[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 30 (Wednesday, March 18, 1998)]
[House]
[Page H1282]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1500
STOP PLAYING POLITICS WITH SENIORS' HEALTH CARE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Kingston) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. KINGSTON. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Lucille Harris lives in the First
District of Georgia. She is 69 years old. For the past 3 years she has
been somewhat worried about her health care, affectionately known as
Medicare, because she knows that in April of 1995 the Medicare trustees
said Medicare is going bankrupt and that Congress needed to act to
preserve and protect it. We tried for many years to protect it and
preserve it; but, unfortunately, politics got in the way.
Then, last year, we finally came up with a bipartisan solution which
the House passed, the Senate passed and the President signed into law.
We did do some good Medicare reform. We gave our seniors a choice of
plans. We cut fraud and abuse. We increased spending from $5,000 to
$7,000 per person.
In addition to that, we said that States are required to cover people
who have fallen through the cracks; to come up with something for
people who were not Medicare-eligible, like the 51-year-old man from
Vermont that I talked to last night; people who cannot get coverage
through the standard health care market. The bill required that States
come up with plans, each State, to protect these people.
The second thing that it did along that line is it said that we would
set up a bipartisan Medicare committee; and the bipartisan committee,
which is chaired by a Clinton-appointed Democrat Senator, would address
the long-term solvency needs of Medicare as more and more baby boomers
retire and use this coverage. We decided it was more important to
protect Medicare for the next generation, not just the next election.
So, Mr. Speaker, having made this great and difficult bipartisan
progress, why is it that the President has now ignored that legislation
and his own commission? Why is he willing to risk Medicare because of
election year politics? Why is it that if it is profitable to lower
Medicare eligibility and it does not cost the system, why is it the
private sector is not already providing that coverage?
Mr. Speaker, I am afraid the President is again playing politics with
our seniors' very important health care plan. We need to protect and to
preserve it. We do not need to play politics with it. Medicare deserves
bipartisan support. People like Mrs. Harris and millions and millions
of Americans, perhaps one's mother or father or grandparents, they
deserve better.
Mr. President, do not monkey around with our seniors' health care.
Let us continue to work on a bipartisan basis to protect Medicare. Let
us see what the bipartisan commission with the President's chairman has
to say before we go changing the plan and incurring unnecessary risks
to our seniors' health care plan.
____________________