[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 93 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6657-S6658]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STALEMATE IN THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT/CAREERS ACT CONFERENCE
Mr. PELL. Mr. President, I am deeply concerned by very partisan,
political tone that is beginning to cloud deliberations over the
Workforce Development/Careers Act legislation now in conference. The
blame for this development cannot be placed at the doorstep of any
individual or any political party. I am afraid that everyone is at
fault, and that there is enough blame for everyone.
I voted for the Senate bill in committee and on the floor. I did so
for several reasons. It brought a sweeping reform and a consolidation
of a multiplicity of existing programs that simply were not working
very well. It represented a new and innovative Federal-State
partnership in administering programs that are so very important to the
education and training needs of our Nation. And most important to me,
it contained a series of very strong vocational and adult education
provisions.
Unfortunately, the bill that is being developed in conference differs
considerably from the one the Senate passed. The concept of a new
Federal-State partnership that was a key element of the Senate bill is
gone. The Senate provision that continued support for School To Work
Programs appears doomed. A strong within-State formula that sends
vocational education funds to those districts most in need is
endangered.
Equally important, the need for reform is being lost in a battle for
political gain. The lines of differences are hardening, and there is an
all-or-nothing attitude beginning to develop on all sides. We have a
Republican majority in both Houses of Congress and a Democratic
administration. Yet, instead of a good give and take, instead of
compromises in which both sides, we are reaching a stalemate that
literally ignores the needs of millions of adult and young people who
need these education and training services and who could rightfully
care less who gets the credit.
Mr. President, I deeply regret this situation. I would implore both
sides to erase the lines that have been drawn in the sand, and get back
to the table in a serious spirit of bipartisanship. I would urge my
colleagues on the other side of the aisle to refrain from anything that
might be labeled a ``Republican'' bill. I would urge my fellow
Democrats in both the Congress and the administration to refrain from
an uncompromising insistence on provisions that will ultimately doom
this
[[Page S6658]]
important legislation. I would ask everyone to lay their political
labels aside and move ahead with one thing in mind: the need to produce
a good bill that helps Americans who need our help.
____________________