) is
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, we are now experiencing a worldwide financial
crisis. It may yet prove to be the worst in all of history.
There have been a lot of wringing of hands as to the cause, but the
source of the problem is not a mystery. It is a currency induced
crisis.
Although tax, spending, regulatory policies and special interest
cronyism compounds the problems, all nations of the world operate with
a fiat monetary system. We have been operating with one for 27 years.
It has allowed the financial bubble to develop.
Easy credit and artificially low interest rates starts a chain
reaction that, by its very nature, guarantees a future
[[Page H7471]]
correction. Depending on the particulars of fiscal and monetary policy
and political perceptions, the boom part of the cycle lasts for
unpredictable lengths of time.
The later bad consequences of inflating a currency are certain, no
matter how beneficial the earlier ones seem. The dollar has played a
major roll in the worldwide financial bubble since the dollar is the
reserve currency of the world. It is readily accepted and used to
further inflate most other world currencies.
Noted free market economists Ludwig Von Mises astutely observed in
1940:
No political party and no government has ever tried to make
a conscious deflationary effort. The unpopularity of
deflation is evidenced by the fact that inflationists
constantly talk of the evils of deflation in order to give
their demands for inflation and credit expansion the
appearance of justification.
Since we hear no talk of sound money and we can be assured no
government will deliberately deflate, we should remain vigilant against
the politically popular policy of inflation, the deliberate debasement
of the currency.
Beneficiaries of easy credit demand the policy of currency inflation
continue. Creating money and credit out of thin air gives the illusion
of the perfect counterfeiter, appearing legal and helpful to many. The
power to inflate a currency guarantees a lender of last resort for
risky borrowing, domestic and international. It accommodates deficit
spending, permitting spending on extravagant welfare programs and
unwarranted international militarism, something for everyone.
The welfare poor like it. The welfare rich like it. The foreign
welfare recipients like it. It seems everyone likes it until the
artificial nature of the financial bubble becomes apparent as it is
now.
Fiat money and its low interest rates cause mal-investment, over
capacity, rising prices in one industry or another, excessive debt and
over speculation worldwide. We have had all of this. The current system
has generated a nearly $30 trillion derivatives market. This is a
modern day phenomenon, having allowed a greater speculative binge than
anything known in financial history. But the current prices signals an
end of an era and it does not bode well for anyone.
The near anarchy in Russia, the food riots in Indonesia, and the
growing recession in Japan are signs of conditions spreading across the
globe. Unfortunately, there is no sign that correct policy will soon be
instituted, anyplace.
Capitalism erroneously is being blamed. No mention is made that no
country today is truly capitalist in following a sound monetary policy.
A lot of lip service is given to free trade but, with only casual
observation, one realizes that which is being promoted as free trade is
internationalism and managed trade through organizations and programs
such as NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, the IMF, the World Bank,
foreign aid, subsidized exports, and a U.N. directed foreign policy.
Economic sanctions by those professing free trade are commonplace and
growing.
Today's protectionists rely on these programs in an effort to outwit
their competitors along with demanding currency devaluations in a
futile effort to enhance exports.
Markets inevitably devalue currencies that have been inflated by the
monetary authorities. The degree depends on the amount of previous
monetary inflation and political perceptions but, on the short run,
countries frequently accelerate the devaluation in a competitive
fashion in an effort to gain a competitive edge against their trading
partners. This is why China, despite the denials, will likely accept
the policy of official devaluation.
But our concerns here in the Congress should be for the dollar. We
should not be so arrogant as to dictate policies to others since we
have no authority to do so, whether it be Japan, Indonesia, Mexico, or
Russia. We should resist this no matter how tempting it might seem. And
we certainly should not use dollars to prop up other currencies or
economies whether it be Mexico or anyone else.
Bailouts compound the problems and encourages others to mismanage
their economies while expecting a bailout for themselves from Uncle
Sam. But most importantly, it undermines the value of the dollar.
