[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 133 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Senate]
[Page S10204]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report House Joint Resolution
94.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
A joint resolution (H. J. Res. 94) making continuing
appropriations for the fiscal year 1998, and for other
purposes.
log exports
Mr. GORTON. I rise for a brief colloquy with, the manager of the
bill. Mr. President, section 104 of the continuing resolution states
that no funds available or authority granted shall be used to initiate
or resume any project or activity for which appropriations, funds, or
other authority were not available during fiscal year 1997. As the
chairman knows, the fiscal year 1997 interior--or is it Omnibus--
appropriations bill included language which prohibited the use of
appropriated funds to review or modify sourcing areas previously
approved under the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief
Act [FRCSRA] of 1990. The fiscal year 1997 language goes on to further
prohibit the use of funds to enforce or implement Forest Service
regulations for this act that were issued on September 8, 1995. As the
chairman is also aware, I have included language in the fiscal year
1998 Interior appropriations bill that clarifies FRCSRA. Am I correct
in my interpretation of the continuing resolution, that the provisions
related to FRCSRA in fiscal year 1997 are extended for the duration of
this CR?
Mr. STEVENS. The Senator is correct in his assessment of the
continuing resolution. If funding and authority were restricted in
fiscal year 1997, then that same funding and authority remains
restricted under this resolution. In this particular case, the language
to which the Senator from Washington refers in fiscal year would be
extended for the duration of the CR.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on the third reading of the
joint resolution.
The joint resolution (H. J. Res. 94) was ordered to a third reading,
and was read for a third time.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The joint resolution having been read for a
third time, the question is, Shall the joint resolution pass? On this
question, the yeas and nays have been ordered, and the clerk will call
the roll.
The legislative clerk called the roll.
Mr. FORD. I announce that the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Leahy] is
absent due to a death in the family.
The result was announced--yeas 99, nays 0, as follows:
[Rollcall Vote No. 261 Leg.]
YEAS--99
Abraham
Akaka
Allard
Ashcroft
Baucus
Bennett
Biden
Bingaman
Bond
Boxer
Breaux
Brownback
Bryan
Bumpers
Burns
Byrd
Campbell
Chafee
Cleland
Coats
Cochran
Collins
Conrad
Coverdell
Craig
D'Amato
Daschle
DeWine
Dodd
Domenici
Dorgan
Durbin
Enzi
Faircloth
Feingold
Feinstein
Ford
Frist
Glenn
Gorton
Graham
Gramm
Grams
Grassley
Gregg
Hagel
Harkin
Hatch
Helms
Hollings
Hutchinson
Hutchison
Inhofe
Inouye
Jeffords
Johnson
Kempthorne
Kennedy
Kerrey
Kerry
Kohl
Kyl
Landrieu
Lautenberg
Levin
Lieberman
Lott
Lugar
Mack
McCain
McConnell
Mikulski
Moseley-Braun
Moynihan
Murkowski
Murray
Nickles
Reed
Reid
Robb
Roberts
Rockefeller
Roth
Santorum
Sarbanes
Sessions
Shelby
Smith (NH)
Smith (OR)
Snowe
Specter
Stevens
Thomas
Thompson
Thurmond
Torricelli
Warner
Wellstone
Wyden
NOT VOTING--1
Leahy
The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 94) was passed.
Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote.
I move to lay that motion on the table.
The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.
Mr. STEVENS. I suggest the absence of a quorum, Mr. President.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________