[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 85 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6108-S6109]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE RUSH TO GULP U.S. RADIO STATIONS
Mr. SIMON. Mr. President, some of my colleagues may remember that
when the new telecommunications law was before the Senate, I offered an
amendment to limit the expansion of radio station ownership by any one
corporation or any one individual.
That amendment was tabled by a vote of 64 to 34.
The other day I read an article by Prof. Jerry Landay, former
broadcast journalist, who now teaches at the University of Illinois.
The article appeared in the Christian Science Monitor under the title.
``The Rush To Gulp U.S. Radio Stations.''
I ended up voting against the bill even though I know there were some
good things in it.
But diversity in ownership is good for all the media. I don't like
the concentration of ownership that is taking place in newspapers, but
that is not a federally regulated entity.
Radio stations and television stations are federally regulated, and
we have every right to demand diversity of ownership and not
monopolistic or oligarchical practices.
I ask that the Jerry Landay article be printed in the Record.
The article follows:
[From the Christian Science Monitor, May 7, 1996]
The Rush to Gulp US Radio Stations
(By Jerry M. Landay)
The surface glamour faded long ago from radio. But
Americans keep as many as five or six sets in the house and
use them regularly. Don Imus, Rush Limbaugh, and Garrison
Keillor remind us that television hasn't stripped all the
glory from the medium or its revenues--Totaling $11.5 billion
in 1995.
The radio stations that CBS owns--39 of them--grossed a
half-billion dollars last year. Like the printing presses in
the Federal Mint, commercial radio stations in America churn
out cash in prodigious amounts. Returns of 40 to 50 percent
yearly are not uncommon.
Multibillion-dollar mergers and acquisitions in the
telephone and television-based
[[Page S6109]]
industries spawned by the new telecommunications law have
stolen our eye from the land rush now under way in Radioland.
A vast consolidation of ownership has begun among America's
10,000 commercial stations. Just two months after passage of
the law erased the limits on the number of radio stations a
single owner may acquire, a station-buying blowout is
justifying critics' fears that the law is not spurring
competition, but monopoly. An industry that once had to base
its license renewals on service to a station's community has
been let off the hook by Congress and the president.
Rita Zanella, a media analyst at Gruntal & Co. in New York,
predicts that eight or 10 big station groups will eventually
control the entire broadcasting industry. ``You control
pricing,'' she told the Chicago Tribune. ``You eliminate your
competition and have greater control over what you can
charge.''
To cite just a few examples of the radio land rush, Jacor
Communications Inc. of Cincinnati spent nearly a billion
dollars in February to acquire 26 radio stations and two
television stations. Jacor now controls 62 percent of the
radio revenues in the Cincinnati, market, nearly half the
Denver market, 30 percent of the Tampa market, and a quarter
of the radio business in Portland, OR. In a single deal worth
$1.2 billion, announced earlier this month, the Sinclair
Broadcasting Group of Baltimore acquired 34 radio stations in
27 markets, along with a group of television stations,
becoming a miniconglomerate in a single bound.
With the purchase of three stations in March, Citadel
Communications Corporation now owns seven of the most
powerful AM and FM stations in Albuquerque's 36-station radio
market. That includes KKOB, which blankets much of the
southwest, and the city's only classical music station, KHFM.
Arthur Schreiber, a former manager of KKOB and a veteran of
the radio wars, predicts that Albuquerque's classical-music
listeners will soon find themselves without choice on the
air. ``It's hard for me to believe that Citadel can meet its
debt service by continuing to play classical music on a
station that cost it $5.6 million,'' says Mr. Schreiber.
The federal government is essentially licensing the drive
to bigness. Station brokers predict that 1996 will be the
most lucrative year ever for station trades. I a deregulatory
environment, small, aggressive companies such as Jacor and
Citadel can become mass-comm players in a single bound, with
lenders anxious to supply cheap money.
But radio isn't just any business. Radio is an essential
part of our civic capital. It speaks over publicly licensed
frequencies to millions of listeners, at home, at work, and
on the road. In the past stations were more than juke boxes.
They provided breaking news and weather bulletins,
specialized information for farmers, investors, community
organizations, local governments, and emergency services.
Before the start of deregulation in the 1980s, owners were
limited to seven AM and seven FM stations, to ensure diverse
voices and dispersed power.
The new barons of radio are absentee owners who convert
their stations from local presences into cash cows for
instant milking, their values ballooned for trading to the
next buyer. The name of the game is to avoid being the ``last
sucker'' stuck with debt if recession hits.
Radio, once the most trusted news source in America, has
increasingly abandoned the role of local service-provider.
Newsrooms in many stations have been cut to the bone--one or
two readers, Schreiber says, ``ripping and reading'' news and
weather supplied to all clients by a single news source, the
Associated Press.
there is teeth-gritting sameness in the music they play, as
dial-twisters who have traveled long distances in a car can
testify--various shades of rock and country music.
Before deregulation, the Federal Communications Commission
required buyers to hold their stations for at least three
years before resale, to ensure local commitment. In the new
environment, a wheeler-dealer can theoretically turn his
station over as soon as the FCC approves the purchase. Media
writer Ken Auletta was told by the head of a station
ownership group: ``It's commodity trading to us. We don't
know [our] community. We're short-term players.''
The fundamental question is unavoidable: Is mass
communications solely a growth game for entrepreneurs, banks,
and Wall Street, or is it also a social partner that
justifies its existence by living up to its civic
obligations? The late Donald H. McGannon, a respected
industry leader of the 1950s and '60s as chairman of the
Group W (Westinghouse) Stations, was a businessman with a
vision who told his staff: ``If we do the right thing in our
cities and towns, the money comes.'' They did--and it did.
The times have changed. But not the relevance of McGannon's
vision. Undoing the damage of the Telecommunications Act of
1996 will be difficult, but it will have to happen.
____________________