[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 53 (Tuesday, April 29, 1997)]
[House]
[Pages H1956-H1957]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MEDICARE TRUSTEES' REPORT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Florida [Mr. Goss] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. GOSS. Mr. Speaker, last week four Cabinet-level members of the
Clinton administration and the rest of the Medicare trustees released
their annual report on the future of the Medicare Program, something of
great interest to a great many Americans, and unfortunately the
forecast is very bleak. The condition of the part A trust fund has gone
from serious to critical, with only a few years left before flatlining
altogether in this very important entitlement program. It is time for
the White House to get its act together.
Mr. Speaker, 2 years ago, for the first time in the history of the
program, the trust fund paid out more in expenses than it received in
revenues. That was a pretty good indicator something was wrong. Last
year the program lost $25 million a day every day and $9 billion over
the course of the year, another indicator something might be wrong.
This year that figure will climb to at least $40 million a day lost and
almost $14.5 billion for the whole year. We are on the fast track to
bankruptcy, with only a small window of opportunity to avoid a serious
disaster in Medicare part A which so many Americans depend on.
While this projection is undisputed, the call to action from the
White House has not been forthcoming. Yes, the President has moved
toward us in terms of raw numbers, but he has avoided making the tough
choices necessary to truly reform and improve Medicare. In fact, the
President's prescription involves no heavy lifting at all. It just
ambushes the American taxpayer down the road with higher taxes. Where
have we heard that before? By switching the home health portion of
Medicare to Part B without a corresponding increase in the premium to
pay for it, this administration has signaled that its intention is not
to save the program but, rather, to continue to play politics with the
numbers and raise taxes.
But there is good news, and that is why I am here. The good news is
that we can save Medicare as this Congress has done recently. But it is
not going to happen with accounting gimmicks, misguided customer
providers, or vetoes from the White House. Instead we should take a
hard look at what is driving the soaring costs and address them head
on.
We need medical malpractice reform to assure that our precious
resources are not being wasted on defensive medicine. A Stanford study
found that States that have passed some kind of tort reform, like my
home State of Florida, have seen incredible savings in even the most
complicated medical areas. The study confirms what many of us already
knew, excessive litigation serves the trial lawyers primarily, not our
senior citizens.
We can and must increase the number of options available in the
Medicare Program. Every senior should have choices to go beyond the fee
for service or an HMO, options that include things like provider-
sponsored networks and medical savings accounts. Individual choice
should be the hallmark of any reform plan.
Of course, we should always keep our eye on the fraud and abuse that
still
[[Page H1957]]
plagues our system, regrettably. In the last Congress we instituted
tougher penalties for those who cheat the system, and we should pursue
identified ways to do more of that. Representative Quinn's legislation
to establish an inspector general for the program I think is a fine
first step. I hope that we will continue to deter and punish those who
drain our Medicare resources by cheating.
Mr. Speaker, the campaign is over. The demagoguery, the distortions,
the cynical misdirections might have served a political purpose in the
last Presidential campaign, but they did not do anything to save the
Medicare trust fund. The effect dramatically of it in this year's
report has been to exacerbate the problem. As the trustees note, and
again there are Cabinet members among them, ``it is misleading to think
that any part of the program can be exempt from change.'' We have to
fix it.
It is time we heed the trustees' warnings. It is time for structural
reform that saves Medicare not merely until the next election, but well
into the next century because a great many Americans are counting on
it.
Mr. Speaker, I served on the Kerrey commission. We talked about the
entitlement, the well-being of the entitlement programs in our country,
and we discovered that we were on unsustainable trendlines, and this is
just the first of others that are going to follow unless we have reform
of our entitlement programs.
I am proud that Congress did its job. We passed the strength of the
Medicare Act bill in the last Congress. The Senate passed it. President
Clinton vetoed it. Since that veto we have lost almost $20 billion in
revenues in trust fund part A. This adds up to real money, but more
important, it adds up to real anxiety for our senior citizens.
It is time we heard from the White House on this program. The Cabinet
members have spoken, the committee has spoken, Congress has spoken.
Will the President speak?
____________________