[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 83 (Friday, June 7, 1996)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5978-S5979]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY REAUTHORIZATION
Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I rise today to comment on a recent action
by the Senate's Committee on Commerce, Science, and Technology. In a
completely bipartisan manner, the reauthorization for the Office of
Pipeline
[[Page S5979]]
Safety (S. 1505) was approved with a substitute amendment offered by
Senator Pressler. The compromise amendment language was crafted through
the leadership of Senators Pressler and Exon. It was also cosponsored
by Senators Stevens, Hutchison, Inouye, Ford, Burns, and Breaux. It is
now ready for consideration by the full Senate.
The negotiations involved many, and included various offices within
the Department of Transportation. The major trade organizations ranging
from the American Gas Association, the Interstate Natural Gas
Association of America, the American Petroleum Institute, the American
Public Gas Association, to the Association of Oil Pipe Lines
participated as well. Valuable Assistance was also received from the
dedicated staff of the Congressional Research Service. Input was also
received from state and environmental groups like the National
Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives, the Natural Resource
Defense Council, and the Environmental Defense Fund. The negotiations
were both challenging and productive. I want to compliment the staff
from the Department of Transportation for their constructive and
collaborative participation.
The major stakeholders are all in agreement--the substitute amendment
is sound public policy. And this week the Commerce Committee also spoke
when it unanimously approved the substitute. Senator Pressler has
produced a real consensus which respects the interests and concerns of
all the stakeholders and furthers the safety of America's interstate
natural gas lines.
The natural gas industry is important to America and I want to share
with my colleagues just a few statistics to explain why the full Senate
needs to act on this legislation; First, 160 million Americans live in
gas heated buildings; second, $10 billion is spent annually by
America's gas industry for construction that uses enough pipe to almost
circle the globe; third, America's natural gas system consists of over
1.2 million miles of pipe or enough to circle the earth 48 times; and
fourth, there are over 600,000 Americans working in all aspects of this
industry. The numbers speak for themselves--the natural gas industry is
big business. It impacts many, and it has a huge presence in America.
I want to be clear; this legislation will codify a limited and
targeted risk assessment, cost-benefit regulatory approach. It is
consistent with both the Administration's principles and the goals of
Congress. The bill's approach is a practical and responsible
arrangement and is fully supported by the Office of Pipeline Safety.
This legislation will also permit demonstration projects where
flexibility from the one-size-fits-all mentality is permitted in a way
which mandates that safety and environmental concerns must equal or
exceed existing standards. It opens avenues for creativity, but demands
strict accountability. This legislation will fund the Office of
Pipeline Safety into the next century.
In response to past criticism, I also want to be clear; this bill
does not alter the basic statutory structure for the Federal
Government's oversight of the interstate industry. The new steps in the
regulatory process will cause neither undue delay nor excessive costs.
In fact, they are designed to provide better tools and management
indicators for informed rulemaking in the future. This front end
analysis will make government oversight more effective and efficient.
Also the Secretary of Transportation has specific authority to ensure
that the demonstration projects maintain existing safety standards. And
finally, the new funding levels reflect the amounts stated by
administration officials during the Commerce Committee's hearing.
This bill recognizes that new approaches to pipeline safety are
possible without jeopardizing either the public's safety or the
environment. It allows sound and the most up-to-date science, as well
as common sense and flexibility when standards are established. More
importantly, the process codified in this bill will be accomplished by
building cooperative consensus through real consultation with all
affected parties to avoid lengthy wasteful litigation.
The bottom line displayed by the modified bill, through the good work
of Senators Pressler, Exon, Hutchison, and Breaux, is that government
and industry can produce a genuine natural gas partnership that is good
for all Americans. I eagerly look forward to seeing this bipartisan
consensus bill considered by the full Senate as soon as possible.
Let me conclude by saying safety on America's interstate natural gas
pipelines will be enhanced by this legislation. I also want to
underscore that environmental protection along America's pipeline
right-of-ways will also be enhanced.
____________________