Since returning to Congress in January of 1997, I have repeatedly
warned that our monetary policy is seriously flawed and will eventually
lead to a dollar crisis. This, in spite of the fact that the dollar has
been riding high in American bonds, and up until recently our stock
markets have been a haven for the ravaged world financial markets.
Foreign Central Banks for years have been willing holders of our
dollars, helping to finance our profligate ways, diminishing price
inflation here at home, by buying up more dollars than our own central
bank. But conditions are changing. In spite of many reasons for capital
to flow into dollars assets in the last few years, foreign central
banks have dumped $85 billion of their U.S. bond holdings. Considering
our large negative trade balance, it is not a surprise to see this
happening. And as this dumping of U.S. dollars accelerates, more
pressure will be put on the dollar.
What can we expect from our illustrious central planners, the Federal
Reserve? Just as difficult as it is for an addict to gradually cut back
on drugs, economic planners refuse to accept the cutting back of credit
creation the markets have become addicted to. Long life may be
dependent on sound medical advice and drug abstinence, but feeling good
on the short run drives the addict.
Likewise, an economy feels good by perpetuating for as long as
possible the easy credit that brought us the good times in the first
place while the long life of the currency, the economy, and the
political system causes little concern. Because there is little
interest for the long term in Russia and East Asia, chaos and political
strife has prevailed. This we cannot afford in the United States.
Today, essentially all politicians, economists, and investors are
strongly urging the Fed to do what they do best, inflate the currency,
arguing that a liquidity crisis must be avoided at all costs. All that
is required, they say, are low interest rates. But this can only be
achieved by creating new money even faster, and M3 is already growing
at a 9 percent annualized rate. This is inflation and the source of the
problem. It appears the Fed is ready to accommodate.
Central planning, Soviet style, is a known failure. But we have not
yet given up on our type of central planning through a powerful and
secretive central bank that dictates interest rates and amounts of
credit available to the system. Fine tuning and economic management has
been left to the Fed. It is at its pinnacle of power under, ironically,
a once gold standard, free market proponent, Alan Greenspan who leads
it.
Let there be no doubt about it. The good times came with the generous
credit creation and low interest rates. And Greenspan will yield to the
politicians' pressure to continue the process. Turning off the money
spigot and allowing the markets to work will never be seriously
considered.
But eventually, the markets will rule. Credit creation may lower
rates for a time, but when confidence is undermined, an inflation
premium will emerge and rates will rise regardless. Lack of demand for
loans in Indonesia and elsewhere in East Asia has not lowered rates. In
a country with a collapsing currency, rates can and will rise
especially if inflating the money supply is the tool of choice in an
effort to stimulate the economy.
Inflating the money supply presents a great danger to the future of
the dollar and the economy and our political system.
{time} 1815
The worldwide financial bubble is like nothing ever witnessed before
and it is collapsing. The Y2K problem will compound our problems, not
to mention the instability of the U.S. presidency.
It is time to consider the fundamentals underlying our financial and
economic system. The welfare state is unsustainable as are our
worldwide commitments to bail out everyone and to intervene in every
fight, even those that have been ongoing for hundreds if not thousands
of years.
A limited government, designed to protect liberty and provide for a
national defense is one that could be easily managed with minimal
taxes, but it
[[Page H7472]]
would also require that we follow the advice of the founders who
explicitly admonished us not to ``emit bills of credit,'' that is paper
money, and to use only silver and gold as legal tender.
We need to lay plans for our future because we are rapidly
approaching a time of crisis and chaos. We surely do not want to leave
the solution to FEMA and presidential executive orders.
Let me quote from a famous economist who was writing in 1966 about
the Great Depression:
The Fed succeeded, but it nearly destroyed the economies of
the world in the process. The excess credit which the Fed
pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market,
triggering a fantastic speculative boom. Belatedly, Federal
Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and
finally succeeded in braking the boom.
But it was too late; by 1929 the speculative imbalances had
become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp
retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business
confidence. As a result, the American economy collapsed.
