[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 63 (Wednesday, May 14, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H2648-H2649]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OFFICER BRIAN GIBSON TAX-FREE PENSION EQUITY ACT OF 1997
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from the District of Columbia [Ms. Norton] is recognized
for 5 minutes.
Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, come tomorrow, we will be celebrating the
16th annual National Peace Officers Memorial Day, and the President of
the United States is going to be here on the west front. I am sure,
regardless of party, many of us are going to be out there to honor
slain police officers. It is the culmination of National Police Week,
and I come to the floor this afternoon to encourage my colleagues to do
something more than mourn slain police officers.
I have sponsored the Officer Brian Gibson Tax-Free Pension Equity Act
of 1997. This is a bill that has almost no fiscal consequences, but it
would allow the families of officers killed in the line of duty to
receive survivor benefits tax-free.
We already allow officers who retire on disability to receive their
benefits tax-free. Surely we would want to this year erase the
disparate treatment between officers who still live, but are disabled,
and survivors of officers who have been killed in the line of duty. Is
this small deed merely honorific, or is it necessary?
{time} 1600
I got the idea, Mr. Speaker, when Officer Brian Gibson was killed a
few months ago. I learned that this officer was only 28 years old and
had left infants behind. Then, right after that,
[[Page H2649]]
two more officers were killed. Each had young children, ages 5, 3
months, 3 years. Each of them had been on the police force only a few
years; 3 years, 4 years.
Even though a slain police officer gets generous treatment because he
gets a larger percentage of his pension than he would otherwise get,
even getting half of the pension you have earned when you have only
been on the force 4 or 5 years is not going to pay the mortgage, it is
not going to put the kids through college.
There is going to be a lot of rhetoric tomorrow, as there has been
all week, about our officers who have given up their lives to protect
us, and well there might be, because in a real sense going out on these
streets today is going to war. This is not cops and robbers. It used to
be that. They had a gun, you had a gun. Indeed, our police were able to
take care of what needed to be done.
Today, as we saw in the shootout in California a few weeks ago, they
have outgunned our police officers, or, as in the District in recent
weeks, they are so brazen as to engage in execution or assassination of
police officers.
What do we say to a young widow? If you go to three funerals in a
row, as I have, and you cry and talk about how sorry you are, then what
are you going to do? One of the things I am going to do, I assure the
Members, with another bill that I have written, is to get the Federal
police officers outside of these Government buildings so they give some
aid to the D.C. police, who then can go into the high crime areas and
perhaps protect policemen like Officer Brian Gibson who was not
protected, as he was in the District by himself and alone in a police
car.
If Members want to do something besides talk about it, besides mourn
about it, let us think of these families and take this bill, which has
de minimis cost. I do not think it would even register. I have every
reason to believe it would not. I have done some preliminary checking.
Let us move forward and say we are going to do something this 16th
Annual National Police Officers Memorial Day. We are not going to come
up with remedies that do not work. We will not divide over who is for
gun control or who is not for gun control. We are going to lay down our
weapons. Our weapons are our debating points.
We are going to come together on the proposition that when a police
officer goes out here with his life on the line, and when he gives it
for his community, at the very least we are going to stand up on this
Congress and we are going to say, we are going to take care of your
family. We assure you, we are going to take care of your family.
Since we do not pay for police officers but we do tax them, we
promise that as we do not tax officers who retire on disability, we
will not tax your wife and your children who are left here by
themselves. We will pull back, with almost no cost to this
extraordinarily rich Government, and say, this is our contribution to
the family that has been left behind.
It is a small, I concede, a small point and a small bill, but for
that very reason I think we would want to mark National Police Week
this week with this bill that of course is supported by Members. It is
bipartisan, and I urge support from both sides of the aisle.
____________________