[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 93 (Tuesday, July 14, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H5412]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RUSSIAN MATTERS RELEVANT TO THE UNITED STATES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 21, 1997, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Weldon) is
recognized during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania. Madam Speaker, last evening I gave a
keynote speech at the John F. Kennedy School of Harvard University to a
group of 25 Duma members from Russia, parliamentarians who were here
for 2 weeks of orientation in the ways of our operation of the American
democracy, our Congress and our system of government. It was an eye-
opening experience, and I wish them well as they spend the next 2 weeks
learning more about America and our democracy.
Working in Russian issues as I do, I have two other facts I would
like to bring to the attention of my colleagues. One is a very positive
development in Russia, and we have all watched with a great degree of
concern as this emerging democracy over the past several years has
evolved in giving people additional rights and freedoms.
One of my good friends, Aleksei Yablokov, who has testified twice
before Members of this Congress and our subcommittees on issues
involving the environment, nuclear contamination and small nuclear
bombs, unfortunately had an incident where one of the Russian
publications, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, wrote an article about Mr. Yablokov
calling him a traitor because he came before the U.S. Congress and told
in a very open setting about his concerns that Russia had, in fact,
built small nuclear suitcase bombs, that these bombs might not be
accounted for.
Mr. Yablokov sued this publication and just recently, in fact last
week, the Moscow Municipal Court ruled in favor of Aleksei Yablokov,
ordered the newspaper, the Gazeta, to print a public retraction by the
9th of September, 1998, and to pay Yablokov 30,000 rubles because of
this libel case. It is a credit to the Russian system that an
individual with the integrity of Aleksei Yablokov can sue and
successfully win compensation for wrongs committed by the Russian
media, and for that I applaud Russia.
The second issue concerns me, Madam Speaker, because during the
recent break one of my good friends, a member of the State Duma from
the our home is Russia party, Lev Rokhlin was assassinated. He was the
Chairman of the Duma Committee on National Security. I had met with him
on numerous occasions, and while I in many cases did not agree with his
political positions, I respected him. He was a retired Russian general,
someone who was known for committing himself and his political
leadership to support for the troops, for their quality of life.
{time} 1300
Lev was also one of the most outspoken critics of Boris Yeltsin. In
fact, last year he called publicly for Yeltsin to be impeached. For
these calls, Lev was removed from his position as chairman of the Duma
Defense Committee. He was involved more recently in investigating
whether or not Russian oil companies took money for use in the
Caucasus, to be used to buy weapons, instead of being used for the
people and for the Russian government.
There are suspicions that Lev Rokhlin was assassinated because of his
outspoken comments. The official line out of Moscow is that Lev was
killed by his wife, a wife who shot him in a fit of anger. But Lev's
children have publicly come out and said that is not the case, that Lev
was assassinated, and that his wife had to say what she did because she
also was told she would be assassinated.
In addition, Yuri Markin, a lawyer that worked with Rokhlin, said
that he believed that there was an assassination attempt on his life
the same night Lev Rokhlin was killed. Mr. Markin claims Lev was
assassinated because he in fact was revealing things that were going on
inside of Russia that were not legal and that in fact involved
organized crime.
I encourage, Madam Speaker, the Russian government to fully
investigate, as Boris Yeltsin has promised, the unfortunate and
untimely death of Lev Rokhlin, so we can, as we have in the case of the
environmentalists winning the money from the slanderous article by the
Russian newspaper, so that we can have peace of mind that Lev Rokhlin
was not killed by some organized criminal element in Russia because of
what he was saying and because of the job that he was performing as a
member of the State Duma.
The Russian people understand this issue. In fact, at Lev's funeral
last week over 10,000 Russian citizens came out in force. Most of them
have a suspicion that Lev was in fact assassinated by forces other than
his wife.
I would ask our administration to lend its support to my call for the
Russian government to have a full accounting as to the circumstances
and facts surrounding the death of Duma Deputy Lev Rokhlin.
____________________