Great Britain fared even worse, and rather than absorb the
full consequences of her previous folly, she abandoned the
gold standard completely in 1931, tearing asunder what
remained of the fabric of confidence and inducing a worldwide
series of bank failures. The world economies plunged into the
Great Depression of the 1930s.
With a logic reminiscent of a generation earlier, statists
argued the gold standard was largely to blame for the credit
debacle which led to the Great Depression. If the gold
standard had not existed, they argued, Britain's abandonment
of gold payments in 1931 would not have caused the failure of
banks all over the world. The irony was that since 1913, we
had not been on a gold standard, but on what may be termed a
mixed gold standard; yet it is gold that took the blame.
Further quoting from this economist from 1966:
But the opposition to the gold standard in any form, from a
growing number of welfare state advocates, was prompted by a
much subtler insight: the realization that the gold standard
is incompatible with chronic deficit spending, the hallmark
of the welfare state. Stripped of its academic jargon, the
welfare state is nothing more than a mechanism by which
governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members
of a society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes. A
substantial part of the confiscation is effected by taxation.
But the welfare statists were quick to recognize that if they
wished to retain political power, the amount of taxation had
to be limited and they had to resort to programs of massive
deficit spending, i.e., they had to borrow money, by issuing
government bonds, to finance welfare expenditures on a large
scale.
Under a gold standard, the amount of credit that an economy
can support is determined by the economy's tangible assets,
since every credit instrument is ultimately a claim on some
tangible asset. But government bonds are not backed by
tangible wealth, only by the government's promise to pay out
of future tax revenues, and cannot be easily absorbed by the
financial markets. A large volume of new government bonds can
be sold to the public only at progressively higher interest
rates. Thus, government deficit spending under a gold
standard is severely limited.
The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for
the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to
an unlimited expansion of credit. They have created paper
reserves in the form of government bonds which, through a
complex series of steps, the banks accept in place of
tangible assets and treat them as if they were an actual
deposit as the equivalent of what was formerly a deposit of
gold. The holder of a government bond or of a bank deposit
created by paper reserves believes that he has a valid claim
on a real asset. But the fact is there are no more claims
outstanding than real assets.
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to
protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is
no safe store of value. If there were, the government would
have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case for
gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his
bank assets to silver or copper or any other good, and
thereafter declined to accept checks for payment for goods,
bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and
government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim
on goods.
The financial policy of the welfare state requires that
there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect
themselves.
This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades
against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the
hidden confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this
insidious process. It stands as a protector of property
rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in
understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold
standard.
The economist who wrote this in 1966 was Alan Greenspan. He was right
then. He is wrong now. Deliberate debasement of a currency cannot
assure perpetual wealth, only hardship, the type of hardship we are now
witnessing in East Asia and spreading around the world, moving now into
Central and South America. And we here in the United States follow the
same policy, and we are vulnerable no matter how beneficial and how it
appears that we are doing today.
Congress has an explicit constitutional responsibility in the area of
money and finance, and we must assume this responsibility. Secretive
plans by a central bank to manipulate money and credit with the
pretense of helping us is unacceptable, and before the trust in the
dollar is lost we should work diligently to restore soundness to our
monetary system. Without trust, the current system cannot last, and
there is every reason to believe that the disintegration of trust
throughout the world can and will spread to this country.
It is an obligation on our part, Members of Congress, to look into
this matter, study it and at least be prepared for the problems that we
will have to confront. We cannot continue with the system that we have.
That is what the markets are telling us today. The worldwide financial
crisis is not a figment of anybody's imagination, it is real, and we
are reading about it every day and it threatens the life savings of
every single American.
The value of the currency is crucial to protecting the assets of all
retirees. This issue, I believe, is one of the most serious issues that
we as Members of Congress have the responsibility of looking into and
confronting and doing something about it. But as long as we accept the
notion that the central planner of this country, the Federal Reserve,
remains totally secret, without true supervision by the Congress, we
are derelict in our duty.
It is up to us to do something. And as the crisis worsens, I believe
it will become more apparent that our responsibility to look into this
is quite evident.
____________________