[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 70 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H4030]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INDIA AND PAKISTAN'S RECENT NUCLEAR DETONATIONS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. McKeon). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Guam (Mr. Underwood) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. UNDERWOOD. Mr. Speaker, 3 weeks ago India detonated five nuclear
devices, a course of action that it has not followed for 24 years since
its first nuclear test in 1974. A week ago Pakistan, too, detonated
five devices. This was Pakistan's first testing ever. Through the
irresponsible actions of both India and Pakistan, two more nations of
the world have declared themselves nuclear weapons states. In the
course of these critical 2 weeks, our planet has returned towards the
days of nuclear peril, the likes of which have not been seen since the
most tense days of the Cold War.
To be fair, both nations gave what were seemingly plausible reasons
for their nuclear arms program. For India, Prime Minister Vajpayee
stated that its nuclear development was due to the fact that it was
surrounded by two hostile neighbors. One, which has clashed with India
in three wars this century, engaged in a subversive war in the Indian
states of Jammu and Kashmir and has engaged in a provocative ballistic
missile program, and the other neighbor, the PRC, a declared nuclear
weapons state, has fought against India along its northern border.
{time} 1800
Pakistan claims that India provoked it. Pakistan, a nation of 132
million, has been in the shadow of its much larger neighbor since the
partition that divided the subcontinent and created both nations in
1947. Fearful of its larger neighbor's intentions, Pakistan began its
nuclear program clandestinely after the Indian test of 1974.
But, Mr. Speaker, the real issue here is not who did what to who.
Both nations can point to a litany of reasons why they should be
suspicious of each other. While the two nations are but 50 years old,
their shared cultural history spans thousands of years, and we know
that their grievances do as well.
Today, South Asia is on the brink of a nuclear arms race. Yesterday,
the New York Times reported that India's defense budget has been
increased by 14 percent. In addition, the Indian Department of Space's
budget was increased by 62 percent and the Indian Atomic Energy
Commission by 68 percent. You can be sure that the military accounts on
these two agencies received the lion's share of this increase. In all
likelihood, Pakistan is sure to match these increases in their own
nuclear and military programs.
The tragedy in this spiraling arms race is that many millions of
impoverished and illiterate men, women and children of Pakistan and
India are being left out in the cold as scarce resources are being
spent on ballistic weapons and nuclear missiles.
Since its adoption, both India and Pakistan have never been party to
the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty; and, despite the fact that 149
nations have endorsed it, both have refused recently to endorse its
recent renewal. Their citing of the so-called inequity of the CTBT,
which does not require the five declared nuclear states to abandon
their nuclear programs, rings hollow in light of their recent actions.
Indeed, India has long called for complete worldwide nuclear
disarmament. Yet regardless of India's perceived security threats, it
has never had to follow this course of action. Equally, Pakistan missed
a golden opportunity to take the high road by not performing nuclear
tests in response to India's. Despite efforts by the Clinton
administration, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif decided to follow
India on the path towards nuclear bliss and strategic uncertainty.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to strongly protest the actions of the
governments of India and Pakistan. Nuclear weapons are not the answer.
These tests were an act of extreme violence, and the testing of nuclear
weapons have opened a Pandora's box in South Asia. Through this
violence they show the world how meek they truly are, for it is the
emboldened and brave who choose the path of peace.
I ask all my colleagues to join me in sending India and Pakistan a
strong message of disapproval and to support the President in his use
of economic and military sanctions.
Mahatma Gandhi once said: ``Nonviolence is the first article of my
faith. It is the last article of my faith. But I had to make my choice.
I believe nonviolence is infinitely superior to violence, forgiveness
is more manly than punishment, strength does not come from physical
capacity, it comes from indomitable will. We have better work to do, a
better mission to deliver to the world.''
I sincerely hope that both Pakistan and India remember the words of
Gandhi. The prayers of humanity rest on the hope that the millions of
India and Pakistan will find a way to live together peacefully in the
next century. We know the horrors that nuclear weapons can bring, and
that cannot be the road to peace.
____________________