[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 100 (Tuesday, July 15, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H5187-H5188]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CIVILIAN-MILITARY RELATIONS IN GUAM IS BEING FRACTURED
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 21, 1997, the gentleman from Guam [Mr. Underwood] is recognized
during morning hour debates for 5 minutes.
Mr. UNDERWOOD. Mr. Speaker, in Guam and many other American
communities children are at the forefront of our Government policies,
and like many communities, children are also at the forefront of our
relationship with the military, whose large presence on Guam is well-
known to many of the Members of this Chamber. Those in Guam and here in
Washington must understand the dimensions of this history.
The military's recently announced intention to establish Department
of Defense Dependent Schools on Guam will divide an island for which
over the past few decades community leaders, elected leaders, and
military leaders have worked hard to dismantle barriers that force the
perception of two separate communities on Guam. The barriers were
coming down until the military announced that they were returning the
school system on Guam to the pre-World War II era.
The school system prior to the World War II was divided. Military
dependents attended a school called the American School, while local
Chamorro children attended local schools. The naval government's
official policy on education at the time was ``to provide every
possible means to ensure that the children of American residents in
Guam shall not suffer perhaps permanent injury'' because of their
residence on Guam. This was perceived as an indication that those
native to Guam were not good enough.
After World War II, although the school system in name was
integrated, in reality, the districting was manipulated by the Navy to
maintain segregated schools. Although the naval government operated all
of the schools on the island and was thus responsible for the quality
of education on Guam, double standards were maintained. When the
relationship was finally integrated in the 1960's, when I was in high
school and completing my education, and just as the process took time
to heal here on segregation in the United States, so did the feelings
of segregation on Guam. It took years to build relationships between
the civilian and military community on Guam, and now this is being
destroyed.
What we have worked in Guam so hard to dismantle is easily built up
by the military. The military has pursued this issue inexhaustibly.
They call it Operation Bright Vision. Maybe in the shortsighted eyes of
military planners on Guam, this is a bright vision. With the
President's announced initiative of one America to bring together
people of different races, setting up the dynamics to divide the
community on Guam is clearly the wrong vision for all of America.
Rather than bright vision, it is a dark cloud over Guam and the rest of
the United States.
The military will attempt to characterize this issue as a failed
contract. Yes, they did have a contract for monetary payment with the
Government of Guam, but those were for administrative reports. The
Government of Guam high schools are fully accredited; the teachers are
certified and the system has graduated many outstanding doctors,
lawyers, and educators who serve here as well as on Guam. This must be
important to understand.
But the Department of Defense all along, while telling me that they
may establish schools in the fall of 1998, have continued to pursue
this and surprised the entire island by announcing that schools would
be established this fall, in October of 1997.
They did all of this while failing to actively engage local leaders
and education officials. They never talked to them. They let the
contract become the mechanism of the discussion. The whole process is
already symptomatic of a major breakdown between local military
officials and the people of Guam.
Difficult times lie ahead, and this is exactly because of this move.
This effort is hostile in nature. To my knowledge, this may be the
first time that the Department of Defense has established domestic
dependent schools contrary to the desires and warnings of local
officials, local leaders, and the local community. This paves the road
for very difficult times in the military-civilian relationship on Guam.
There is much more at stake here than the quality of education. This
is a relationship issue. It is not just about schools; it is about
military planning. It is more, even more than that. Our relationship is
built upon people relating to other people, and the military will
destroy this with their effort to divide our youth and to promote
separate communities. Guam has to be seen as part of America by our
fellow Americans.
This outrageous move by DOD is hostile in its nature, hostile towards
the local community from whom it wishes to separate, hostile toward the
schools, and hostile toward its outstanding professionals and toward a
people who have heretofore welcomed the military to their homes, its
families, and its lands.
Mr. Speaker, I include for the Record extraneous materials relating
to this topic. These are letters by the current and former Speaker of
the Guam Legislature. Speaker Unpingco characterize the island's
sentiments well. Former Speaker San Agustin outlines the history of
civilian-military relations on this issue.
Office of the Speaker,
Agana, Guam, July 8, 1997.
Hon. Robert A. Underwood, M.C.,
House of Representatives,
Agana, Guam.
Dear Congressman Underwood: I am compelled to write to you
regarding the recent decision by the Department of Defense to
open DOD schools on Guam. Without any consideration of the
social ramifications this would have, DOD has opted to
segregate this community and pull over 2,700 military
dependent school children out of the local public school
system. What kind of message is the Department of Defense
trying to send to the people of Guam?
Attached is a copy of my letter to Rear Admiral Martin E.
Janczak, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Marianas, wherein I
state my concern over this decision on the part of DOD. To
summarize the letter, the plan to open DOD schools on U.S.
soil sends a strong message to the people of Guam that we are
nothing more than second-class citizens in the eyes of the
United States.
