[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 78 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H4573-H4574]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEFENDING THE INTEGRITY OF THE CENSUS BUREAU
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 21, 1997, the gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Maloney) is
recognized during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mrs. MALONEY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I applaud my colleague from
the other side of the aisle, the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf),
for his very important statement. He is absolutely correct.
Today I rise to defend the integrity of the Census Bureau.
Repeatedly, in an argument over a fair and accurate census, the
opponents of accuracy have suggested that they would support the use of
modern technology if they could be assured that the process would not
be manipulated for political purposes.
Perhaps Jim Hubbard, the representative of the American Legion said
it best at last week's meeting of the Secretary's Census 2000 Advisory
Committee. He said that the only way that the census numbers could be
manipulated
[[Page H4574]]
would be if the professionals in the Census Bureau did it. He went on
to say that he did not believe that that was possible.
Mr. Hubbard is absolutely right, and the opponents of an accurate
census should be ashamed of themselves for attacking the Census Bureau
like that. Never in the almost 100 years of the Census Bureau has there
been a breach in the integrity of that organization.
Just after Pearl Harbor, the President of the United States asked the
Census Bureau for a list of the names and addresses of Japanese living
in America. The Census Bureau refused. During the 1970s, President
Nixon did not like the fact that the rate of poverty was increasing
during his administration, and put pressure on the Census Bureau to
change the numbers. The Census Bureau refused.
The reputation of the Census Bureau is unassailable, and the
opponents of an accurate census do themselves and the country a
disservice to suggest otherwise.
Today, the Atlanta Journal tries to make this case once again. They
admit that scientific methods will make the census more accurate. They
acknowledge that if the count shows a population shift that favors one
party or the other, it should stand. But then they claim that only the
most optimistic could believe that the numbers would not be manipulated
by the politicians.
{time} 1300
On that, they are dead wrong. Anyone who has any knowledge of how a
census works, and how the plans for 2000 work, know that the only ones
who could manipulate the numbers are the professionals in the field or
in the headquarters of the Census Bureau. There is not now, and there
has never been, any evidence to suggest that those professionals would
abandon their professional scientific judgment.
As my Members are all aware, I am sure, my colleagues and I have been
destroying, sacrificing the American forests, my colleague, the
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Miller) and I have, in defense of our
positions on the census. He is fond of circulating editorials attacking
the census and I have sent out literally dozens in suppport of a fair
and accurate census.
Mr. Speaker, I hope that today the gentleman resists the temptation
to use the Atlanta Journal editorial for a partisan battle, but rather
joins me in defense of the professionals at the Census Bureau. The
Atlanta Journal suggests that only the ``blissful optimistic'' could
believe that the census process is protected from political
manipulation by the professionals at the Census Bureau. I hope that the
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Miller) will join me in telling the Atlanta
Journal that the professionals at the Census Bureau are our best hope
of a census that is free of politics and as accurate as possible,
regardless of how our battle turns out.
____________________