[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 31 (Wednesday, March 12, 1997)]
[House]
[Page H932]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF HELMS-BURTON LEGISLATION
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Duncan). Under a previous order of the
House, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. Diaz-Balart] is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mr. DIAZ-BALART. Mr. Speaker, a plea has gone out by the President of
the National Commission, Jose Marti, the National Commission on Human
Rights in Cuba, Professor Amador Blanco Hernandez, for three political
prisoners who are in a very, very difficult situation right now. They
have been on a hunger strike since February 20 because of the brutal,
inconceivably inhumane conditions that they have been facing. One of
them, and I will read their names, Juan Bruno Lopez Vazquez, Herminio
Gonzalez Torna, and one of them, Levin Cordova Garcia, is near death.
Now, Professor Blanco Hernandez is seeking some signs of solidarity
and outrage in the international community. I today remember and my
thoughts go out to all the Cuban political prisoners, but especially to
these three, such dignified representatives of the Cuban people who are
facing that extraordinarily difficult situation, and have had to embark
on hunger strikes to try to get some attention of the world community
so that their conditions will be looked at and pressure will be put on
the Cuban dictatorship so that their conditions can improve.
Mr. Speaker, it has been a year since President Clinton signed the
Helms-Burton law, March 12, 1996. Sometimes it seems difficult to
believe that it has been only a year, considering all that has happened
since. Not just Castro but all those who seek to take advantage of the
degradation and exploitation imposed by the dictator on the Cuban
people received a blow by the adoption of Helms-Burton. With urgency,
those who have invested or who are thinking of doing so in Castro's
feudal, antiworker, slave economy have had to reconsider their actions
or their intentions in light of the risk of being physically excluded
from the world's largest market, the United States.
That is why the European Union, in an act that classifies it as an
unscrupulous merchandiser, has taken its complaint against U.S.
sanctions to the World Trade Organization.
The strongest blow in Helms-Burton against those who seek the
definitive consolidation of the degradation of the Cuban people, of the
oppression and the humiliation that they have to bear at the hands of
the Castro brothers and the handful of their minions who also live the
``dolce vita,'' however, is not what is most discussed and debated
about Helms-Burton. It has nothing to do with the exclusion of
foreigners from the United States who knowingly traffic in properties
stolen from Americans, nor with lawsuits against those traffickers.
What is most painful for those who seek the permanence of the
oppression of the Cuban people is that the United States sanctions
against the dictatorship can no longer be lifted by the President until
there is a genuine Democratic transition on the island.
Castro's defenders and the unscrupulous merchandisers had great hopes
for President Clinton. They saw how he, in coordination with some large
business interests, lifted the embargo on Vietnam and reestablished
diplomatic relations with that country. With normalization of
relations, a wide gamut of credits and other financing possibilities
are opened to those who seek to do business with a recently legitimized
regime.
They sought the same for Cuba. It does not matter that Castro has no
money to buy anything from the unscrupulous merchandisers. The
financing mechanisms would take care of that. That is what they are
there for. That is why those financing mechanisms have money from the
United States taxpayer.
Ever since Helms-Burton, the dreams that some had of being able to
obtain massive financing for lucrative business deals with the Cuban
dictator have gone down the drain. Congress has made absolutely clear
that the President cannot lift the embargo and facilitate credits for
those who seek to profit from deals in Cuba, nor authorize massive
United States tourism to Cuba, until there is a government in Cuba that
respects the Cuban people, a government that liberates all political
prisoners, that legalizes all political activity and that agrees to
hold free and fair elections. That requirement in Helms-Burton, known
as the codification of the embargo, is definitive and will be decisive
in Cuba's salvation.
____________________