[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 93 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8087-S8088]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SCHEDULE
Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, this morning, under a previous order, the
Senate will debate the motion to waive the Budget Act with respect to
the Daschle amendment, with a vote occurring on the motion at 10 a.m.
Following that vote, the Senate will continue consideration of the
very important agriculture appropriations bill, with the hope of
finishing the bill as soon as possible this evening, or as early as
possible this week. And I am very proud that my senior colleague from
Mississippi, Senator Cochran, will be doing his usual very good job in
handling this important bill. Therefore, Members should expect rollcall
votes throughout today's session of the Senate, with the first vote at
10 a.m.
For the remainder of the week, it is hoped the Senate will complete
several important appropriations bills--at least agriculture, HUD-VA,
and legislative. That would be a very positive movement and would give
us an opportunity to address other important issues.
Members are reminded that we have the second in the Leader Lecture
series this evening. I will be honored to introduce our former majority
leader, Senator Baker. That will be held tonight at 6 p.m. in the old
Senate Chamber.
Also, on Wednesday morning at 10 o'clock, there will be a Joint
Meeting of Congress in the House Chamber to receive an address from the
President of Romania.
I urge my colleagues to come to our lecture series session this
afternoon with Senator Baker. I know it will be interesting and, as
usual, filled with good wit and good humor, and will be very
informative about his views of the Senate and where we have been and
where we are going. The next speaker in the leader series is scheduled
to be Senator Byrd of West Virginia. I believe it is in September.
Mr. KENNEDY. Mr. President, I wonder if the leader would yield for a
question.
Mr. LOTT. I will be glad to yield, Mr. President.
Mr. KENNEDY. I was listening to the leader's outline for the
remainder of the week and the proposals, and I had not heard the
scheduling of the Patients' Bill of Rights. I know that the leader
talked with the Democratic leader. I was wondering if he could give us
any further information about what the scheduling prospects would be
for that very important piece of legislation, particularly since the
HUD appropriations has that as an amendment on it. What could the
leader tell us about the prospects of going to a debate on this
legislation?
Mr. LOTT. I have been indicating all year that the Senate was going
to take this issue up, and beginning June 18 I sent suggested unanimous
consent agreements to Senator Daschle. He and I talked yesterday. We
are working together on that issue. We fully expect that probably early
next week we will turn to this issue. We have not worked out the exact
time or the exact procedure. But we had a good discussion yesterday,
and we will continue to have that discussion.
I would like for us to do it where we have the Patients' Bill of
Rights as the issue that is pending, with Senator Kennedy's bill as one
of those, obviously, that would be offered, and the task force bill
that has been put together by Senator Nickles, and others, and not tie
up appropriations bills. We have the people's work to do. The
appropriations bills keep the Government running. They fund our farm
programs, they fund our veterans programs, they fund our housing
programs, they fund our parks and Interior, Commerce, State, and
Justice. The Senator knows the list. So we need to go ahead with those
appropriations bills, and then we will turn to the Patients' Bill of
Rights in a reasonable period of time.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that I may proceed with my
leader time so that I can make a statement with regard to the committee
hearings on the investigation with regard to the satellite exports to
the People's Republic of China.
[[Page S8088]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Allard). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________