[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 55 (Wednesday, May 6, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H2922]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 2310
CHAIRMAN BURTON APOLOGIZES FOR HANDLING OF HUBBELL TAPES BUT REFUSES TO
ADMIT ERROR
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Gilchrest). Under a previous order of
the House, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Conyers) is recognized for
5 minutes.
Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, today we have learned that the Chairman of
the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight has fired his
chief investigator and apologized to his fellow Republicans for any
embarrassment caused by his actions in releasing distorted summaries of
telephone conversations between Mr. Hubbell and his wife.
If the chairman now recognizes that the actions taken by his
committee were wrong, the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton) also owes
an apology to Mr. and Mrs. Hubbell as well as the President and the
First Lady. The release of those summaries as well as the tapes
themselves represents something that may be truly unprecedented in the
House of Representatives: the elevation of partisanship over the
sanctity of the privacy of conversations between a husband and wife.
This is such a profound affront to most people's sensibilities and
the values that we hold dear that it raises new questions about whether
the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton) can or ought to continue to
lead that committee's investigation into alleged campaign finance
violations.
Chairman Burton's continuing release of the private telephone
conversations of Mr. Hubbell, including conversations with his wife and
his attorney, appear to represent a serious abuse of government power
intended to humiliate Mr. Hubbell because of his prior association with
the Clinton administration.
Have we really reached the point where we think it is appropriate to
publicly broadcast intimate conversations, most of which have nothing
to do with the allegations of campaign finance violations, between a
man and his wife? If we are concerned about family values, Congress
should support the privacy of marital relationships, not make them
public.
Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Pennsylvania.
Mr. KANJORSKI. I would say to the gentleman from Michigan, we know
that in prior Congresses you had the occasion to chair this committee
of the House. Can you tell us from your personal experience of having
served in the Congress more than 30 years any recollection on your part
of the conduct of this particular chairman of this committee in the
investigation of such a serious matter?
Mr. CONYERS. Well, we do not have enough time to discuss the conduct
of the chairman of the committee, but I can tell you that never in any
committee can I recall to the Members of the body that we went into
privacy and violated the spirit of privacy laws in the way that they
have been done now. And there was a curious coincidence between the
release of information from the special prosecutor and the release of
these tapes. The chairman, a friend, his own chief counsel, advised him
not to release the tapes, but he did so anyway. The Speaker of the
House of Representatives publicly stated that a third party should
screen the tapes for privacy issues before further releases were made.
What did the committee do? It continued to release more tapes.
So almost daily, the impression continues to grow that the gentleman
from Indiana (Mr. Burton) or his committee is simply out of control. If
the chairman's goal is simply to get at the truth, then there was no
need to doctor the tapes.
Considering all of this, along with the chairman's recent public
statement that he was after, quote-unquote, the President, President
Clinton, how can the important investigative work of the committee lead
to any findings that will be accepted as legitimate by the public?
I would appeal to the higher instincts of the gentleman from Indiana
(Mr. Burton) to apologize to the Hubbells and to the President and to
the First Lady.
____________________