[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 65 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H3591-H3592]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MARRIAGE TAX ELIMINATION ACT
(Mr. WELLER asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. WELLER. Mr. Speaker, the question is pretty basic: Why should we
pass the marriage tax elimination act. And I think the best way to
answer that question is with a series of questions.
Do Americans feel that it is fair that the average married working
couple pays more in taxes just because they are married?
Do Americans feel that it is fair that 21 million married working
couples with two incomes pay more in taxes than an identical working
couple that lives together outside of marriage, in fact, on average
$1,400 more?
Is it right that our Tax Code actually provides an incentive to get
divorced? That is the only way that you can avoid the marriage tax
penalty today.
It is not fair, it is not right, it is absolutely wrong that our Tax
Code punishes 21 million married working couples just because they are
married.
[[Page H3592]]
Now $1,400 in the south suburbs of Chicago, that is real money. That
is 1 year's tuition at Joliet Junior College. That is 3 months of day-
care at a local day-care center. That is real money for real people in
Illinois in the south suburbs.
There is no more unfair provision in the Tax Code. Let us eliminate
the marriage tax penalty. Let us eliminate it now.
Mr. WELLER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to highlight what is arguably
the most unfair provision in the U.S. Tax code: the marriage tax
penalty. I want to thank you for your long term interest in bringing
parity to the tax burden imposed on working married couples compared to
a couple living together outside of marriage.
In January, President Clinton gave his State of the Union Address
outlining many of the things he wants to do with the budget surplus.
A surplus provided by the bipartisan budget agreement which: cut
waste, put America's fiscal house in order; and held Washington's feet
to the fire to balance the budget.
While President Clinton paraded a long list of new spending totaling
at least $46-$48 billion in new programs--we believe that a top
priority should be returning the budget surplus to America's families
as additional middle-class tax relief.
This Congress has given more tax relief to the middle class and
working poor than any Congress of the last half century.
I think the issue of the marriage penalty can best be framed by
asking these questions: Do Americans feel its fair that our tax code
imposes a higher tax penalty on marriage? Do Americans feel its fair
that the average married working couple pays almost $1,400 more in
taxes than a couple with almost identical income living together
outside of marriage? is it right that our tax code provides an
incentive to get divorced?
In fact, today the only form one can file to avoid the marriage tax
penalty is paperwork for divorce. And that is just wrong!
Since 1969, our tax laws have punished married couples when both
spouses work. For no other reason that the decision to be joined in
holy matrimony, more than 21 million a year are penalized. They pay
more in taxes than they would if they were single. Not only is the
marriage penalty unfair, it's wrong that our tax code punishes
society's most basic institution. The marriage tax penalty exacts a
disproportionate toll on working women and lower income couples with
children. In many cases it is working women's issue.
Let me give you an example of how the marriage tax penalty unfairly
affects middle class married working couples.
For example, a machinist, at a Caterpillar manufacturing plant in my
home district of Joliet, makes $30,500 a year in salary. His wife is a
tenured elementary school teacher, also being home $30,500 a year in
salary. If they would both file their taxes as singles, as individuals
they would pay 15%.
MARRIAGE PENALTY EXAMPLE IN THE SOUTH SUBURBS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machinist School Teacher Couple Weller/McIntosh II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted Gross Income........................ $30,500 $30,500 $61,000 $61,000
Less Personal Exemption and Standard $6,550 $6,550 $11,800 13,100 (Singles x 2)
Deduction.
Taxable Income............................... $23,950 $23,950 $49,200 $47,900
(x .15) (x .15) (Partial x .28) (x .15)
Tax Liability................................ $3592.5 $3592.5 $8563 $7,185
Marriage Penalty $1378 Relief $1378
Weller-McIntosh II Eliminates the Marriage Tax Penalty
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they chose to live their lives in holy matrimony, and now file
jointly, their combined income of $61,000 pushes them into a higher tax
bracket of 28 percent, producing a tax penalty of $1400 in higher
taxes.
On average, America's married working couples pay $1,400 more a year
in taxes than individuals with the same incomes. That's serious money.
Millions of married couples are still stinging from April 15th's tax
bite and more married couples are realizing that they are suffering the
marriage tax penalty.
Particularaly if you think of it in terms of: a down payment on a
house or a car, one year's tuition at a local community college, or
several months worth of quality child care at a local day care center.
To that end, Congressman David McIntosh and I have authored the
Marriage Tax Penalty Elimination Act.
The Marriage Tax Penalty Elimination Act will increase the tax
brackets (currently at 15% for the first $24,650 for singles, whereas
married couples filing jointly pay 15% on the first $41,200 of their
taxable income) to twice that enjoyed by singles; the Weller-McIntosh
proposal would extend a married couple's 15% tax bracket to $49,300.
Thus, married couples would enjoy an additional $8,100 in taxable
income subject to the low 15% tax rate as opposed to the current 28%
tax rate and would result in up to $1,053 in tax relief.
Additionally the bill will increase the standard deduction for
married couples (currently $6,900) to twice that of singles (currently
at $4,150). Under the Weller-McIntosh legislation the standard
deduction for married couples filing jointly would be increased to
$8,300.
Our new legislation builds on the momentum of their popular H.R. 2456
which enjoyed the support of 238 cosponsors and numerous family, women
and tax advocacy organizations. Current law punishes many married
couples who file jointly by pushing them into higher tax brackets. It
taxes the income of the families' second wage earner--often the woman's
salary--at a much higher rate than if that salary was taxed only as an
individual. Our bill already has broad bipartisan cosponsorship by
Members of the House and a similar bill in the Senate also enjoys
widespread support.
It isn't enough for President Clinton to suggest tax breaks for child
care. The President's child care proposal would help a working couple
afford, on average, three weeks of day care. Elimination of the
marriage tax penalty would give the same couple the choice of paying
for three months of child care--or addressing other family priorities.
After all, parents know better than Washington what their family needs.
We fondly remember the 1996 State of the Union address when the
President declared emphatically that, quote ``the era of big government
is over.''
We must stick to our guns, and stay the course.
There never was an American appetite for big government.
But there certainly is for reforming the existing way government does
business.
And what better way to show the American people that our government
will continue along the path to reform and prosperity than by
eliminating the marriage tax penalty.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we are on the verge of running a surplus. It's
basic math.
It means Americans are already paying more than is needed for
government to do the job we expect of it.
What better way to give back than to begin with mom and dad and the
American family--the backbone of our society.
We ask that President Clinton join with Congress and make elimination
of the marriage tax penalty . . . a bipartisan priority.
Of all the challenges married couples face in providing home and
hearth to America's children, the U.S. tax code should not be one of
them.
Let's eliminate The Marriage Tax Penalty and do it now!
which is better?
Note: The President's Proposal to expand the child care tax credit
will pay for only 2 to 3 weeks of child care. The Weller-McIntosh
Marriage Tax Elimination Act, HR 2456, will allow married couples to
pay for 3 months of child care.
which is better, 3 weeks or 3 months?
CHILD CARE OPTIONS UNDER THE MARRIAGE TAX ELIMINATION ACT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Average Weekly Weeks Day
Tax Day Care Care
Relief Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriage Tax Elimination Act........... $1,400 $127 11
President's Child Care Tax Credit...... 358 127 2.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________