[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 104 (Tuesday, July 22, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H5562-H5563]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A DOUBLE STANDARD
(Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA asked and was given permission to address the House
for 1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA. Mr. Speaker, there has been a lot of talk recently
in Washington about the influence of foreign money on Members of
Congress and on the administration. The most recent media reports
indicate that there may have been complicity between the government of
the People's Republic of China and Mr. John Huang to influence our
elections and certain Federal officials of our Government.
Mr. Speaker, my colleagues may have missed a recent report in The
Hill newspaper which reported that as much as $86 million was spent by
foreign governments to lobby and conduct public relations with both
private and public officials of our Government. It is ironic, Mr.
Speaker, that it is perfectly legal for foreign governments to spend
over $86 million to lobby the Congress and the White House, but no one
ever questions the ethical aspects of the process.
So while we are pointing fingers at China for alleged misconduct to
lobby and influence our policymakers, there appears to be a standard
that is confusing to me and I am sure to the American people. I call it
a double standard.
[From The Hill, June 25, 1997]
Foreign States Spent $86 M to Lobby U.S.
(By Robert Schlesinger)
Foreign governments, led by Japan, reported spending in
excess of $86 million on activities including lobbying and
public relations in the United States during the first six
months of 1996, according to filings made to the Department
of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
Overall, foreign interests, working through more than 330
separate registered entities, reported $430,867,734 in
activities reportable under the FARA in the first half of
last year, according to an analysis by The Hill of the
attorney general's report to Congress on FARA filings.
Individuals or groups must register as foreign agents if
they perform certain activities, ranging from lobbying to
trade promotion, on behalf of a foreign entity, such as a
government or corporation.
``The U.S. is definitely uniquely open and user friendly to
official foreign lobbyists from all over the world,'' said
Alan Tonelson of the U.S. Business and Industrial Council
Educational Foundation (USBICEF). ``This situation is not
even close to being reciprocated anywhere.''
The government of Japan, mostly through entities like the
Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), reported spending
at least $17,840,878--more than twice as much as any other
government.
JETRO reported $14,117,208 during the first six months of
1996. Their activities are typically along the lines of
``research in matters concerning foreign trade between Japan
and the U.S.,'' as a filing for JETRO states.
Other countries spent their resources on lobbying or
``monitoring and analysis'' of issues of interest to them.
Mexico, the sixth-largest spending government at $3,576,368,
paid Burson-Marsteller $563,000 for public relations on the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which will be up
for expansion in the near future. Mexico, which has been
wracked recently by charges of corruption and narcotics
problems, also spent a great deal of money on broader PR
efforts to burnish its suffering image.
Burson, which made slightly over $1.2 million over all from
foreign entities, ranked only 11th in line in the 13 law/
lobby/PR firms to gross more than $1 million from foreign
clients.
Most of the other top-spending governments devoted at least
some of their expenditures to tourism-related activities. For
example, the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands, the second and
third largest spending governments at roughly $8 million
each, spent virtually all of their money promoting tourism,
as did Ireland, the number four country.
New York City-based advertising agency DDB Needham
Worldwide pulled in more than $18 million, most of it from
the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia, which
paid them $13,965,723.68.
[[Page H5563]]
New York ad firms O'Leary Clarke & Partners and FCB/Leber
Katz Partners Inc. were second and third respectively, making
slightly over $5 million each from the Cayman Islands
(O'Leary) and Jamaica and the British Virgin Islands (FCB).
Washington law/lobbying firms also fared well. Patton
Boggs, home of super lobbyist and name-partner Hale ``Tommy''
Boggs, pulled in more than $3.5 million from such clients as
Oman, Qatar, the Philippines and Pakistan. Other Patton Boggs
clients who did not pay them during the six month time period
include Hong Kong, Italy, the United Arab Emirates, France,
Germany and Taiwan.
Other law/lobby/PR firms grossing over $1 million with
numerous active foreign clients were Fleishman-Hillard
(including clients from Canada, France, Angola, Turkey,
Northern Ireland and Japan), Cassidy & Associates (France,
Australia, Japan, Saudi Arabia and Taiwan), the Bozell Sawyer
Miller Group (Canada, the Bahamas, Bolivia, Japan and
Indonesia), Arnold & Porter (Canada, Israel, Panama, Turkey
and Venezuela), Burson-Marsteller (Hong Kong, Great Britain,
Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Turkey and Portugal), Washington
& Christian (Antigua & Barbuda, Gabon, Guinea and Nigeria)
and Hogan & Hartson (Canada, France, Panama, Russia, the
Bahamas, Haiti, Japan, Great Britain and Taiwan).
Registerable activities include engaging in lobbying,
``political activities,'' or public relations in the United
States. A foreign agent must also register if he or she
``solicits, collects, disburses or dispenses contributions,
loans, money or other things of value . . .'' This includes
the promotion of trade and tourism.
Furthermore, ostensibly domestic entities don't have to
register with the Department of Justice.
USBICEF's Tonelson noted that many domestic companies have
become almost proxy foreign agents. ``The China trade debate
is a perfect example . . . ``said Tonelson.
He added that, ``the positions that they're lobbying for
hard have become almost indistinguishable from the Chinese
government, and in fact they've become the most effective
voice for the Chinese government.''
So, for example, while the Chinese Embassy paid a paltry
$18,750 to the law and lobbying firm of Jones, Day, Reavis &
Pogue for keeping up on issues like Most-Favored-Nation (MFN)
trade status, groups like the U.S.-China Business Council and
large multi-national corporations lobby the U.S. government
in favor of the MFN renewal.
As of June 30, 1996, 595 active registrants (totaling 2,825
individuals) were registered to represent 871 foreign
principals.
Lobbying, law and P.R. firms grossing over $1 million from foreign
clients
DDB Needham Worldwide.......................................$18,343,333
O'Leary & Clarke & Partners...................................5,139,405
FCB/Leber Katz Partners.......................................5,131,928
International Registries Inc..................................4,709,640
Merkley Newman Harty..........................................3,670,489
Patton Boggs..................................................3,574,939
Fleishman-Hillard Inc.........................................2,619,152
Cassidy & Associates..........................................2,060,465
Bozell Sawyer Miller Group....................................1,786,831
Arnold & Porter...............................................1,614,937
Foreign governments spending over $1 million
Japan....................................................$17,840,878.31
Bahamas....................................................8,722,043.54
Cayman Islands.............................................8,212,662.99
Ireland....................................................5,546,970.00
Marshall Islands...........................................4,376,538.87
Mexico.....................................................3,576,368.31
Canada.....................................................2,716,742.50
Hong Kong..................................................2,569,187.99
Bermuda....................................................2,473,473.71
2,273,449.09.........................................................
____________________