[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 41 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2870-S2871]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PITIFUL STATE OF OUR LEGAL SYSTEM
Mr. FAIRCLOTH. Mr. President, I take the floor today to discuss an
issue that is serious and becoming more serious every year, and that is
the pitiful state of our legal system. It is becoming harder and harder
and harder to convict anybody of anything. You can catch them on tape,
film them committing the crime, and then you will probably lose it;
they will be found not guilty. No amount of evidence seems to be
sufficient anymore. I think we have reached this sorry and pitiful
state because we have basically let the system be controlled by
lawyers. When you control the legal system by lawyers, you are simply
asking a thermostat to set itself. Defense lawyers are twisting and
bending common sense to let the guilty go free, and they are aided by
judges--in many cases, hand-picked by the trial lawyers. The lawyers
pick the judges.
At every turn, you have lawyers controlling a system that makes no
common sense, except to serve one purpose, which is for their benefit.
The most recent example I can think of is the glaring stupidity
involving the Oklahoma bombing case. First, it has taken 2 years to
bring it to court when the man was caught the day after he did it. Now,
many taxpayers are appalled by the very fact that they are paying for
McVeigh's defense--they are paying for it. They think that is
reprehensible. But they don't realize how much they are paying. If they
did, they would rise up and revolt. It is not just the defense of
McVeigh; it is gold-plated from one end to the other. He has 14--14--
expensive lawyers defending him that the working people of this country
are paying for--14 of them. His chief lawyer, Mr. Jones, says that it
will cost $50 million to defend him. That is his estimate. Now, anybody
that has ever had a lawyer knows they never come in with a low
estimate. They are estimating $50 million to defend him. This is
absolutely offensive to every taxpayer in this country, and it should
be. But this is a typical example of a legal system that is out of
control.
Now, to defend Mr. McVeigh because he blew up the building in
Oklahoma City, his lawyers have traveled literally all over the world.
They have been from Kansas, where he rented the truck, to Jericho. I
don't know why he would have been there. They have been to the
Philippines. These lawyers are traveling at taxpayers' expense. They
have been all over Italy. They have covered every country in Europe and
gone to the West Bank. Nobody knows what they are searching for--maybe
for the real killer, or maybe just enjoying travel at taxpayers'
expense. While they have the killer, they are always looking for
another one. The taxpayers have paid for a TV and VCR for Mr. McVeigh
so he can review the evidence.
Mr. President, to add insult to injury and outrage to outrage, they
moved the trial. So now we, the working people of this country, are
paying $50,000 a week--$50,000 a week--for the living expenses of his
lawyers. When you start talking about the working people, $50,000 every
week for the living expenses of his lawyers--they spent $0.5 million to
remodel the courtroom in Denver for his trial. They couldn't try him at
home. They had to move it to Denver and we spent $0.5 million getting
the courtroom ready for him.
The victims of his crime have had to travel hundreds of miles from
Oklahoma to Denver in hopes that they see that he gets justice. They
are paying for the defense of the man that killed their children. They
are also having to pay for their own room, board and lodging in Denver.
Plus they are paying $50,000 for his lawyers' lodging and board in
Denver. There is no end to it.
How many times do the victims of this crime, or any crime, have to be
made victims again by the very judicial system that they are paying
for? We will be paying for McVeigh's trial long from now in the form of
interest on the debt and the money we borrow to give him $50 million
for his lawyers.
It would be my thought that if McVeigh didn't have the money for his
gold-plated defense, he should not have blown up the building in the
first place.
Mr. President, I suggest that there are a number of things we could
do, and we need to start fixing a system that is broke. And it is
broken bad. We need to change the law that allows criminals to get the
best defense that taxpayers can pay for. That is exactly what they are
getting. I am going to propose legislation putting a cap on the Federal
Defender Program.
I would like to cap what McVeigh is getting right now. But that will
be appealed for years and years. As long as we pay the lawyers, they
will keep appealing for Mr. McVeigh. So he will be out there far into
the future with the people's money. The $50 million figure will run
into $75 million before we get through hearing about him. We need a
comprehensive overhaul of the legal system, and it needs to be done by
nonlawyers. We need to overhaul the legal system and not let a single
lawyer be involved in the overhaul. We need a national commission
composed of nonlawyers to review the judicial system and provide some
commonsense solutions to the problem, and it needs to be made up of
homemakers, regular people, business people, truck drivers, and people
who would bring some practicality to it and not lawyers who would
continue to feather their own nest.
[[Page S2871]]
I think we need a victim's rights amendment to our Constitution. Over
the last 40 years liberal judges have turned our Constitution into the
``Criminal Protection Act.'' The purpose of the last 40 years is to
make sure that every criminal is coddled, pampered, and looked after in
a very proper manner. It is time for it to stop, and the Constitution
has to protect victims as well.
Mr. President, I know that many Senators share what I am talking
about and are frustrated by what we see. I think we need to start on
legal reform, and I think we do need to do it soon.
The first thing that will be said is, ``If you start it, the
President will veto it.'' Well, let him veto it. I think the American
people need to know where the President stands. So if he wants to veto
it, let him do it. If the President says that the regular people of
this country--or if he chooses sides with Ivy League lawyers that never
got a murder case that they couldn't appeal, it is time to bring the
practicality and the common sense of the American people into the legal
system and take it out of the hands of the lawyers. The very idea of
$50 million to defend McVeigh--$50 million, 14 lawyers. Anybody who
would tell me that that isn't an absolutely out-of-control system
simply has lost all common sense themselves.
It is time we put an end to it. I intend to introduce legislation
that will do so.
Mr. President, I thank you. I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Allard). The Senator from North Dakota.
Mr. CONRAD. Mr. President, I would like to start by using my own 5
minutes and at the end of that time go into leader time. If the
Presiding Officer will indicate to me when I have consumed the 5
minutes, I will be grateful for that.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Chair will notify the Senator.
Mr. CONRAD. I thank the Chair.
____________________