[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 129 (Wednesday, September 18, 1996)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1640]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WELFARE BILL SIGNALS REVOLUTION
______
HON. NEWT GINGRICH
of georgia
in the house of representatives
Wednesday, September 18, 1996
Mr. GINGRICH. Mr. Speaker, I want to encourage my colleagues to read
the following column by Dick Williams from the Atlanta Journal
Constitution. Welfare reform must be implemented if our country is
going to continue to prosper. The welfare reform bill which was
recently signed into law is an historical achievement that encourages
personal responsibility, imposes work requirements and time limits,
ends welfare for noncitizens and felons, and moves power and
responsibility back to the States and communities. Local solutions to
local problems are more effective than wasteful and inefficient Federal
bureaucracies. As Dick Williams points out, the welfare system is
destroying the Nation by warping the behavior of millions. It must
change and that change is better managed by the governments closest to
the people:
Welfare Bill Signals Revolution
(By Dick Williams)
History was made this week, the sort that will go in the
textbooks. President Clinton's decision to spit in the face
of his party's history and sign the Republican welfare reform
bill means the beginning of the welfare state's going out-of-
business sale.
It also answers a question first raised two years ago when
Newt Gingrich and his Republicans won control of the people's
House. Was it to be a revolution? Or was it simply a modest
counterrevolution--one that would trim Democratic excesses?
The answer is revolution.
After Reconstruction, Jim Crow and the ascendancy of the
nondemocratic elites in Washington, Congress has decided to
trust the states to care for the poor, just as the Founding
Fathers intended.
Three times Congress, with substantial Democratic support,
tried to end welfare as we know it. Twice Clinton refused.
But this president, we know now, will stop at nothing to be
reelected. Being re-elected was far more important than party
principle, the so-called 60-year-old guarantees to the poor
(with an outcome the New Deal neither envisioned nor would
have countenanced).
As we in Atlanta emerge from the emotional peaks and
valleys of the Olympics, the welfare picture will begin to
emerge. The cynicism of Clinton and his spouse, the former
head of the Children's Defense Fund, will be ever more
apparent.
The Clintons know we are a conservative nation. They know
candidate Clinton's election is inseparable from his pledge
to end welfare as we know it. That statement alone made him a
different kind of Democrat. He had to spend three years in
office proving his campaign was just a trick.
In the meantime, Gingrich had put flesh on the vague
Clinton bone. ``It is impossible to maintain civilization,''
he said over and over, ``with 12-year-olds having babies, 15-
year-olds killing each other, 17-year-olds dying of AIDS and
18-year-olds getting diplomas they can't even read.''
Specifics won, stabbing at the national mood. Now with
Clinton's promise to sign the transfer of welfare to the
states, time limits for welfare recipients and requirements
for work after two years on the dole, the most important part
of the Contract With America is about to become law.
``Where is the sense of decency?'' railed U.S. Rep. John
Lewis (D-Ga.). ``Where is the heart of this Congress? This
bill is mean; it is base; it is downright lowdown.''
That is Lewis saying that the Democratic governor of
Georgia and the Democratic speaker of the Georgia House and
the Democratic General Assembly can't be counted on to care
for the less fortunate.
Once the Olympic flame has moved on, the Centennial Park
bomber is caught and the tragedy of TWA Flight 800 is
resolved, such stories will pick up steam. It will take
strong will to withstand the misfortunes of others, but the
bigger picture is essential. The welfare system was
destroying the nation by warping the behavior of millions. It
must change, and that change is better managed by the
governments closest to the people.
____________________