[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 91 (Wednesday, June 25, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H4616-H4617]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1945
HISTORIC VOTE AGAINST OUR VETERANS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Tiahrt). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Mississippi [Mr. Taylor] is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi. Mr. Speaker, tomorrow in Congress
Democrats and Republicans alike will vote for a tax reduction. They are
going to give the wealthiest contributors a big tax break. They are
going to give the smaller contributors a smaller tax break. But when it
comes to those who in my opinion contributed the most to our country,
not with their wallets, but with their lives and with their blood, they
are going to get nothing at all.
I am talking about our Nation's veterans and in particular, our
Nation's military retirees. Mr. Speaker, today, your Congress had the
opportunity to fulfill the promise of free health care for life for our
Nation's military retirees, a promise that has been broken, a promise
that remains broken every day.
Mr. Speaker, out of this entire year-long legislative session, today
was the only day, according to the Parliamentarian, that legislation to
restore to our Nation's military retirees the health care benefits that
they were promised could be brought to the floor for a vote, and today
I tried to do just that.
I am pleased to tell my colleagues that every single Democratic
Member of Congress voted to help our Nation's military retirees, every
single one. I regret to inform my colleagues that every single
Republican Member of Congress, let me repeat this; every single
Republican Member of Congress voted against helping our Nation's
military retirees, even though the bill that would have helped them was
introduced by a Republican, the gentleman from Colorado [Mr. Hefley].
[[Page H4617]]
I am a cosponsor of that bill and I am very proud to do so, because
after all, if it is good for America, it really should not matter
whether it is a Democratic or Republican idea. I am proud to say that
every single Democratic Member of Congress took the same patriotic
approach to Medicare subvention. They supported bringing Medicare
subvention to the floor for a vote, even though the bill's sponsor is a
Republican.
Why then, I ask the people on this side of the room, did every single
Republican vote against it? Why did the 98 Republicans who cosponsored
Medicare subvention vote against bringing it to the floor for a vote,
despite a plea from the Retired Officers Association?
I will read a letter sent to me by the Retired Officers Association:
Dear Representative Taylor: Based on discussions with you,
we understand that you intend to make a motion to defeat the
previous question, and if successful, to offer an amendment
to H.R. 2015, the Budget Reconciliation Act, to allow
Medicare to reimburse the Department of Defense for care
provided to Medicare-eligible service beneficiaries in the
Military Health Services System, a concept we refer to as
Medicare subvention. The Retired Officers Association
strongly supports this initiative.
Medicare subvention is critical to help honor the lifetime
health care commitment. Servicemembers were promised lifetime
health care in return for the extraordinary sacrifices of a
20- to 30-year career in uniform. Now, after several rounds
of base closures, massive personnel reductions, and the
advent of Tricare Prime, most Medicare-eligible service
beneficiaries have lost access to military facilities.
Servicemembers did not equivocate when called upon to serve
this Nation during years of armed conflict. This Nation
should not equivocate on its commitment to provide them
lifetime access to military facilities.
This is the list, and I want to submit it for the Record, of the 98
Members, Republican Members of Congress, who cosponsored this measure,
who will go home and tell their constituents they are for this, they
want to help the military retirees, but when the chance comes, the
once-in-a-year chance comes to put it into action, voted against it:
Hefley, Watts, Norwood, Ensign, Bonilla, Bartlett of Maryland,
Ramstad, Goodlatte, Lewis of Kentucky, Ballenger, Bereuter, Cunningham,
Herger, Stearns, Dan Schaefer of Colorado, Morella, Young of Alaska,
Davis of Virginia, McHugh, Sensenbrenner, Regula, Jones, Skeen,
Scarborough, Riggs, Stump, McCollum, Christensen, Hayworth, Wolf,
McKeon, Hunter, Baker, Saxton, Petri, Sam Johnson of Texas, Shaw, Kim,
Calvert, Bateman, Solomon, who voted against it in Committee on Rules
and on the floor; Shadegg, McCrery, Tiahrt, Foley, Porter, Bilbray,
Pryce of Ohio, who voted against it in the Committee on Rules and on
the floor; Riley, Pombo, Graham, Bono, Canady, Weldon of Florida,
Parker, Metcalf, Wamp.
Mr. Speaker, I will submit the remainder for the Record.
Campbell, Kelly, Hastings, WA, Smith, NJ, Smith, TX, Wicker,
Callahan, Kolbe, Barton, TX, Linda Smith, WA, Granger, LaHood, Collins,
Paxon, Doolittle, Hansen, Linder, Hutchinson, Rohrabacher, Hostettler,
Emerson, Nethercutt, Diaz-Balart, Everett, Weller, Ney, Combest,
Packard, Talent, McInnis, Taylor, NC, Bob Schaffer, CO, Gallegly,
Shimkus, Horn, Chambliss, Chenoweth, Fox, PA, and Gibbons.
Mr. Speaker, I want to remind people that this is the only chance we
are going to get to vote on Medicare subvention. Do not go home for the
Fourth of July parades and tell the veterans you are with them because
they now know, and the Congressional Record will reflect, that when
given the opportunity to do something for them, or do something for
Newt Gingrich, you voted for Newt Gingrich and against our veterans.
Mr. Speaker, I include for the Record the material referred to
earlier during my special order.
The Retired Officers Association,
Alexandria, VA, June 25, 1997.
Hon. Gene Taylor,
U.S. House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Representative Taylor: Based on discussions with you,
we understand that you intend to make a motion to defeat the
previous question, and if successful, to offer an amendment
to HR 2015, the Budget Reconciliation Act, to allow Medicare
to reimburse the Department of Defense for care provided to
Medicare-eligible service beneficiaries in the Military
Health Services System--a concept we refer to as Medicare
subvention. The Retired Officers Association strongly
supports this initiative.
Medicare subvention is critical to help honor the lifetime
health care commitment. Servicemembers were promised lifetime
health care in return for the extraordinary sacrifices of a
20- to 30-year career in uniform. Now, after several rounds
of base closures, massive personnel reductions, and the
advent of Tricare Prime, most Medicare-eligible service
beneficiaries have lost access to military facilities.
Servicemembers did not equivocate when called upon to serve
this Nation during years of armed conflict. This Nation
should not equivocate on its commitment to provide them
lifetime access to military facilities.
Medicare subvention will help honor that commitment while
saving money--a ``win-win'' proposition for Medicare, for
taxpayers and for those who served.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Nelson,
President.
____________________