[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 24 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1788-S1789]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[[Page S1788]]
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I rise today, as I have in months gone by,
to talk about some of the good things that are happening in Government.
We tend to dwell--because of the negative perception that the press
throws on almost everything that is done here in Washington--on things
that the Government is involved in that are not good. There are things
we do that are good, however, and I want to talk about some of those
things. I want to do this, Mr. President, in an effort to stem the tide
of negativity that has engulfed the perception many Americans have
about their Government. Strident skepticism about our Government seems
to rule the day. I worry about the harm it will do to our country in
the long term.
A recent survey of 1,000 registered voters found that about 63
percent of them did not want their children to be President. This is in
stark contrast to what it was 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago.
If this is the case, where will we find the leaders for future
generations?
There are, in fact, as I have already indicated, many Government
efforts and agencies that serve this country well. Last summer I spoke
on this floor about the National Park Service, which began in the early
part of this century as an idea of President Theodore Roosevelt. The
National Park Service has worked to preserve and protect the remarkable
lands that we call our national parks.
Since Congress established the National Park Service, this agency has
cared for these natural wonders. Today, about 80 years after the
National Park Service was formed, 270 million people will visit our
National Park System.
I am very proud that the most heavily visited entity in our entire
National Park System is in Nevada. The Lake Mead recreational area has
over 10 million visitors every year. Because of the hard work of the
Park Service, these national treasures will be available for all
Americans to enjoy for generations to come.
Another worthwhile Federal agency about which I have spoken is the
Consumer Product Safety Commission. This is a very small agency, but
very effective agency, and it has jurisdiction over more than 15,000
different products. It maintains a constant vigil to seek out and
eliminate harm to the American consumer. For example, after a baby's
death resulting from a faulty playpen right here in the District of
Columbia, the Consumer Product Safety Commission responded quickly by
removing these playpens from stores and issued a nationwide alert to
all consumers.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission most recently made news by
recalling popular fleece clothing because it was found to be
dangerously flammable. At one time, we had a similar problem with
children's pajamas catching on fire. Because of the Consumer Product
Safety Commission, we now have flame-retardant pajamas for our
children.
From investigating reports about unsafe products to protecting our
children from lead poisoning on playgrounds, the Consumer Product
Safety Commission has proven, in my opinion, to be an indispensable and
beneficial Government agency.
Every summer wildfires sweep the Western part of the United States.
About 25,000 brave men and women fight those fires. These self-
sacrificing and hard-working firefighters are coordinated through the
National Interagency Fire Center, which is a joint project of the
Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. These people put
their lives on the line. Hundreds of these men and women parachute out
of the back of airplanes with backpacks weighing almost 100 pounds. We
have hundreds more who propel off helicopters into harm's way in order
to save life, property, and our great natural resources.
We should be proud of this work done by the Federal Government. When
wild fires race across our forests and fields, and the flames threaten
our communities, these brave firefighters risk their lives to keep us
safe.
Today, I want to take the time to recognize the good work of another
Government Agency that takes care of us when we suffer calamities. That
is the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA. Mr. President,
when I was in the other body, one of the committees I served on had
jurisdiction over authorizing what FEMA did. In those days, more than a
decade ago, FEMA got a lot of bad publicity. They have made remarkable
improvements. This organization is one of the best examples of how
Government truly works for Americans.
In late December and early January, northern Nevada experienced the
worst floods in the history of our State. We do not have many rivers in
Nevada, but three tiny rivers in northern Nevada--the Truckee, Carson,
and Walker Rivers-- became raging torrents, washing away people,
animals, and property. While most of America was enjoying the New
Year's holiday, we in Nevada were besieged by the ``Flood of 1997,'' as
were a number of other Western States. When northern Nevadans were
confronted with this devastating damage, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency quickly responded to the short-term and long-term
needs of residents and businesses. With FEMA's help, Nevada is not only
rebuilding, but we are well on the road to recovery.
FEMA has been tremendous. They called on their reserves and utilized
their experts to assist with our devastating farm losses. They were
even able to bring in people that could deal with the losses we had to
tourism.
FEMA is an agency that is used to handling water damage. About 80
percent of the emergencies they deal with in the United States deal
with water damage and floods. They are truly experts at this.
FEMA was established as an independent agency in 1979 when
its original purpose was to deal with nuclear attack. That is no longer
the case. While the Agency once operated within a narrow mandate, it
has since been expanded to handle disasters generally.
Mr. President, this is an agency that recognizes that people who are
hit by floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and other national disasters
are Republicans, Democrats, and independents. This is an agency that
must act on a bipartisan basis. And I think they have done a good job
of doing that.
