[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 68 (Wednesday, May 15, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H5174-H5184]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                               AMENDMENTS

  Under clause 6 of rule XXIII, proposed amendments were submitted as 
follows:

                            H. Con. Res. 178

                         Offered By: Mr. Orton

               (Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute)

       Amendment No. 1: Strike all after the resolving clause and 
     insert the following:

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1997.

       The Congress determines and declares that the concurrent 
     resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1997 is hereby 
     established and that the appropriate budgetary levels for 
     fiscal years 1998 through 2002 are hereby set forth.

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
       (1) Federal revenues.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution:
       (A) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,107,513,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,165,720,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,214,661,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,269,637,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,330,292,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,392,543,000,000.
       (B) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $7,157,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $17,170,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $16,303,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $17,838,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $19,192,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $18,645,000,000.
       (2) New budget authority.--For purposes of the enforcement 
     of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 
     budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,316,223,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,364,054,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,405,593,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,448,718,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,480,821,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,529,237,000,000.
       (3) Budget outlays.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution, the appropriate levels of total budget 
     outlays are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,313,391,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,352,476,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,388,058,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,428,498,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,453,221,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,501,530,000,000.
       (4) Deficits.--For purposes of the enforcement of this 
     resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $205,878,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $186,756,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $173,397,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $158,861,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $122,929,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $108,987,000,000.
       (5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public debt 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,417,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,651,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $5,864,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,058,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,212,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,344,300,000,000.
       (6) Direct loan obligations.--The appropriate levels of 
     total new direct loan obligations are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $41,432,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $39,420,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $42,470,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $43,895,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $45,292,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $46,718,000,000.
       (7) Primary loan guarantee commitments.--The appropriate 
     levels of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $267,340,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $266,819,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $266,088,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $267,079,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $267,982,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $269,051,000,000.

     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments 
     for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 for each major functional 
     category are:
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $259,235,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $262,484,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $263,733,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $259,351,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $267,996,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $261,560,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $273,082,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,858,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $272,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $265,703,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $272,372,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $269,364,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,178,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,008,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,342,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $18,251,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,682,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,566,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,417,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $18,628,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,838,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,552,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,518,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,030,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,749,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,461,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,618,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,406,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,879,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,669,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,739,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,858,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,124,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,727,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,891,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $20,431,000,000.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,840,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,894,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,841,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,852,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,843,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,776,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,844,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,822,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:

[[Page H5175]]

       (A) New budget authority, $16,845,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,844,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,846,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,845,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,728,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,080,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,033,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,654,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,695,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,050,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,220,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,180,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,078,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,167,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,035,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,109,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,337,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,179,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,141,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,065,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,816,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,174,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,359,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,969,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $37,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,131,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,846,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,277,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,921,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,150,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,630,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,032,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,253,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $44,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,019,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,089,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $44,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,617,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,778,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $7,810,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $5,994,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,663,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,677,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,387,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,765,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,481,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,529,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,808,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,836,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,933,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,026,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,825,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,909,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,889,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,081,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,708,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,983,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,646,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,816,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,706,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $7,060,000,000.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,928,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $826,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,910,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,096,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,878,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,381,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,218,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,622,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,713,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,954,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,427,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,421,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,686,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,015,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,723,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,984,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,198,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,072,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,876,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,325,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,837,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,134,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $199,111,000,000.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,944,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,307,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,651,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,616,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,544,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,014,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,240,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,526,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $17,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,854,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,788,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $17,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,582,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,440,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $18,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,733,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,409,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,231,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,181,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,268,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,024,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,257,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,229,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,556,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,464,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,287,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,315,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,621,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,163,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,365,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,369,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,610,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,671,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,404,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,448,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,498,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,149,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,430,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,496,000,000.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,099,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,302,000,000.

