[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 49 (Wednesday, April 23, 1997)]
[House]
[Page H1758]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AGAINST MFN FOR CHINA
(Mr. WOLF asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute and to revise and extend his remarks and include extraneous
material.)
Mr. WOLF. Mr. Speaker, the question of MFN will be coming up. I urge
Members to take a look at a recent poll done by the Weekly Standard
which I will put in the Record. This is what Public Opinion Strategies
said:
By an overwhelming margin of 61 to 29 percent, the American people
oppose MFN for China. The other 10 percent did not know.
Sixty-one to twenty-nine percent.
The pollsters asked the respondents: ``Do you support or oppose
continuing most-favored-nation status with China?'' Sixty-one percent
to twenty-nine percent. That is all across the country, in every
region, in all the cities, in the suburbs, on the farms, all political
spectrum, men and women. The fact is even a greater percentage of
women, 67 to 22 percent, oppose MFN.
Let us listen to the American people. The Chinese are persecuting
Christians, they have Christians in jail, Catholic priests, Catholic
bishops, evangelical pastors, persecuting Buddhists and Moslems, and
yet this Congress and this administration is thinking of giving MFN for
China.
I strongly urge Members to read the poll. The American people are
aware. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party ought to be.
Oppose MFN for China.
Mr. Speaker, I include the following editorial for the Record:
[From the Weekly Standard, April 28, 1997]
The Poll Numbers on China: 61-29 Against
The Washington debate over the Clinton administration's
policy of appeasement--pardon us, ``engagement''--toward
China is heating up. It will get even warmer as July 1 nears,
when Hong Kong reverts to Chinese sovereignty after 155 years
as a British crown colony. And there'll be a full boil when
Congress takes up the question of China's ``most favored
nation'' status in American trade law. The fearsome let's-
trade-with-Beijing lobby will twist the arms of congressmen
to shut up about human rights and pass MFN. Wavering
legislators will want to know: Where's the public on this
nettlesome issue? Here's the answer.
At the Weekly Standard's request, the polling firm Public
Opinion Strategies earlier this month reminded 800 Americans
that the MFN designation ``gives the Chinese full trading
privileges with the United States.'' Then our pollsters posed
a question that, if anything, bends over backwards in favor
of engagement.
Some people support MFN ``because they believe it will
promote democracy and free markets in China and help the U.S.
economy.'' Others want to suspend MFN ``because China limits
human rights, sells arms to Iran and pursues an aggressive
foreign policy.'' So do our poll respondents ``support or
oppose continuing most favored nation status with China?''
The result: The American people oppose MFN, overwhelmingly,
by 61 to 29 percent (the other 10 percent don't or gave no
answer). They oppose it in every region of the country. They
oppose it in the cities. They oppose it in the suburbs. They
oppose it on the farm. White people oppose it. Black people
oppose it. Republicans oppose it. Democrats oppose it. Rich
people oppose it. Poor people oppose it. High-school dropouts
oppose it. Ph.D.s oppose it. Married people oppose it. Single
people oppose it. Clinton voters oppose it. Dole voters
oppose it. Perot voters oppose it.
In other words, everyone opposes MFN. And interestingly
enough, no one opposes MFN more than women do; by a whopping
45-point margin, 67 to 22 percent. So on this issue,
President Clinton has a gender gap. He deserves it.
____________________