Due to the present Director, James Lee Witt, who visited Nevada
during the flood disaster, FEMA has become an example of good
government. For example, in an effort to streamline and reduce costs,
FEMA has closed a number of field offices and has drafted a plan to
reduce its internal regulations, which we all dislike, by more than 50
percent. It has become a cost-effective agency which has developed an
innovative, customer-oriented approach to government. Most notably,
from the very first sign of disaster, FEMA works in partnership with
State and local governments, as well as businesses and private
agencies. I can testify to this, as it is precisely what happened in
Nevada. FEMA does not act like some type of monolithic big brother
trying to supersede all local efforts. Everything they do is in
partnership with local government. They also deal with business
concerns. When the New Year's flood struck, FEMA was on the ground
within hours to begin the coordination of relief efforts in Nevada. In
conjunction with local officials, FEMA conducted preliminary damage
assessments. They did not do it on their own. They did it with local
officials. Based on FEMA's initial findings, the President declared 6
of our 17 counties disaster areas, and one major city in Nevada as a
disaster area. After the declaration, FEMA began some more good work
coordinating numerous assistance efforts in the State.
In a disaster, FEMA becomes the central point of contact for a wide
range of emergency responses, including planning, mitigation, and
recovery. Aid offered by the Agency ranges from low-interest loans,
even cash grants, to advice on how to mitigate damage from future
disasters.
FEMA's basic disaster recovery assistance falls into three main
categories. No. 1 is human services, or individual assistance, which
provides aid to individuals, family, and business owners. No. 2 is
infrastructure and public assistance, which helps State and local
governments pay for emergency services and repair damages to facilities
such as roads, bridges, buildings, and utilities.
During the flood, when it was still raging, I went into an area
outside of
[[Page S1789]]
our capital, Carson City, to meet with county commissioners. One of the
big problems we had with the Carson River, which is a wild river with
no dams, was with a levy that had been washed away. This levy had been
there for as long as anyone could remember, but no one claimed
ownership of it. It did not belong to the county. It did not belong to
the State. The farmers did not claim it, and neither did the Indians.
It was essential, however, that levy be reconstructed. So the county
said, ``We will take responsibility.'' As soon as they did that, FEMA
was there to begin work on how to reconstruct the levy, which is so
essential to prevent damage from Nevada's spring thaws.
The third disaster assistance category is hazard mitigation
assistance, which provides funding for reducing future losses in
disaster areas. We have an area along the Truckee River where FEMA is
considering buying all of the land. It is likely that this area will
suffer another flood, so why should we continue to put those residents
in harms way? The homes should not have been built there, and FEMA's
efforts to buy this land is a fundamental part of hazard mitigation
assistance.
Additionally, one of the first things FEMA does in an afflicted
community is activate what they call the National Teleregistration
Center. This sounds like a fancy name, but it is basically a telephone
bank which begins taking applications for assistance within hours of
the President's declaration. In Nevada, we have had over 3,000 people
register for assistance by using this telephone number. Moreover, as of
just a few days ago, FEMA had issued millions of dollars in housing
checks to Nevadans; approved nearly a half a million dollars in
individual and family grants in Nevada; obligated almost $5 million in
public assistance grants to repair and restore Nevada public
facilities; and issued $15,000 in disaster unemployment assistance to
Nevada residents left jobless.
One reason FEMA works so well in a partnership with local governments
is because, when there is a disaster, they do not come in and say we
are going to take care of everything. The reason cooperation is coming
from State and local governments is because they are required to come
up with 25 percent of the costs of these repairs.
Amidst all the chaos of this devastating flood, FEMA was a source of
hope, assistance, and relief. In time of disaster, when communities are
reeling from devastation caused by nature or humans, it is vital than
an emergency management infrastructure is ready to respond immediately.
FEMA works in cooperation with States and nonprofits to pick up where
their efforts left off. This efficient Federal Agency also works to
cover what residents' insurance does not.
Since the potential for flooding in some areas is still extreme,
FEMA's efforts in hazard mitigation planning are invaluable. I have
already talked about an example of that. The Carson and Walker Rivers
are threatening to flood again, and the problem will not be gone until
the snow has melted. The flood of 1997 washed away levees, choked river
channels, and saturated soils. These conditions make the area ripe for
more flooding. FEMA will be there to help if this untoward situation
takes place. Because of strong leadership and a willingness to make
necessary reforms, FEMA has become an indispensable Government agency
for millions of Americans who have suffered these terrible losses. In a
1994 survey, over 80 percent of natural disaster victims approved of
the way FEMA did its work. This is clearly, Mr. President, government
working for us. The Director, James Lee Witt, should be very proud of
this Agency. I know I am.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Enzi). The Chair recognizes the Senator
from New Jersey.
Mr. TORRICELLI. I ask unanimous consent to address the Senate for 10
minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________