I must convey to you the sentiments of this community. The
opening of DOD schools
[[Page H5188]]
is just another sign of an ugly American attitude of treating
Guam as a foreign country when it is convenient and treating
it as a US possession when it suits its needs. This is no
longer acceptable!
Most of all, opening DOD schools will revive racial
tensions on the island. Simply put, this plan implies that
white Americans are smarter than brown Chamorros. May I
remind you that the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown vs.
Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas ruled that racially
segregated schools were unconstitutional because separate
educational facilities are inherently unequal. After years of
living harmoniously, the military will separate our children
and pit them against each other. What good will come out of
all this?
I urge you to review this situation which has a potential
for disaster and find another alternative. Let's work
together on this issue and not against each other. I look
forward to your input regarding this matter of the utmost
urgency.
Sincerely,
Antonio R. Unpingco.
____
July 15, 1997.
The Editor,
Pacific Daily News,
Agana, Guam.
I want to congratulate the Department of Defense
establishment, principally the local Naval and Air Force
command, for finally succeeding in their efforts to restore
it's pre-World War II segregated educational policies on the
island of Guam.
Since the liberation of Guam, the military commands have
consistently pursued it's goal, and that is to have a
segregated educational program for it's military dependents.
I'm sure that there is enough historical documents that will
reveal that at the immediate outset of World War II, a
segregated school was indeed established, principally at the
former Adelup school. During the Guerrero administration the
Adelup school was gradually phased out and integrated with
the Piti Elementary school and other local areas. Please note
that the Piti Elementary School was located at the foot of
Nimitz Hill, thereby accommodating military dependents living
at Nimitz Hill and the people of the municipality of Piti.
Over the years, many accommodations were made for the
military by locating schools either adjacent to or near
military bases. Let me cite a few examples. (1) The Finegayan
Elementary School was located directly across the NAVCOM
station and near the FAA Housing Area to accommodate the
military dependents residing at NAVCOM; (2) The Upi
Elementary School was originally requested by the Anderson
Air Force Base Command to be constructed ``inside'' the
Anderson Air Force Base. Instead of consolidating and
improving the Yigo Elementary School, a compromise was
arrived. The compromise was to build the Upi Elementary
School ``right outside the fence'' approximately 100 feet
distance from the back gate of Anderson Air Force Base; (3)
Truman Elementary School in Santa Rita. This site location in
itself has an interesting historical sequence. It was decided
to build this particular Truman Elementary School right next
to the Apra Heights Housing Area and Naval Magazine Housing
Area and also at the same time near the Santa Rita Village.
It also was used as a ``pawn'' by the Navy's desire to build
an ammunition wharf at Sella Bay. Fortunately Governor
Camacho, during a meeting at the Pentagon (where I was
present) prevailed on the DOD officials to release the school
site and permit us to build the Truman Elementary School;
and gave up their demand for the location of the
ammunition wharf at Sella Bay. Indeed, this was rather
unfortunate, in that the military tried to persuade
GovGuam officials to agree to the Sella Bay ammunition
wharf location in order for the Navy to release the school
site designated as Truman Elementary School.
Government documents will also reveal that the Department
of Defense, pursuant to Public Law 874, ``the School Impact
Aid'', has been consistently ``falling short in compliance''
for full educational impact reimbursements. I'm sure former
Speaker Franklin Quitugua will remember that he tried very
hard, unsuccessfully, to seek full reimbursement from the
federal government for military educational impact efforts
under Public Law 874 for the last 25 years! The Federal
government, having been delinquent for full reimbursement
entitlements under this Public Law 874, the Ada
Administration was persuaded to adopt an alternative source
of financing that is the now so-called DoD Funds in lieu of
the impact Aid funding under Public Law 874. This single
action in itself truly paved the way for DoD to dictate as a
``supplement'' to local funding sources for education. Under
Public Law 874, the funding, which comes under the purview of
the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, is part of
the overall basic budget cost to finance the entire
educational system. The simple action under the Ada-DoD
Funding Contract, gave the DoD the ``unusual authority'' to
either withhold or release such funds under it's military
terms, thereby DoD finally establishing educational standards
for the local educational system.
Having established this position of financial strength, the
DoD, then actively pursued it's original intention to
``establish it's own segregated school'' which they could not
do for over 50 years since 1946.
In addition to the above, the local educational system was
federally mandated under the Organic Act of Guam to educate
all school children on Guam, regardless of their origin,
principally local, military and from our neighboring islands.
And I now wonder, if the DoD impetus, having achieved a
financial strength of dictating it's educational funding,
with a school population significantly divided into 3 basic
groups, that is the local, Micronesians, and the military
dependents, provided the resulting environment.
____________________