[[Page H5176]]

       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $15,469,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $54,914,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,764,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $19,040,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $14,760,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $56,631,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $55,520,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,781,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $13,854,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $57,968,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $56,675,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,884,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $14,589,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $59,496,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $57,975,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $23,978,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $15,319,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $61,089,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $59,302,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $25,127,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $16,085,000,000.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $130,271,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $129,859,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $187,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $137,102,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $136,870,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $94,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $146,449,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $146,486,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $155,462,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $155,232,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $163,952,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $163,535,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $174,717,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $174,167,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $191,735,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $190,051,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $205,671,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $203,946,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $219,739,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $217,467,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $233,083,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $231,334,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $249,351,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $247,617,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $266,091,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $263,690,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $231,135,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $238,848,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $243,312,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $247,097,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $252,613,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $256,017,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $266,923,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $268,708,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $273,393,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $273,190,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $288,716,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $286,757,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,813,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,001,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,477,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,664,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,220,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,369,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,980,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,129,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,776,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,925,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,608,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,757,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,074,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,570,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $935,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $26,362,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $38,910,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,387,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $962,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $25,925,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,420,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,603,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $987,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $25,426,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,548,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $41,235,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,021,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $24,883,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,803,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,655,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,189,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $24,298,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,005,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,268,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,194,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $23,668,000,000.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,127,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,930,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,302,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,162,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $23,186,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,241,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $23,235,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,944,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,119,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,461,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,143,000,000.

[[Page H5177]]

       (B) Outlays, $22,085,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,655,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,362,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,661,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,522,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,311,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,299,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,149,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,346,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,086,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,046,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,147,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,104,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $282,011,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $281,971,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,083,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $286,933,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $289,332,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $289,032,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $289,637,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $289,162,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $292,873,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $292,190,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $297,178,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $296,252,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$6,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$7,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$7,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$8,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$8,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$9,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$9,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$9,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$43,258,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$43,258,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $7,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$34,878,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$34,878,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,350,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,685,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,685,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,974,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,974,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$37,759,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$37,759,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$39,435,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$39,435,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.

     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Not later than June 21, 1996, the House committees 
     named in subsection (b) shall submit their recommendations to 
     the House Committee on the Budget. After receiving those 
     recommendations, the House Committee on the Budget shall 
     report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out all 
     such recommendations without any substantive revision.
       (b)(1) The House Committee on Agriculture shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $2,082,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $15,117,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $18,852,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (2) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as 
     follows: $367,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $2,428,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $3,026,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (3) The House Committee on Commerce shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: $10,717,000,000 in 
     outlays for fiscal year 1997, $158,844,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $226,598,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (4) The House Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce outlays, as follows: $220,000,000 in outlays for 
     fiscal year 1997, $2,454,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 
     1997 through 2001, and $3,198,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     years 1997 through 2002.
       (5) The House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as 
     follows: $2,600,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $40,278,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $50,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (6) The House Committee on the Judiciary shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: $0 in 
     outlays for fiscal year 1997, $357,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $476,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (7) The House Committee on National Security shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $84,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $493,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $649,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (8) The House Committee on Resources shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: $74,000,000 in 
     outlays for fiscal year 1997, $308,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $332,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (9) The House Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce outlays, as follows: $19,000,000 in outlays for fiscal 
     year 1997, $810,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 
     through 2001, and $885,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 
     1997 through 2002.
       (10) The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $117,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $2,378,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and 
     $3,232,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (11) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to reduce 
     the deficit, as follows: by $14,766,000,000 in fiscal year 
     1997, by $172,990,000,000 in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and by $231,595,000,000 in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``direct spending'' has the meaning given to such term in 
     section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985.

     SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND FEDERAL 
                   ASSISTANCE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) domestic violence is the leading cause of physical 
     injury to women; the Department of Justice estimates that 
     over one million

[[Page H5178]]

     violent crimes against women are committed by intimate 
     partners annually;
       (2) domestic violence dramatically affects the victim's 
     ability to participate in the workforce; a University of 
     Minnesota survey reported that one-quarter of battered women 
     surveyed had lost a job partly because of being abused and 
     that over half of these women had been harassed by their 
     abuser at work;
       (3) domestic violence is often intensified as women seek to 
     gain economic independence through attending school or 
     training programs; batterers have been reported to prevent 
     women from attending these programs or sabotage their efforts 
     at self-improvement;
       (4) nationwide surveys of service providers prepared by the 
     Taylor Institute of Chicago, document, for the first time, 
     the interrelationship between domestic violence and welfare 
     by showing that between 50 percent and 80 percent of AFDC 
     recipients are current or past victims of domestic violence;
       (5) over half of the women surveyed stayed with their 
     batterers because they lacked the resources to support 
     themselves and their children; the surveys also found that 
     the availability of economic support is a critical factor in 
     poor women's ability to leave abusive situations that 
     threaten them and their children; and
       (6) proposals to restructure the welfare programs may 
     impact the availability of the economic support and the 
     safety net necessary to enable poor women to flee abuse 
     without risking homelessness and starvation for their 
     families.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) no welfare reform provision shall be enacted by 
     Congress unless and until Congress considers whether such 
     welfare reform provisions will exacerbate violence against 
     women and their children, further endanger women's lives, 
     make it more difficult for women to escape domestic violence, 
     or further punish women victimized by violence; and
       (2) any welfare reform measure enacted by Congress shall 
     require that any welfare-to-work, education, or job placement 
     programs implemented by the States will address the impact of 
     domestic violence on welfare recipients.

     SEC. 6. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON 
                   CHILDREN.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     Congress should not adopt or enact any legislation that will 
     increase the number of children who are hungry, homeless, 
     poor, or medically uninsured.
       (b) Legislative Accountability for Impact on Children.--In 
     the event legislation enacted to comply with this resolution 
     results in an increase in the number of hungry, homeless, 
     poor, or medically uninsured by the end of fiscal year 1997, 
     Congress shall revisit the provisions of such legislation 
     which caused such increase and shall, as soon as practicable 
     thereafter, adopt legislation which would halt any 
     continuation of such increase.

     SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TAX CUTS.

       It is the sense of Congress that changes in tax laws which 
     promote job creation, economic growth, and increased savings 
     and investment should be enacted and be offset by changes 
     which close tax loopholes and eliminate corporate welfare.

     SEC. 8. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE DEBT.

       It is the sense of Congress that eliminating the deficit by 
     producing a balanced budget is only the first step toward the 
     ultimate goal of reducing and eventually eliminating the 
     public debt.

     SEC. 9. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING TRUST FUND SURPLUSES.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (2) all recent-year Federal budgets, as well as both fiscal 
     year 1996 budget resolutions reported out by the Committees 
     on the Budget of the House of Representatives and the Senate, 
     have masked the magnitude of annual deficits by counting 
     various trust fund surpluses; and
       (2) upon reaching a balance in the Federal budget, the 
     Government should move toward balance without consideration 
     of trust fund surpluses.

     SEC. 10. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING BALANCED BUDGET 
                   ENFORCEMENT.

       It is the sense of Congress that, in order to ensure that a 
     balanced budget is achieved by fiscal year 2002 and that the 
     budget remains in balance thereafter, title XIV of H.R. 2530 
     establishing strict budget enforcement mechanisms should be 
     enacted. Such language would--
       (1) require the Federal Government to reach a balanced 
     Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 and remain in balance 
     thereafter;
       (2) establish procedures for developing honest, accurate, 
     and accepted budget estimates;
       (3) require that the President propose annual budgets that 
     would achieve a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 
     and for each year thereafter, using accurate assumptions;
       (4) require the Committees on the Budget of the House of 
     Representatives and the Senate to report budget resolutions 
     that achieve a balanced Federal budget by fiscal year 2002 
     and for each year thereafter, using accurate assumptions; and
       (5) require Congress and the President to take action if 
     the deficit targets in this resolution are not met.

