[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 109 (Tuesday, July 23, 1996)]
[House]
[Page H8101]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FOREIGN POLICY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of May
12, 1995, the gentleman from Nebraska [Mr. Bereuter] is recognized
during morning business for 5 minutes.
Mr. BEREUTER. Mr. Speaker, the editorialists of the Omaha World
Herald have prepared, I think, a thorough and telling critique of the
Clinton administration foreign policy. I would like to share with my
colleagues that editorial.
The document referred to is as follows:
[From the Omaha World Herald]
Nation Has Been Lucky To Avoid Serious Test of U.S. Foreign Policy
Americans have been lucky. The president they elected in
1992 displayed little expertise or interest in foreign
policy. Still, he has held office during a time of relative
stability. His administration has had to deal with few
international crises.
However, the relative stability that came with the end of
the Cold War may not continue. President Clinton's foreign
policy is an important basis for judging his qualifications
for re-election in November.
Events of the past few days have demonstrated why concerns
about the president's judgment continue.
In Saudi Arabia, the monarchy has withheld evidence from
U.S. investigators about a terrorist bombing in which 19
American servicemen died. The Saudis have also dismissed the
suggestion that U.S. forces in that country ought to be moved
into safer quarters. Saudi Arabia has been called America's
closest ally in the Arab world. This is not the way a
resolute United States government would allow itself to be
treated by its friends.
In Israel, the voters repudiated Clinton's preferred
candidate, Shimon Peres. They elected as their prime minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, who promised to pursue a more
confrontational policy toward the Palestinians and
neighboring Arab nations.
In the former Yugoslavia, the administration has quietly
distanced itself further from its promise to remove U.S.
troops by the end of the year. A pullout anytime soon would
cause the region to erupt once again in civil war.
The administration's bumbling efforts to eliminate the
influence of Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic have been
painful to watch. Moreover, it has been disclosed, the White
House looked the other way as Iran's Revolutionary Guards
established a strong presence, with guerrilla troops and a
supply pipeline, in Bosnia. The administration informed
Congress two weeks ago that the Iranians were gone, but
indications are that some of them remained behind.
Riots in Northern Ireland call attention to the seemingly
irreconcilable divisions that exist there. By swinging U.S.
prestige to the side of the Irish Republican Army, Clinton
injected the United States into a dispute in which America
had no vital interests. In the process, he offended the
British government. Then he made the administration look
inept when the IRA broke its own cease-fire.
A contributing editor at Reason magazine, Michael
McMenamin, has written that the IRA's strategy, which Clinton
has aided by pressuring the British government to grant
concessions, is to force the British to unilaterally withdraw
from Northern Ireland, leading to sectarian war in the north.
``Any American government that doesn't understand this
doesn't know Ireland, doesn't know the IRA, doesn't know the
Ulster Protestants, and is helping to bring an Irish Bosnia
closer,'' he wrote.
Clinton has presided over an unprecedented reduction in
America's ability to use force as a foreign policy tool. More
shrinkage lies ahead. George Melloan wrote in The Wall Street
Journal that projected military spending in the next five
years will be $50 billion to $100 billion short of what will
be needed to achieve even the reduced force and procurement
levels that Clinton military strategy envisions. Melloan
noted that Bob Dole would arrest the slide in preparedness,
as well as pushing promptly for a missile defense and
expanding NATO.
China now has the ability to hit the U.S. mainland with
intercontinental ballistic missiles. Yet Secretary of State
Warren Christopher has been to Damascus 17 times and Beijing
only once, Georgetown University diplomatic scholar Casimir
Yost pointed out.
Concerns exist about how careful and competent this
administration would be in a dangerous situation such as
Presidents John Kennedy and George Bush had to face in the
Cuban missile crisis and Gulf War, respectively. It's
difficult to observe the Clinton approach without becoming
seriously concerned about how effectively this administration
would handle a major and sudden threat to vital U.S.
interests.
____________________