[Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 7 (Thursday, February 5, 1998)]
[Senate]
[Page S444]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONDEMNING CLINIC BOMBING
Mrs. BOXER. Mr. President, earlier today, I submitted a resolution,
Senate Resolution 173. It is very straightforward. It condemns last
week's tragic bombing of a reproductive health services clinic in
Birmingham, AL. As most of us know, this vicious and unprovoked attack
killed a police officer and critically injured a clinic worker. We
already know that clinic worker lost one eye, and I watched her
anguished husband talk about the possibility that she might have an
operation on the other eye as well.
I am very proud that this resolution that I have submitted is
bipartisan. I submitted it on behalf of myself and Senator Chafee,
Senator Snowe, Senator Mikulski, Senator Jeffords, Senator Lautenberg,
Senator Murray, Senator Bob Kerrey, Senator Collins and Senator
Moseley-Braun.
Last week's attack was the first clinic bombing in the United States
to cause a death, but, unfortunately, it was far from the first
bombing. In recent years, reproductive health services clinics have
been the targets of an unprecedented reign of terror. Last year alone,
clinics in Atlanta, GA, and in Tulsa, OK, were bombed, resulting in
many, many serious injuries.
The reign of terror began with the murder of Dr. David Gunn in
Pensacola, FL, in 1993. A second abortion provider and his security
guard were shot and killed the following year in Florida, and on the
bloodiest day of the antichoice terror campaign, two clinic workers
were killed and five injured in vicious cold-blooded shootings in
Brookline, MA.
All told--all told--over 1,800 violent attacks have been reported at
reproductive health services clinics in recent years. If I succeed in
doing anything with this resolution, it is to make my colleagues aware
that the attacks and the level of violence in those attacks are
increasing every year.
I know that reproductive choice is a contentious issue. It was
decided by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade in 1973. There are people
who agree with the decision; there are people who disagree with the
decision. And believe me, Mr. President, I have the deepest respect for
people who hold a view other than mine. Mine is a pro-choice view. Mine
is a view that holds that Roe v. Wade was a balanced, moderate decision
that weighed the rights of everyone involved and basically says that
previability, a woman has this right to choose, it is a personal
decision and Government isn't involved, but postviability, indeed, the
Government can come in and regulate as long as her life and her health
are protected at all times.
But I think what is key here is that when someone explodes a bomb in
a clinic, this is a violent act. This is not about philosophy, because
violence is not a form of speech. Violence is not a form of speech.
Violence is criminal. Violence maims, violence kills, and violence
hurts the very people who are trying to carry out that cause in a
peaceful manner.
I respect those with a different view, but I have no respect for
anyone in this country, regardless of their view, who ever resort to
violence as a form of speech. This resolution is not about choice, it
is about violence.
I know that there is not a single one of my colleagues who believes
that murder, bombing and terror and acts of intimidation are
appropriate ways to express political views. I know that, Mr.
President. This Congress stands firm on saying if you commit one of
these acts, it is a Federal crime. These bombings are part of a
terrorist campaign, a campaign designed to destroy a woman's right to
choose through violence, making her afraid to go to a clinic maybe just
to get a Pap smear. Maybe it is her only line of health care. Maybe she
wants to find out how she can conceive, so she goes to a clinic. Or
maybe she is exercising her right to choose, which is the law of the
land.
The U.S. Senate must condemn these attacks as strongly and
unequivocally as we condemn other acts of terrorism. When we hear about
other acts of terrorism, whether in America or around the world, we are
down here with a resolution of condemnation. Well, we should be down
here now.
I am proud of the number of cosponsors I have. I invite my colleagues
who may be listening to please join in. You need to be on the side of
protecting the people whom you represent as they exercise their
constitutionally given rights.
In addition to condemning this attack, this resolution expresses the
sense of the Senate that the Attorney General should fully enforce
existing laws to protect the rights of American women seeking care at
these reproductive health care clinics. Again, we passed a law. It is a
Federal crime to do violence at these clinics. We need to enforce that
law. We need to protect these clinics. We need to devote more
resources.
Here is a policeman, alone, unsuspecting, getting caught up in a
bombing of a clinic, dying, leaving his family, all alone, watching a
clinic, and being the victim of an explosive device, a bomb. It may
well be that the people who perpetrated this, perpetrated other
attacks. We don't know that for sure, but we do know one thing. There
was a written message that this isn't where they are going to stop.
There can be no quarter for these people in this country. It is
cowardly to do what they did.
We have a law that says it is a Federal crime to do what they did. We
need to prevent these things from happening by devoting more resources,
and I call on the Attorney General to do that. We can't leave policemen
alone facing these terrorists. We can't leave clinic workers alone
facing these terrorists. We can't leave patients alone facing these
terrorists. We need the help of the Federal Government. We pay taxes
for that. This is an explosive device. This is not only breaking one
Federal law, but more than one Federal law.
So I am proud, again, to be joined by my distinguished colleagues in
offering this resolution. I plan to speak with both leaders, Leader
Lott and Leader Daschle, about setting aside some time to condemn this
violence, to stand up for the people of this country and say, whatever
your view, we respect it; however, violence will not be tolerated in
this country.
I think if we did this in a bipartisan way, it would send a clear
signal to anyone in our country who would even consider making violence
a form of speech.
I thank the Presiding Officer, and I yield the floor.
The Senator from Florida.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Florida.
____________________