[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 29 (Tuesday, March 17, 1998)] [Extensions of Remarks] [Pages E384-E385] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] LET STARR SHINE ______ HON. GERALD B.H. SOLOMON of new york in the house of representatives Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, it is tragic enough that doubts abound about the integrity and motivations of many of our elected officials in the eyes of the people of this country. It is even more unjust when those doubts are planted by people we should trust. Recently, the Clinton Administration has deflected the public's attention away from the accusations against the President and toward Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr. All of the president's people are repeatedly attacking Mr. Starr and distracting him from doing his job. What makes this a tragedy is the fact that Mr. Starr is merely performing the duties legally delegated to him. Kenneth Starr is a man of impeccable integrity. He should be allowed to continue his investigation without undue interference or political attacks. In that way only, will he be able to discern the truth. I have enclosed two relevant editorials. The first was written by four outstanding former attorneys general, and was published on March 11 in the Wall Street Journal. The second article was found in The Poughkeepsie Journal, a Gannett newspaper that serves some of my constituents in Dutchess County, New York. [From the Wall Street Journal, Mar. 11, 1998] Let Starr Do His Job (The following statement was issued last Thursday by four former U.S. attorneys general. A related editorial appears nearby) As former attorneys general of the United States, we oppose the Independent Counsel Act. We believed in the past, and we believe now, that the United States Department of Justice is capable of investigating all criminal and civil matters involving the United States government. We also believe that the Independent Counsel Act raises serious constitutional issues involving, among other things, separation of powers and due process. However, we also believe in the rule of law. In Morrison v. Olson, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Independent Counsel Act is constitutional. Moreover, in 1994, after the law had lapsed, Congress reauthorized the Independent Counsel Act, and President Clinton signed it into law. Therefore, the Independent Counsel Act is today the law of the land, and it must be enforced. As former attorneys general, we are concerned that the severity of the attacks on Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and his office by high government officials and attorneys representing their particular interests, among others, appear to have the improper purpose of influencing and impeding an ongoing criminal investigation and intimidating possible jurors, witnesses and even investigators. We believe it is significant that Mr. Starr's investigative mandate has been sanctioned by the Attorney General of the United States and the Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Further, Mr. Starr is effectively prevented from defending himself and his staff because of the legal requirements of confidentiality and the practical limitations necessitated by the ongoing investigations. As former attorneys general, we know Mr. Starr to be an individual of the highest personal and professional integrity. As a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Solicitor General of the United States, he exhibited exemplary judgment and commitment to the highest ethical standards and the rule of law. We believe any independent counsel, including Mr. Starr, should be allowed to carry out his or her duties without harassment by government officials and members of the bar. The counsel's service can then be judged, by those who wish to do so, when the results of the investigation and the facts underlying it can be made public. Griffin B. Bell, [[Page E385]] Attorney General for President Jimmy Carter. Edwin Meese III, Attorney General for President Ronald Reagan. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush. William P. Barr, Attorney General for President George Bush. ____ [From the Poughkeepsie JOurnal, Feb. 28, 1998] Let Starr Do His Job Spin doctors in Washington have apparently performed successful surgery on President Clinton's reputation--his approval ratings are soaring with the angels. But Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's numbers are down in the cellar. The steady beat of the president's people, all saying the same thing, has had the obviously desired effect--it's distracted the attention of the American public away from questions of Clintonian wrongdoing, and onto a special prosecutor supposedly running amuck. Clinton's people loudly proclaim Starr really is overstepping his bounds in his investigations of the president. If he really were, there would be grounds for dismissal by the judges who appointed Starr. Or Attorney General Janet Reno, or the president himself could. But nobody's moving to dismiss the special prosecutor. They're just making lots of noise on television about him. Fortunately, the one person whose attention should be on questions of presidential wrongdoing, is. Starr is simply doing his job. The major issue is not whether Clinton had affairs with Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones or anyone else--though that certainly is a significant moral matter that he may be forced to address, if the allegations turn out to be true. The major issue is whether the president obstructed justice. Whether he committed perjury and urged others to do the same. And whether evidence was tampered with, and witnesses bought off. That is a significant legal issue that could drive him out of the White House. We must, of course, presume Clinton is innocent, unless he is proven guilty. He deserves that constitutional privilege as much as any American. It's also wrong, lacking proof, to paint Kenneth Starr as the guilty party. He's just doing his job. Maybe his investigation will come to nothing. Maybe not. But let him take as much time as he needs to do that job and discern the truth. The nation deserves truth. Not spin. ____________________