     SEC. 11. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING MEDICARE REFORM.

       It is the sense of Congress that any legislation reforming 
     medicare should reflect the policies and distribution of 
     savings contained in H.R. 2530. Specifically, that 
     legislation should--
       (1) reform policies for medicare risk contracting to expand 
     the choice of private options available to all medicare 
     beneficiaries, including individuals in rural areas;
       (2) contain regulatory reforms to facilitate the creation 
     of provider-sponsored networks;
       (3) contain reasonable reductions in the growth of payments 
     to providers that do not threaten the availability or quality 
     of care;
       (4) require higher income medicare beneficiaries to pay a 
     greater portion of medicare premiums without establishing a 
     new bureaucracy for the collection of premiums;
       (5) expand coverage of preventive benefits under medicare;
       (6) provide a demonstration project for Medical Savings 
     Accounts for medicare beneficiaries; and
       (7) prohibit managed care plans from charging medicare 
     beneficiaries additional premiums beyond the part B premium.

     SEC. 12. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING MEDICAID REFORM.

       It is the sense of Congress that any legislation changing 
     the medicaid program pursuant to this resolution should--
       (1) continue guaranteed coverage for low-income children, 
     pregnant women, the elderly, and the disabled;
       (2) continue the guarantee of an adequate benefits package 
     for all medicaid beneficiaries;
       (3) provide States with greater flexibility in the delivery 
     of services and administration of the program;
       (4) contain a financing mechanism in which the Federal 
     Government fully shares in changes in program costs resulting 
     from changes in caseload;
       (5) require States to maintain current levels of financial 
     effort to preserve the current joint Federal-State 
     partnership in meeting the costs of this program;
       (6) continue current restrictions on the use of provider 
     taxes and donations and other illusory State financing 
     schemes;
       (7) continue Federal minimum standards for nursing homes;
       (8) continue Federal rules that prevent wives or husbands 
     from being required to impoverish themselves in order to 
     obtain and keep medicaid benefits for their spouse requiring 
     nursing home care; and
       (9) continue coverage of medicaid premiums and cost sharing 
     for low-income seniors.

     SEC. 13. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING WELFARE REFORM.

       It is the sense of Congress that any legislation reforming 
     welfare programs pursuant to this resolution should--
       (1) impose tough work requirements on able-bodied 
     recipients;
       (2) provide sufficient resources for job training, child 
     care, and other programs necessary to help welfare recipients 
     make the transition from welfare to work;
       (3) require States to maintain levels of financial support 
     sufficient to operate an effective program;
       (4) contain effective counter-cyclical mechanisms to assist 
     States facing economic downturns or increases in population;
       (5) include provisions holding States accountable for the 
     use of Federal funds and the effectiveness of State programs;
       (6) contain strong child support provisions; and
       (7) maintain the integrity of the food stamp program as a 
     national safety net.

                            H. Con. Res. 178

                  Offered By: Mr. Payne of New Jersey

               (Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute)

       Amendment No. 2: Strike all after the resolving clause and 
     insert the following:

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1997.

       The Congress determines and declares that the concurrent 
     resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1997 is hereby 
     established and that the appropriate budgetary levels for 
     fiscal years 1998 through 2002 are hereby set forth.

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
       (1) Federal revenues.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution:
       (A) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,140,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,216,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,777,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,345,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,407,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,483,500,000,000.
       (B) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $40,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $67,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $78,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $93,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $96,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $109,700,000,000.
       (2) New budget authority.--For purposes of the enforcement 
     of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 
     budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,338,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,400,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,448,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,508,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,548,700,000,000.

