[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 131 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10067-S10068]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                         ADDITIONAL COSPONSORS


                                 S. 412

  At the request of Mr. Lautenberg, the name of the Senator from North 
Carolina [Mr. Faircloth] was added as a cosponsor of S. 412, a bill to 
provide for a national standard to prohibit the operation of motor 
vehicles by intoxicated individuals.


                                 S. 648

  At the request of Mr. Gorton, the name of the Senator from North 
Carolina [Mr. Faircloth] was added as a cosponsor of S. 648, a bill to 
establish legal standards and procedures for product liability 
litigation, and for other purposes.


                                S. 1042

  At the request of Mr. Graham, the name of the Senator from South 
Carolina [Mr. Hollings] was added as a cosponsor of S. 1042, a bill to 
require country of origin labeling of perishable agricultural 
commodities imported into the United States and to establish penalties 
for violations of the labeling requirements.


                                S. 1114

  At the request of Mr. Jeffords, the name of the Senator from Illinois 
[Mr. Durbin] was added as a cosponsor of S. 1114, a bill to impose a 
limitation on lifetime aggregate limits imposed by health plans.


                                S. 1133

  At the request of Mr. Burns, his name was added as a cosponsor of S. 
1133, a bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-
free expenditures from education individual retirement accounts for 
elementary and secondary school expenses and to increase the maximum 
annual amount of contributions to such accounts.


                    Senate Concurrent Resolution 52

  At the request of Mr. Hollings, the name of the Senator from Arkansas 
[Mr. Bumpers] was added as a cosponsor of Senate Concurrent Resolution 
52, a concurrent resolution relating to maintaining the current 
standard behind the ``Made in USA'' label, in order to protect 
consumers and jobs in the United States.

[[Page S10068]]



                          ____________________