[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 152 (Tuesday, November 4, 1997)]
[House]
[Page H9925]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EAGLES NEST WILDERNESS EXPANSION
Mrs. CHENOWETH. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
Senate bill (S. 588) to provide for the expansion of the Eagles Nest
Wilderness within the Arapaho National Forest and the White River
National Forest, CO, to include land known as the Slate Creek Addition.
The Clerk read as follows:
S. 588
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SLATE CREEK ADDITION TO EAGLES NEST WILDERNESS,
ARAPAHO AND WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FORESTS,
COLORADO.
(a) Slate Creek Addition.--If, before December 31, 2000,
the United States acquires the parcel of land described in
subsection (b)--
(1) on acquisition of the parcel, the parcel shall be
included in and managed as part of the Eagles Nest Wilderness
designated by Public Law 94-352 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 90
Stat. 870); and
(2) the boundary of Eagles Nest Wilderness is adjusted to
reflect the inclusion of the parcel.
(b) Description of Addition.--The parcel referred to in
subsection (a) is the parcel generally depicted on a map
entitled ``Slate Creek Addition-Eagles Nest Wilderness'',
dated February 1997, comprising approximately 160 acres in
Summit County, Colorado, adjacent to the Eagles Nest
Wilderness.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from
Idaho [Mrs. Chenoweth] and the gentleman from American Samoa [Mr.
Faleomavaega] each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Idaho [Mrs. Chenoweth].
Mrs. CHENOWETH. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
(Mrs. CHENOWETH asked and was given permission to revise and extend
her remarks.)
Mrs. CHENOWETH. Mr. Speaker, S. 588 is a noncontroversial bill
affecting Forest Service lands in the district of the gentleman from
Colorado [Mr. McInnis] which passed the House earlier this year as H.R.
985. I want to thank the gentleman from Colorado [Mr. McInnis] and the
gentleman from New York [Mr. Hinchey], the subcommittee ranking member,
for their cooperation with passage of this measure.
This bill provides that a 160-acre parcel at Slate Creek in Summit
County, CO, will be added to the Eagles Nest Wilderness and
administered as part of the wilderness area if the land is acquired by
the United States within the next 4 years.
The Slate Creek parcel is proposed for acquisition by the United
States in a land exchange; however, the current owners are unwilling to
convey the land unless it is added to the Eagles Nest Wilderness and
permanently managed as wilderness. Since the Slate Creek parcel is
surrounded on three sides by the wilderness area, it only makes sense
that it be made a part of the wilderness area if the land is acquired
by the United States.
I urge support for this measure, which does really enjoy broad
support of the Summit County Board of County Supervisors and
Commissioners, the Summit County Open Space Advisory Council, the
Wilderness Land Trust and other interested parties.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
(Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA asked and was given permission to revise and extend
his remarks.)
Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, on today's agenda we have four
previously House-passed Colorado bills. Senate bill 588 expands the
Eagles Nest Wilderness within the Arapaho National Forest and the White
River National Forest to include land known as the Slate Creek
Addition. The House passed this bill in the form of H.R. 985 on June 17
of this year.
To their credit, the owners of this 160-acre parcel want assurances
that their land will be protected as wilderness if acquired by the U.S.
Forest Service. Accordingly, the bill provides that if the United
States acquires the Slate Creek property prior to the year 2000, it
will be included in the Eagles Nest Wilderness.
Mr. Speaker, this is good legislation, consistent with the desires of
both the private property owners and in the public interest. I urge my
colleagues to adopt this measure.
Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back
the balance of my time.
Mrs. CHENOWETH. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentlewoman from Idaho [Mrs. Chenoweth] that the House suspend the
rules and pass the Senate bill, S. 588.
The question was taken.
Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground
that a quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum
is not present.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 5, rule I, and the
Chair's prior announcement, further proceedings on this motion will be
postponed.
The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
____________________