[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 19 (Tuesday, March 3, 1998)]
[Senate]
[Page S1290]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
SANCTITY OF THE BALLOT
Mr. COVERDELL. Mr. President, yesterday's Wall Street Journal
lead editorial entitled ``Sanctity of the Ballot'' should be a wakeup
call for America's citizens. Sadly, we can no longer assume public
officials tasked with protecting your vote are able to do so. The fact
is, passage of the Motor Voter Act has led to growing incidences of
election fraud in communities large and small, and the problem is
getting worse all the time.
The editorial highlights an important new national organization, the
Voting Integrity Project (VIP), which was formed in 1996 in response to
the growing abuses highlighted by the Journal. VIP is a non-profit,
non-partisan coalition of citizens and civic groups. It organizes and
trains citizens to protect the integrity of the vote in their own
community. It also investigates and litigates important election fraud
cases, including constitutional issues. It is the only independent,
national organization performing this important work.
Mr. President, VIP has learned that it is nearly impossible to
overturn elections once they have been certified and places its
emphasis accordingly, in pro-active programs run by the citizens
themselves. Indeed, American voters need to wake up to the harsh
reality of today's election process and begin to equip themselves,
through organizations such as VIP, to guard the sanctity of their
communities' elections and their vote.
I ask that the text of the editorial be printed in the Record.
The editorial follows:
[From the Wall Street Journal, Mar. 2, 1998]
Sanctity of the Ballot
In a rush to make it as easy as possible for citizens to
exercise their right to vote, the country has created lax
registration and voting procedures that could call into
question a close election any number of states. The 1983
federal Motor Voter law requires states to allow people to
register to vote when they get a driver's license, even
though 47 states don't require proof of legal US residence
much less citizenship for such a license. ``We have the
modern world's sloppiest electoral system,'' warns political
scientist Walter Dean Burnham.
Media and political elites pooh-pooh such concerns, but
they are genuine and growing. The House of Representatives
has just dismissed an election challenge by former Rep. Bob
Dornan of California. But buried in the news that Rep.
Loretta Sanchez would keep her seat was the conclusion of a
House task force that 748 illegal votes had been cast in an
election decided by only 979 votes.
The year long investigation established 624 ``documented''
cases of non-citizens voting. Another 124 voters cast
improper absentee ballots. An additional 196 votes may well
have been illegal, but only circumstantial evidence existed.
``In the end of the day,'' says GOP task force member Rep.
Robert Ney, ``Bob Dornan was right--there were illegal
voters.'' In the Sanchez race they represented close to 1% of
all votes cast. The danger is that if this is tolerated, it
will only get worse.
In the wake of the Sanchez-Dornan dispute, Rep. Steve Horn,
a California Republican, called for a vote on a pilot program
to combat fraud in five large states. Local and state
officials would be allowed, but not required, to check
citizenship records with Social Security and the Immigration
and Naturalization Service. If they couldn't verify
citizenship, the voter would have to prove his or her status
or risk being dropped from the rolls. The program included
privacy protections and a requirement that it be ``uniform,
nondiscriminatory, and in compliance with the Voting Rights
Act of 1965.''
This sensible and sensitive proposal doesn't unduly trample
on immigrant rights. Almost half the states already ask for
all or part of the Social Security number to register to
vote. But Democrats, fresh from Ms. Sanchez's triumph,
practically accused Rep. Horn of reinventing the poll tax and
literacy tests of the Jim Crow era. ``It is a shame, it is a
disgrace,'' said Rep. John Lewis, a veteran of the civil
rights movement.
In the end, the bill won a 210-200 majority, but it failed
because it was brought to the floor under a rule requiring a
two-thirds majority, Rep. Horn hopes to have a vote under
normal rules within a month. He points to a growing body of
evidence that the potential for vote fraud is growing, noting
some in the shadow of the U.S. Capitol itself.
In Washington, D.C. an astonishing one of every six
registered voters can't be reached at their address of
record. The city has lost 100,000 people since 1980, but
registration has shot up to 86% of eligible voters from only
58%. Nationally, the average registration rate is only 66%.
Felons, dead people, non-residents and fictitious
registrations clog the rolls in Washington, where anyone can
walk up and vote without showing I.D.
Across the Potomac River in Virginia, Robert Beers, the
voter registrar of prosperous Fairfax County, says the Motor
Voter law has increased the number of registered voters, but
turnout has actually fallen in recent elections. ``There is
no question in my mind that we have registered people who
aren't U.S. citizens,'' Mr. Beers told the Washington Times.
``Nobody worries about the rolls until you get to the
election that's decided by three votes. I wish they would pay
attention to it before it gets to that point.'' He is backing
a state bill to require voters to show some type of photo
I.D.
Last month Mississippi's legislature passed a motor voter
law, but Governor Kirk Fordice issued a veto because it
lacked a voter I.D. provision. ``Vote fraud is an equal
opportunity election stealer,'' he says. His concerns about
improper registrations are echoed elsewhere. The Miami Herald
has found that 105 ballots in last year's disputed mayoral
election were cast by felons. Last month a local grand jury
concluded that ``absentee ballot fraud clearly played an
important part in the recent City of Miami elections.'' This
``called into question the legitimacy of the results.''
In San Francisco, the Voting Integrity Project has filed
suit to overturn a referendum that approved a new stadium.
They cite evidence of actions by city and stadium officials
to tilt the results toward a pro-stadium vote. The scandal
has already been marked by the registrations of the city's
election supervisor and Edward DeBartolo, chairman of the San
Francisco 49ers.
Everyone supports the right to vote, but an equally
important right is the guarantee of elections that are fair
and free of fraud. Right now a growing number of states can't
guarantee the integrity of their results, and that inevitably
will lead to an increasing cynicism and disenchantment with
the democratic process.
____________________