[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 34 (Tuesday, March 24, 1998)]
[House]
[Pages H1417-H1418]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE MISUSE OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Bob Schaffer of Colorado). Under a previous
order of the House, the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Burton) is
recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, last week the President
reportedly asserted executive privilege over conversations the
President had with his longtime aid Bruce Lindsey as well as
conversation the First Lady had with White House aide Sidney
Blumenthal. This is the first time since President Richard Nixon,
during Watergate, that a President has asserted executive privilege in
a criminal proceeding. This stunning misuse of executive privilege is
one of the White House's many delay tactics designed to drag out
investigations.
As the New York Times editorialized this morning, Mr. Clinton's
attempt to block grand jury testimony by two important White House
aides, Bruce Lindsey and Sidney Blumenthal, is an alarming attempt to
extend presidential power. Even former Clinton advisor George
Stephanopoulos recognizes the absurdity of this claim of executive
privilege when on This Week with David Brinkley he said, ``They cannot
win this fight on executive privilege. It has been tried before in the
Whitewater case and eventually they turned over the documents.'' That
was a quote from This Week on March 22, 1998.
The President initially raised executive privilege with the Committee
on Government Reform and Oversight, my committee, in a deposition of
Bruce Lindsey last fall. The President's White House counsel directed
Bruce Lindsey not to answer questions regarding conversations Lindsey
had with the President about campaign contributor James Riady.
When we challenged the White House on these claims, the President's
counsel informed the committee last week that the President would not
assert these claims over Mr. Lindsey's conversations. It is important
to note that the committee could have held Mr. Lindsey in contempt for
refusal to answer the questions if the committee determined that there
was no basis for a valid claim of privilege.
The President's former White House counsel, Lloyd Cutler, wrote in a
1994 executive privilege memo, quote, ``In circumstances involving
communications relating to investigations of personal wrongdoing by
government officials, it is our practice,'' the White House's practice,
``it is our practice not to assert executive privilege either in
judicial proceedings or in congressional investigations and hearings.''
End quote.
The President is not following his own order on executive privilege
when it comes to the grand jury. Since these proceedings are all behind
closed doors, the White House raises frivolous arguments to delay the
proceedings. In the light of day with Congress the White House has
backed down.
Executive privilege is supposed to be used only rarely when national
security would be significantly impaired, conduct of foreign relations
would be impacted, or the performance of the President's constitutional
duties would be impacted.
This is not Bosnia, this is not the Middle East. These are scandals
about possible personal wrongdoing by government and political
officials. It has been White House policy since the Kennedy
administration not to invoke executive privilege when allegations of
wrongdoing are at issue. In contrast to Mr. Clinton, President Reagan
declined to claim executive privilege over any matters in Iran-Contra
where sensitive foreign policy decisions and negotiations were at
issue. Executive privilege is not supposed to be used as a shield
against responding to criminal proceedings. This is a clear misuse of
the executive privilege.
As George Washington University Professor Jonathan Turley recently
stated, quote, ``It is ironic to see the extent to which the Clinton
administration has adopted executive privilege arguments far beyond
those made by the Nixon administration.'' End quote.
Mr. Speaker, this administration and the President has no basis to
claim executive privilege on matters before the grand jury that Mr.
Starr is conducting, and, Mr. Speaker, I believe they
[[Page H1418]]
are only doing this to extend the investigation, to drag it out, so
that it eventually wears out the American people and they are able to
hide behind that.
So, Mr. Speaker, I think this is something that should be stopped. I
think the President should not claim executive privilege, he should get
on with the investigation, he should make a clean breast of all this
before the American people so that the American people know the facts.
____________________