[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 76 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H5626-H5627]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                 WHAT NEXT FOR THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL?

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the 
gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Burton] is recognized for 5 minutes.
  Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speaker, this week, the President's 
business partners in the Whitewater venture were found guilty of a 
total of 22 counts of bank fraud. James and Susan McDougal were 
President and Mrs. Clinton's business partners in the Whitewater 
Development Corp.--which is still the main focus of Kenneth Starr's 
investigation.
  In addition, Jim Guy Tucker, Bill Clinton's successor as Governor of 
Arkansas, was found guilty of conspiracy and mail fraud.
  Recently, a number of my colleagues have been raising questions about 
Mr. Starr's ethics and his work as Independent Counsel. They have 
stated that he is biased because of his Republican background or his 
legal work for different clients.
  Mr. Speaker, this is nonsense being put out by the Democrats for 
political purposes. Mr. Starr's results speak for themselves:
  First, of 19 charges that Mr. Starr filed against Mr. McDougal, he 
was convicted on 18.
  Second, of four charges Mr. Starr filed against Mrs. McDougal, she 
was convicted on all four.
  Third, of seven charges filed against Governor Tucker, he was 
convicted on two.
  Fourth, of 30 charges Mr. Starr filed in these cases, he won 
convictions on 24. That is an 80 percent conviction rate. A jury of 12 
Arkansas citizens has examined the evidence and clearly does not feel 
that Mr. Starr is filing frivolous or unsupported charges.
  Fifth, in addition to this week's convictions, Mr. Starr has received 
guilty pleas from nine other people involved in Whitewater--political 
associates of President Clinton, associates of Madison Guarantee 
Savings and Loan, and people who worked on the Whitewater deal.
  Sixth, one of those people who pled guilty was the Associate Attorney 
General of the United States--Webster Hubbell--a close friend of the 
President.
  Clearly, serious crimes have been committed, and the independent 
counsel is doing a good job of bringing people to account for them. 
That is why Democrats are suddenly attacking the Independent Counsel.
  At this point, there are two obvious questions that everyone is 
asking:
  First, what impact do these convictions have on the President and 
Mrs. Clinton?
  Second, where does the Independent Counsel go from here?
  Let me shed a little light on these questions.
  What impact do these convictions have on the President and Mrs. 
Clinton?
  President Clinton was not on trial in this particular case. But he 
was never far away from it either.
  David Hale testified that then-Governor Clinton pressured him to make 
the illegal loan of $300,000 to Susan McDougal.
  Documents presented during the trial showed that part of that money 
went to pay debts of the Whitewater Development Corp. Bill and Hillary 
Clinton were partners in Whitewater, so they directly benefited from 
this loan.
  The defense believed President Clinton's testimony during the trial 
would be a knockout punch for the defendants. It wasn't. The 
President's testimony apparently did little to cast doubts on the 
prosecution's case. Mr. and Mrs. McDougal were convicted on 22 of 23 
counts.
  The Castle Grande real estate deal was at the heart of this case. As 
an attorney at the Rose Law Firm, Hillary drew up legal papers for some 
of the key transactions. Throughout the trial, documentary evidence 
showed that this deal was a series of sham transactions that helped 
bring about the downfall of Madison Guarantee Savings and Loan.
  This raises a very serious question: How much did Hillary Clinton 
know about the true nature of the Castle Grande deal?

[[Page H5627]]

  For 4 years, Mrs. Clinton has been telling the public that she did 
very little legal work on the Castle Grande project. She made this 
statement in a sworn statement to Federal banking investigators.
  However, the Rose Law Firm billing records that mysteriously turned 
up at the White House in January disputed that statement. Even though 
they had been under subpoena for 2 years, the records weren't given to 
the Independent Counsel until they were ``discovered'' in January.
  It was quickly discovered that the billing records had Mrs. Clinton's 
fingerprints on them. More importantly, these records for the first 
time provided documentation that Mrs. Clinton had drafted legal 
documents for Castle Grande.
  The questions that this raises are numerous:
  First. Did Mrs. Clinton mislead Federal investigators about her 
involvement in Castle Grande?
  Second. Did she or anyone at the White House obstruct justice by 
hiding these records for 2 years.
  Third. Did Mrs. Clinton understand the nature of the sham 
transactions for which she was drawing up option agreements?
  Where does the Independent Counsel go from here?
  There are many other facets of the Whitewater scandal that merit 
continued investigation:
  First, the Whitewater deal itself; second, potentially illegal 
contributions to Bill Clinton's campaigns; and third, the death of 
Vincent Foster.
  One important area that I hope the Independent Counsel is exploring 
is the Arkansas Development Finance Authority--or ADFA.
  ADFA was created by Governor Clinton in 1985 to provide economic 
development loans in Arkansas.
  In December of 1988, ADFA deposited $50 million in a Japanese bank in 
the Cayman Islands. I have a copy of the contract that I will enter 
into the record. I have also delivered a copy of this document to the 
Independent Counsel's office.
  Why would an economic development agency in Arkansas deposit $50 
million in a bank in the Cayman Islands? The Cayman Islands are a well-
known center of money laundering for drug dealers. The State 
Department's international narcotics control report described the 
Caymans as ``a haven for money laundering.''
  In addition, public documents show that ADFA was steering bond 
underwriting business to a firm owned by Dan Lasater. Mr. Lasater's 
story by now is well-known. He was a financial supporter of Bill 
Clinton's campaigns. He flew Bill and Hillary Clinton around on his 
private plane. He hired Bill Clinton's brother and paid off an $8,000 
drug debt he owed. Mr. Lasater also pled guilty to Federal charges of 
cocaine distribution.
  Why was ADFA steering business to someone like Dan Lasater, who was 
well-known in Arkansas for drug use and wild parties at which drugs 
were freely distributed?
  Why was ADFA putting millions of dollars in foreign banks in a money-
laundering haven like the Cayman Islands?
  Was then-Governor Clinton aware of what was going on at the agency 
that he created?
  All of these questions need to be resolved. The Independent Counsel 
should not quit--and I am confident that he will not quit--until these 
questions are completely answered to the public's satisfaction.

                                  2000

  The questions that this raises are numerous: Did Mrs. Clinton mislead 
the Federal investigators about her involvement in Casa Grande? Did she 
or anyone else in the White House obstruct justice by hiding these 
records for 2 years? Did Mrs. Clinton understand the nature of the sham 
transactions for which she was drawing up option agreements.?
  Second, where does the independent counsel go from here? There are 
many other facets of the Whitewater scandal that merit continued 
investigation: the Whitewater deal itself, potentially illegal 
contributions to Bill Clinton's campaigns, the death of Vince Foster. 
One important area that I hope the independent counsel is exploring is 
the Arkansas Development Financial Authority.
  The ADFA was created by Governor Clinton in 1985 to provide economic 
development loans in Arkansas. In December of 1988 the Arkansas 
Development Financial Authority deposited, and get this, $50 million in 
a Japanese bank in the Cayman Islands. I have a copy of the contract 
that I will enter into the Record. Tomorrow night, since I am out of 
time now, Mr. Speaker, I will go into more detail on this $50 million 
that was Arkansas money that was transferred to the Cayman Islands, a 
major transit point for drug trafficking in this hemisphere.

                          ____________________