[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 103 (Friday, July 12, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H7516-H7517]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNIONS AND POLITICAL ACTIVITY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California [Mr. Riggs] is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. RIGGS. Madam Speaker, I wanted to follow up on the gentleman from
Ohio's comments. I think he makes a very, very important point
regarding the unbelievably misleading tactics that are being used by
the big labor bosses back here in Washington, DC, in what I think is a
desperate and transparent attempt to help the Democratic minority in
the Congress regain control of this institution. I think it is very
telling and very significant because it is a clear indication of just
how out of touch they are with average working Americans, the very
people that they purport to represent.
Let me cite some basic statistical information at the beginning of my
remarks. I think we know that the labor bosses here in Washington are
opposed to fundamental reforms, the most significant changes that we
have been trying to make back here in Washington over the last year and
a half, since the Republican Party became the majority party in both
the House of Representative and in the Senate.
These labor bosses, again, I am not talking about rank and file
working men and women, but the labor bosses back here in Washington who
have become the core constituency of the national Democratic Party and
almost the campaign arm of the national Democratic Party. These labor
bosses here in Washington are opposed to cutting spending to balance
the Federal budget. We all know that we need to put our fiscal house in
order. We all know that we need to balance the Federal budget to really
preserve the future of our kids and our grandkids and to give them a
future with more hope and opportunity than we have enjoyed.
I think it is important to remember the legacy that we do not inherit
the world from our parents. We borrow it from our children. We are
obligated to create a more promising future for our children and future
generations. Yet those labor bosses are opposed to cutting Federal
spending to balance the Federal budget, something that would, by virtue
of simply bringing Federal revenues and expenditures into line, lower
interest rates in this country and produce long-term economic benefits
for every single American family and business.
{time} 1515
Now, why are they opposed to cutting spending to balance the Federal
budget? Well, because the only sector, the only segment, of the union
activity that has been growing in recent years is Government employees.
In fact, union membership in the public sector has been increasing
while union membership in the private sector has been declining over
the last several years. So they are opposed to cutting Federal spending
to balance the budget because that means that we may have to eliminate
a certain number of positions, governmental employee positions, as we
go about the process of consolidating and streamlining the Federal
Government and eliminating those agencies which are duplicative in
nature or which duplicate a function better performed or currently
performed by State or local government.
These labor bosses are also opposed to welfare reform. They are
opposed to tax cuts for families with children. But what makes their
opposition so, I think, significant is that they are opposing the very
changes that their own members want.
A recent poll of union members in America indicated that 82 percent
of
[[Page H7517]]
union members support a balanced budget, 87 percent support welfare
reform, and 78 percent support tax cuts for families with children, and
those percentages are higher than the general public.
So union members on average support the fundamental reforms we have
been trying to enact back here in Washington over the last year at a
greater percentage than the rest of the American public.
So why are the labor bosses attacking incumbent Republicans? Why have
they targeted incumbent Republicans for defeat as part of a concerted
effort by the National Democratic Party to regain control of the House
and Senate? Well, it is very simple. They have a vested interest here.
They do not want to see government downsized because that would mean
the waning or the loss of power and influence for those very same labor
union bosses.
So I think it is very important for the average American working men
and women to realize that we are doing our utter best back here in
Washington to protect their interests and to create a better future for
America's families because we are not working for the labor bosses, we
are working for those American families, for those working men and
women, and they are the people who are the bosses.
So with that, Madam Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to stress
that point and follow up on the comments made by the gentleman from
Ohio [Mr. Hoke].
____________________