[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 45 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3456-S3457]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROTOCOLS TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY OF 1949 ON ACCESSION OF POLAND,
HUNGARY, AND CZECH REPUBLIC
______
JEFFORDS EXECUTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2304
(Ordered to lie on the table.)
Mr. JEFFORDS submitted an executive amendment intended to be proposed
by him to the resolution of ratification for the treaty (Treaty Doc.
No. 105-36) protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on the
accession of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. These protocols
were opened for signature at Brussels on December 16, 1997, and signed
on behalf of the United States of America and other parties to the
North Atlantic Treaty; as follows:
At the appropriate place in section 3 of the resolution,
insert the following:
( ) United states government discussions with foreign
governments regarding possible further enlargement of nato.--
(i) Findings.--The Senate finds that--
(I) the President has consistently stated that the current
round of accession to the North Atlantic Treaty will not be
the last and that the door to membership will remain open;
(II) the following nine Partnership for Peace countries
have begun the formal application process to join NATO:
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia;
(III) the following 15 countries have sought a closer
relationship with NATO by joining the Partnership for Peace:
Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Finland, Georgia,
Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan; and
(IV) Croatia has expressed interest in NATO membership;
(ii) Annual reports.--Prior to the deposit of the United
States instrument of ratification, and annually thereafter,
the President shall submit a report to the Senate on the
status of discussions concerning NATO membership for
Partnership for Peace countries and other countries that have
expressed interest in NATO membership, including--
(I) the expected timetable for those countries to meet the
criteria for NATO membership; and
(II) a discussion of how the functioning of NATO would be
altered if those countries were included.
Mr. JEFFORDS. Mr. President, today I am submitting an amendment to
the resolution to ratify the accession of Poland, Hungary, and the
Czech Republic to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). This
amendment addresses future new membership in the alliance.
28 countries in central Asia and eastern Europe that have applied for
NATO membership or may aspire to join at a future date when they can
meet NATO criteria. Today we are considering extending the NATO
security umbrella to only three countries--Poland, Hungary, and the
Czech Republic. It is important that we have a clear understanding that
the expansion process may go much further than this initial round.
In January 1994, the Administration adopted the Partnership for Peace
program to provide a framework for NATO's evaluation of states that are
considered to be candidates for alliance membership. In addition to the
first three countries invited to join NATO, nine other Partnership for
Peace countries have begun the formal application process for
membership--Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, and the Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia.
Moreover, another 15 countries have expressed an interest in NATO by
joining the Partnership for Peace. These countries include Armenia,
Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Finland, Georgia, Kazakstan, Kyrgystan,
Moldova, Russia, Switzerland, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
Although not associated with Partnership for Peace, Croatia has
expressed hope that they too will be admitted some day.
The extensive territory covered by these NATO hopefuls begs for more
information on the nature and mission of the alliance in the future. My
amendment would require an annual report to the Senate on United States
Government discussions with the governments of each of these countries
on their possible accession. The reports would include the expected
timetable for those
[[Page S3457]]
countries to meet the criteria for NATO membership and how the
Administration believes the functioning of NATO would be altered if
they were to become a member.
Just how far are we willing to extend the NATO alliance? I am not
questioning whether Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic deserve to
become alliance members. All three have made remarkable gains since the
end of the Cold War. But in the future, other of these 25 nations will
meet the criteria to join NATO and may be no less deserving of
membership. Now is the time for the Senate to begin thinking about the
long-term indications of a decision to open NATOs doors to the East.
____________________