[Congressional Record Volume 143, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 22, 1997)]
[Senate]
[Page S581]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MADELEINE ALBRIGHT
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, there are few jobs on Earth more demanding,
or where the stakes are greater, than the Secretary of State of the
United States. The daily business of most heads of state around the
world pales in comparison.
The President has made an outstanding nomination. Madeleine Albright
brings to this job a lifetime of experience. She has proven her
toughness and her fairness many times over. She has been an unwavering
champion of the fundamental ideals our Nation stands for.
She has been a strong voice for international human rights and the
dignity of all people. She is going to be looked at by millions of
people all over the world--in democracies and countries that are not
democratic--as our voice in foreign affairs.
My wife Marcelle and I have been privileged to know Madeleine
Albright for over 20 years. We have traveled with her and we have
worked with her. I also had the privilege to be appointed as a
congressional delegate to the United Nations, when I joined with her in
introducing resolutions on landmines. I have always found her to be a
person of the highest integrity, the greatest ability, wide-ranging
knowledge, and one real tough ambassador when she has to be, to protect
the interests of the United States.
On an issue dear to my heart, the abolition of antipersonnel
landmines, we could not ask for a more forceful or passionate advocate
for an international ban. Her trip to Angola last year and her poignant
descriptions of what she saw there gave a great boost to the effort to
ban landmines not only in this country, but worldwide.
The recent United Nations vote, with 156 nations in favor and none
opposed, for a U.S. resolution calling for urgent negotiations on a
treaty to ban antipersonnel mines, was made possible in no small part
because of Madeleine Albright's active role.
I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record a letter she
wrote to the editor of the Christian Science Monitor about her Angola
trip.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
[From the Christian Science Monitor, Oct. 11, 1996]
Albright View of Land Mines
The author of ``A Sower of Land Mines Pleads to End Them,''
Oct. 2, eloquently describes the horrific impact of land
mines around the world. Ending the devastation of what I have
called ``weapons of mass destruction in slow motion'' is a
high priority. As President Clinton told the United Nations
General Assembly just a few days ago, ``our children deserve
to walk this earth in safety.''
This is why the United States is at the forefront of
efforts to end the use of land mines and their stockpiling,
production, and transfer. In the last few months, dozens of
countries have joined a moratorium on these activities and in
a few weeks, at the direction of President Clinton, I will
introduce a resolution in the UN that will commit the world
community to negotiating and concluding an international
agreement designed to end the scourge of these dreadful
weapons forever.
At the same time, as the author discusses, tens of millions
of land mines are already in the ground and they go on
killing and maiming long after the conflict has ended. Along
with other countries, we have contributed more than $90
million to demining efforts, and we are working hard to
develop new technology to lower the costs of clearance and to
reduce the danger to those heroes involved in this perilous
work.
Finally, we are helping prevent greater suffering by
alerting and educating on the hazards those millions of
civilians, particularly children, whose lives are not only
under threat everyday but whose ability to rebuild their
communities is circumscribed by the hidden danger under
roads, beneath playgrounds, or in unsown fields.
Whether in Cambodia, Angola, Bosnia, or in many other
places, I have seen first hand the heartbreaking devastation
of land mines and the continuing tragedy that they inflict.
At the UN and around the world, as well as at the just-
concluded Ottawa Conference, we will continue doing all we
can to end this horror and make our earth safe once again.
Mr. LEAHY. As Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright and I will have
many conversations on a wide range of foreign policy issues. I know
Secretaries have traditionally steered clear of budgetary issues. As
the budget for foreign assistance has fallen sharply in recent years, I
hope she will become more directly involved in reversing this dangerous
trend. Secretary Christopher called the decline in funding for foreign
assistance ``the biggest crisis we are facing in foreign policy
today.'' Not Bosnia. Not the Middle East. Not the fate of democracy in
Russia. Not North Korea. Not renewed violence in Northern Ireland. Not
the simmering conflict between India and Pakistan--both nuclear powers.
Not the danger of plutonium ending up in the hands of terrorists. Not
war and hunger in Africa.
No, all of those things. Because we cannot deal with these problems
unless we are willing to pay the price. Leadership costs money.
Ambassador Albright knows that.
I believe she will make the foreign policy budget a high priority and
keep it at the top of the agenda. There have already been a number of
Senators, both Republicans and Democrats, who have said strongly and
forcefully--respected voices in this Chamber--that they will work to
ensure that the administration has the funding necessary to effectively
carry out its foreign policy. We need her active and sustained support
in this.
She is going to have her plate full. I urge her to give special
attention to the needs of our own hemisphere, and I know that she will.
We have seen real progress toward democracy and free markets in Latin
America, but the future is far from certain.
We have a compelling interest in stopping the flow of drugs and
refugees, in strengthening civilian governments and seeing human rights
respected in places where they are not, and in broadening our trade
relations. I know of nobody who would give a better voice to that.
So I think Madeleine Albright was a superb choice. She will make us
all proud, as she already has as our representative to the United
Nations. And I think the fact that we are hearing such strong voices on
both sides of the aisle commending this choice bodes well for her as
Secretary of State, and for all Americans. She will be confirmed
overwhelmingly.
It truly is the American dream when the daughter of a Czechoslovakian
escaping communism becomes America's Ambassador to the United Nations,
and the Secretary of State of this great Nation.
Mr. President, again, I thank my dear friend from Iowa for his
customary courtesy, and I yield the floor.
Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Gorton). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I ask that I be recognized in morning
business for approximately 30 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senator from
California controls the time until 11:30.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. I thank the Chair.
____________________