[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 117 (Friday, August 2, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Page S9473]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RECENT RIOTS IN INDONESIA
Mr. PELL. Mr. President, I know we all have been saddened in recent
days by reports of rioting and violence in Indonesia. Last weekend, the
government cracked down on a political opposition group in Jakarta.
Supporters of that group took to the street in protest and as a result,
several people have been killed and over 200 arrested. The crackdown
has reportedly been widened to include other known political activists
including Muchtar Pakpahan, the head of the Indonesian Labor Welfare
Union.
We also read this week that the military commander in Jakarta ordered
his troops to ``shoot on the spot'' any protestors who are seen to be
threatening the peace, a particularly disturbing development. I would
urge the government in Jakarta to seek to negotiate and to work with
the opposition forces in a peaceful manner, rather than calling on the
military to quell any protests. This is the same approach I suggest in
the report of my visit to Indonesia 2 months ago.
The root of the current problems is, I believe, the lack of an open
political system in Indonesia. Two token legal opposition parties are
allowed to exist, but they have little influence over policy. They
cannot seriously challenge the ruling Golkar party. The current
political and electoral systems are designed such that Golkar is
assured of retaining power. But in the most recent parliamentary
elections in 1992, Golkar unexpectedly lost a percentage of the
parliamentary seats. Hoping for a trend, the two opposition parties
were beginning to talk of making greater gains in the parliamentary
elections scheduled for next year, although observers never thought
either was likely to take the majority. This talk upset the government.
Even though retaining ultimate political control was never in question,
the government has reacted to even a slight loss in that control by
calling on the military.
The government is centering its efforts on the Indonesian Democracy
Party--or PDI--led by Megawati Sukarnoputri, the daughter of
Indonesia's first president, Sukarno. Megawati had begun a very visible
campaign in preparation for the parliamentary elections next year and
indicated that she might challenge President Suharto in the
presidential elections in 1998, a first for Suharto who has always been
unopposed. In what appears to be a nervous reaction, the government
allegedly orchestrated a coup within the PDI to force Megawati out of
her leadership position. Her supporters took over the PDI headquarters
and refused to leave until the military took over the headquarters this
past weekend.
President Suharto has done much that is good for his country.
Indonesia's population control program, for example, is a model for the
developing world. The country's economic development has been admirable
and many U.S. companies benefit from their investments throughout the
archipelago. But as the country has grown and developed economically,
it comes as no surprise that certain elements of Indonesian society now
want their country to grow and develop politically as well. The
government's current approach to the threat of a serious political
challenge--to arrange for Megawati's overthrow within her party, blame
the riots on virtually extinct communist sympathizers, and threaten to
shoot any protestors--I believe will both hamper Indonesia's continued
economic development and cause great harm to our bilateral
relationship. Internally, the Indonesian currency and stock market are
beginning to fall.
For several months now the U.S. Government has considered selling F-
16s to the Indonesian military. In light of the events in Jakarta, I
urge the administration to rethink the wisdom of this sale. My own view
is that we should not rush forward with a high-technology, glamorous
weapon sale to a foreign military that is threatening to shoot peaceful
protestors in the street. I am encouraged, Mr. President, by some signs
that the administration is considering holding off on this sale.
Indonesia is poised to be one of the region's most important and
influential countries. President Suharto has the chance now to
accelerate that process by allowing for Indonesia's transition to
modern political governance. He could follow the model of Taiwan, which
transformed itself from a single-party, authoritarian regime to a
thriving multi-party democracy without violence. Indonesia is more than
ready to allow full-fledged, active opposition voices to publicly make
their case to the people. I would urge the Indonesian Government to
call back its military, deal peacefully with the opposition, and show
the world it is indisputably ready for the 21st century.
____________________