[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 91 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Page S6546]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CUBAN POLICY
Mr. SIMON. Mr. President, one of the most shortsighted policies we
have anywhere is our policy toward Cuba.
The reality is, we are letting a small group dictate American policy
because of domestic political interests.
There is not a single nation in the world that doesn't believe our
policy toward Cuba is counterproductive.
Our aim should be to get the Government of Cuba to ameliorate their
hard stands on human rights issues, and it has had the opposite effect.
Certainly, if we had followed a different course, it is hard to
believe the situation could be any worse than it is right now.
Recently, the New York Times had an article by Larry Rohter titled,
``Latin American Nations Rebuke U.S. for the Embargo on Cuba.''
They are right in their criticism.
I ask that the New York Times article be printed in the Congressional
Record.
The article follows:
[From the New York Times, June 6, 1996]
Latin American Nations Rebuke U.S. For the Embargo on Cuba
(By Larry Rohter)
Panama, June 5.--In a display of near unanimity, the
countries of the Organization of American States, gathered
here for their annual meeting, singled out the United States,
criticizing the recent extension of the economic embargo
against Cuba as a probable violation of international law.
The criticism came in the form of a resolution aimed at the
Helms-Burton Law, which President Clinton signed into law in
March.
A vote on Tuesday on the measure, which had 32 co-sponsors,
ended with the United States, traditionally the
organization's dominant force, as the sole dissenter.
Dismayed by the strong language of the resolution, the
United States fired back with a harsh assessment of the
behavior of some of its closest allies, including many
members of the organization who have supported American
intervention in the past in places such as Haiti and the
Dominican Republic.
In a stinging speech at the gathering, which ends on
Friday, the United States delegate, Harriet C. Babbitt,
condemned the resolution as an act of ``diplomatic
cowardice.''
``What is the message that will emerge from this
assembly?'' she asked her fellow delegates. ``That the
hemisphere will flex its muscles to defend and justify
illegal expropriations, but remain silent while our brothers
and sisters in a neighboring state remain subject to the
caprices of a brutal dictator? Where is our sense of
perspective?''
Cuba was ``excluded'' from the organization in 1962 as part
of an American diplomatic effort to isolate Fidel Castro and
the Communist Government he continues to lead.
Since then, Cuban officials and the state-controlled press
have regularly ridiculed the organization as a claque of
subservient puppets manipulated by the United States.
In Havana, a spokesman for the Cuban Foreign Ministry said
the resolution ``was really a surprise,'' and thanked
organization members for their support.
The Helms-Burton legislation tightens the 35-year-old
economic embargo against Cuba by allowing American citizens
to sue foreign companies that ``traffic'' in property seized
from Americans and denies executives of those companies the
right to enter the United States.
Congress overwhelmingly approved the bill after Cuban Air
Force pilots shot down two small civilian aircraft owned by
Cuban exile groups in February, killing four people.
The resolution is directed against all laws that ``obstruct
international trade and investment'' or ``the free movement
of persons.''
In addition, the Inter-American Juridical Committee, an
independent body that advises the organization on legal
matters, was asked to ``examine the validity under
international law'' of Helms-Burton and to prepare a
``judgment'' as soon as possible.
Coming from a forum that has always done its best to avoid
controversy, the vote could only be interpreted as a stunning
defeat for the United States and a rejection of the Clinton
Administration's get-tough policy toward Cuba.
But at a news conference after the rebuke, Ms. Babbitt
tried to put the best face on the vote and to mend some
fences. ``We have in effect agreed to disagree on this
issue,'' she said. ``We share the same goal, but we disagree
on the methods of attaining that goal.''
Privately, members of the American delegation said they
were distressed not only with the language of the resolution
but also by the manner in which it was pushed through. They
also complained of being given insufficient time to consult
with Washington.
____________________