[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 118 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[House]
[Page H7015]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
COMPASSION AND DEMOCRACY GO HAND IN HAND
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 21, 1997, the gentlewoman from North Carolina [Mrs. Clayton] is
recognized during morning hour debates for 4 minutes.
Mrs. CLAYTON. Madam Speaker, the world lost two well-known, highly
respected and dearly loved women in the last week, Mother Teresa and
Princess Diana.
Mother Teresa. Mother Teresa, early in her life, committed herself to
an order of the nunnery and that would have been sufficient in itself,
because she had a high calling, and it was indeed commendable and
honorable that she did that, but that is not the reason she was dearly
loved.
Princess Diana was both titled and wealthy and had style. Again,
those attributes and privileges were advantages for her, but again,
that is not the reason there was such deep love and emotion for her. In
both of their lives, I think we learned that the attribute of
compassion was the quality that people endeared from them, or were
endeared to them because of.
It was their compassion, their ability to reach out, their ability to
be concerned, their ability to embrace others, to reach out beyond
their own points of comfort. It was their ability to support and
embrace the poor, their ability to support and embrace the lepers, to
care enough for the aged or to hug a person with AIDS, their ability to
welcome the unwanted, their ability, or certainly Mother Teresa's
ability, to comfort the dying.
So as we give tribute to their lives, we have an opportunity, as
legislators, to reflect to what extent do we reach out beyond our
ability of comfort?
We are having the opportunity to appropriate resources. Do we
appropriate resources that also will benefit the poor, the hungry; or
have we, as legislators, in the recent years found it very fashionable
to have the poor as a political football, to make them scapegoats for
our frustration? Has it become very fashionable in this land of
immigrants to now have a harsh reality, a harsh attitude? And the
reality of that is to find ways to not extend the full service and
benefit of our country.
In this country where we say equality and access and fairness are
landmarks of our democracy, it has become fashionable to say that
affirmative action is no longer the byword, fair play is only for a few
and privileged.
I think we have an opportunity to reflect, as we reflect on their
lives, what makes this country great. This is a great democracy. It is
great beyond its great defenses. That makes us strong. It is certainly
great beyond our technology and our great wealth. That makes us
competitive and the envy of the world. What makes this democracy great
is its compassion, its ability to open its arms to all of the people.
As we continue our legislative responsibility, I think we have the
opportunity and the privilege, and I hope also the desire and the need
to make sure the appropriations and the promulgation of policies and
laws we make also reach to those who are unfortunate, the poor, the
hungry, the unwanted.
There are two bills that I would commend to my colleagues to
consider. One is Hunger Has a Cure. It simply is a bill now that has
more than 100 cosponsors, and I encourage all my colleagues to consider
it. It simply says that we care enough about those without food to make
sure we provide it.
The second one is to make sure we have equal opportunity for
minorities to have access to agriculture resources to end the
discrimination that has been documented.
My bill simply says, it is agriculture, equity, and accountability.
I commend both of those bills in the spirit of compassion, fairness
of opportunity, what makes this country great in the life of Mother
Teresa and the life also of Princess Diana. It is an opportunity to
remember our caring about people and our compassion.
____________________