[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 95 (Tuesday, July 8, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H4907-H4908]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPENDING EPA STANDARDS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Taylor of North Carolina). Under a
previous order of the House, the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr.
Mascara] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. MASCARA. Mr. Speaker, I was supposed to join the gentleman from
Pennsylvania [Mr. Klink] this evening to talk about the problems
associated with the impending standards to be implemented by the
Environmental Protection Agency.
First of all, I would like to give a historic perspective to
illustrate why I have joined so many of my colleagues in the House of
Representatives to speak about the national ambient air quality
standards. First let me clear the air, no pun intended. I support, as
do many Members of Congress, clean air and a sound environmental policy
in this country. The key word is ``sound.''
I would like to share with my colleagues, Mr. Speaker, a historic
perspective about the 15 years' experience that I had in county
government. During that time I served on the Southwestern Pennsylvania
Regional Planning Commission and during those 15 years I served as
chairman 3 years and also as chairman of the Plan Policy Committee
which had the responsibility of implementing ISTEA, which is the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and the Clean Air Act
amendments of 1990 which were a companion bill. So I had an opportunity
as a county commissioner to see the system from the bottom up and now
as a Member of Congress to see it from the top down. I do have some
experience in dealing with legislation that applies to clean air and
air quality standards.
As a member of the Regional Planning Commission, we covered six
counties, including Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Washington,
and Westmoreland and the city of Pittsburgh. I also served as chairman
of this Plan Policy Committee that had the responsibility of
implementing those two pieces of legislation, including the National
Highway System Act.
This enabled me to have a better understanding of the problems
associated with implementing those standards in southwestern
Pennsylvania. I led a group of county commissioners in 1994 suggesting
that the nonattainment status in southwestern Pennsylvania was
incorrect, and that we as county commissioners and the city of
Pittsburgh council requested that an independent testing firm test the
quality of air in southwestern Pennsylvania to determine whether in
fact we did not reach attainment. We found at that time that some of
the equipment that was used in measuring the quality of air was faulty,
we found that the air quality samples that were taken were taken on the
hottest days of the year. We requested and the Department of
Transportation in Pennsylvania and the Department of Environmental
Resources agreed to permit a testing company, an independent testing
company to measure the quality of air in southwestern Pennsylvania.
{time} 2145
The tests that were done by this independent firm proved our
suspicions that the earlier testing was inappropriate and resulted in
inaccurate test results. The air quality in the Pittsburgh region had
definitely met the air quality standards. The Pennsylvania DER advised
the EPA that southwestern Pennsylvania had met its ozone standards, and
the EPA sat on the new information and never corrected our status from
moderate nonattainment to attainment.
Listen to this. Based on monitoring data between 1989 and 1994,
western Pennsylvania's air quality met or exceeded the national
standards for ozone levels. Apparently the application got lost in the
bureaucratic maze, for it took the EPA over 2 years to respond instead
of the mandated 18-month period. That summer, the summer of 1995,
western Pennsylvania's ozone readings exceeded acceptable levels on
only 9 days. Let me remind you that 1995 was one of the hottest summers
on record.
Yes, we paid the price for clean air that we now breathe, and as I
said earlier we all support clean air. Southwestern Pennsylvania
citizens paid the price, and now they want us to believe the new
standards could eventually put the remaining 100,000 miners out of work
and impact workers in the few remaining jobs we have in southwestern
Pennsylvania.
Mr. Speaker, I remind you that as a part of the 1980's and the
decline in the steel and mining industry that we lost nearly 200,000
manufacturing jobs in southwestern Pennsylvania. And these new air
quality requirements are without a basis of science, and we are asking
the President, and I joined in with several of my colleagues in writing
the President asking him to take another look at the air quality
standards which will be implemented this year.
[[Page H4908]]
____________________