[[Page H5179]]

       Fiscal year 2002: $1,618,600,000,000.
       (3) Budget outlays.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution, the appropriate levels of total budget 
     outlays are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,325,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,391,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,436,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,483,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,525,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,589,200,000,000.
       (4) Deficits.--For purposes of the enforcement of this 
     resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $184,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $175,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $159,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $138,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $117,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $105,700,000,000.
       (5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public debt 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,417,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,651,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $5,864,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,058,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,212,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,344,300,000,000.
       (6) Direct Loan Obligations.--The appropriate levels of 
     total new direct loan obligations are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $41,432,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $39,420,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $42,470,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $43,895,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $44,292,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $46,718,000,000.
       (7) Primary Loan Guarantee Commitments.--The appropriate 
     levels of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $267,340,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $266,819,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $266,088,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $267,079,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $267,982,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $269,051,000,000.

     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments 
     for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 for each major functional 
     category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $240,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $237,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $233,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $235,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $227,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $228,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $223,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $220,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $219,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $216,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $219,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $216,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $200,000,000.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,342,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $18,251,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,417,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $18,628,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $18,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $17,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,518,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,030,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,618,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,406,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,739,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,858,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,891,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $20,431,000,000.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,033,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,050,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,078,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,109,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,141,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,179,000,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $27,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $22,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $41,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $44,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $44,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $7,810,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $5,994,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,100,000,000.

[[Page H5180]]

       (B) Outlays, $10,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,387,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,765,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,808,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,836,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,825,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,909,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,708,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $6,983,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,706,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $7,060,000,000.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,910,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,096,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $5,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,218,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,954,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,427,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,015,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,723,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $7,600,00,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,072,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $198,876,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,134,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments 
     $199,111,000,000.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $15,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $17,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $17,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $46,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $18,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,230,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,187,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,257,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,229,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,287,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,315,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,365,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,369,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,404,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,448,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,430,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,496,000,000.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $62,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $61,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,219,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $15,469,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $64,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $63,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $69,700,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $14,760,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $68,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $66,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,781,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $13,854,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $70,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $68,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $22,884,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $14,589,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $71,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $69,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $23,978,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $15,319,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $73,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $71,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $25,127,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $16,085,000,000.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $140,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $140,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $187,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $154,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $153,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $94,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $168,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $167,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $183,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $182,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $198,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $198,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $215,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $214,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $199,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $198,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $218,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $217,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $239,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $236,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $259,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $258,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.

[[Page H5181]]

       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $282,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $780,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $307,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $305,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $236,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $244,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $253,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $255,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $261,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $267,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $282,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $281,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $283,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $287,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $305,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $302,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $935,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $26,362,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $40,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $40,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $982,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $25,925,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $42,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $987,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $25,426,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $43,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $44,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,021,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $24,883,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $44,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $42,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,189,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $24,298,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $45,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $45,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,194,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $23,668,000,000.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $23,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $281,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $281,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $285,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $285,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $287,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $286,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $286,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $289,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $289,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $293,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $293,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.

[[Page H5182]]

       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$43,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $7,900,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $8,838,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $8,838,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$31,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$31,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$3,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$3,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$32,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$32,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$33,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$33,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.

     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Not later than June 21, 1996, the House committee named 
     in subsection (b) shall report its recommendations to the 
     House.
       (b) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to 
     increase revenues by $40,500,000,000 in fiscal year 1997, by 
     $377,000,000,000 in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and by 
     $486,600,000,000 in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.

     SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND FEDERAL 
                   ASSISTANCE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) domestic violence is the leading cause of physical 
     injury to women; the Department of Justice estimates that 
     over one million violent crimes against women are committed 
     by intimate partners annually;
       (2) domestic violence dramatically affects the victim's 
     ability to participate in the workforce; a University of 
     Minnesota survey reported that one-quarter of battered women 
     surveyed had lost a job partly because of being abused and 
     that over half of these women had been harassed by their 
     abuser at work;
       (3) domestic violence is often intensified as women seek to 
     gain economic independence through attending school or 
     training programs; batterers have been reported to prevent 
     women from attending these programs or sabotage their efforts 
     at self-improvement;
       (4) nationwide surveys of service providers prepared by the 
     Taylor Institute of Chicago, document, for the first time, 
     the interrelationship between domestic violence and welfare 
     by showing that between 50 percent and 80 percent of AFDC 
     recipients are current or past victims of domestic violence;
       (5) over half of the women surveyed stayed with their 
     batterers because they lacked the resources to support 
     themselves and their children; the surveys also found that 
     the availability of economic support is a critical factor in 
     poor women's ability to leave abusive situations that 
     threaten them and their children; and
       (6) proposals to restructure the welfare programs may 
     impact the availability of the economic support and the 
     safety net necessary to enable poor women to flee abuse 
     without risking homelessness and starvation for their 
     families.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) no welfare reform provision shall be enacted by 
     Congress unless and until Congress considers whether such 
     welfare reform provisions will exacerbate violence against 
     women and their children, further endanger women's lives, 
     make it more difficult for women to escape domestic violence, 
     or further punish women victimized by violence; and
       (2) any welfare reform measure enacted by Congress shall 
     require that any welfare-to-work, education, or job placement 
     programs implemented by the States will address the impact of 
     domestic violence on welfare recipients.

     SEC. 6. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPACT OF LEGISLATION ON 
                   CHILDREN.

       (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that 
     Congress should not adopt or enact any legislation that will 
     increase the number of children who are hungry, homeless, 
     poor, or medically uninsured.
       (b) Legislative Accountability for Impact on Children.--In 
     the event legislation enacted to comply with this resolution 
     results in an increase in the number of hungry, homeless, 
     poor, or medically uninsured by the end of fiscal year 1997, 
     Congress shall revisit the provisions of such legislation 
     which caused such increase and shall, as soon as practicable 
     thereafter, adopt legislation which would halt any 
     continuation of such increase.

                            H. Con. Res. 178

                          Offered By: Mr. Sabo

               (Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute)

     Amendment No. 3: Strike all after the resolving clause and 
     insert the following:

     SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL 
                   YEAR 1997.

       The Congress determines and declares that the concurrent 
     resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1997 is hereby 
     established and that the appropriate budgetary levels for 
     fiscal years 1998 through 2002 are hereby set forth.

     SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

       The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the 
     fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002:
       (1) Federal revenues.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution:
       (A) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,092,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,146,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,195,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,244,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,309,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,389,900,000,000.
       (B) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
     revenues should be changed are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: -$7,929,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: -$2,150,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: -$2,741,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: -$7,219,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: -$1,721,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $16,024,000,000.
       (2) New budget authority.--For purposes of the enforcement 
     of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 
     budget authority are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,325,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,374,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,413,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,454,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,496,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,528,300,000,000.
       (3) Budget outlays.--For purposes of the enforcement of 
     this resolution, the appropriate levels of total budget 
     outlays are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $1,321,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $1,375,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $1,408,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $1,447,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $1,466,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $1,498,400,000,000.
       (4) Deficits.--For purposes of the enforcement of this 
     resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $228,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $229,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $212,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $202,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $156,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $108,500,000,000.
       (5) Public debt.--The appropriate levels of the public debt 
     are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $5,441,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998: $5,713,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999: $5,964,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000: $6,204,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001: $6,395,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002: $6,542,900,000,000.
       (6) Direct loan obligations.--The appropriate levels of 
     total new direct loan obligations are as follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $45,451,000,000.
       (7) Primary loan guarantee commitments.--The appropriate 
     levels of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as 
     follows:
       Fiscal year 1997: $172,005,000,000.

     SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

       The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate 
     levels of new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct 
     loan obligations, and new primary loan guarantee commitments 
     for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 for each major functional 
     category are:
       (1) National Defense (050):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $254,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $260,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $229,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $258,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $256,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $263,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $257,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $270,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $263,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $279,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $266,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $287,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $278,200,000,000.
       (2) International Affairs (150):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,700,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $4,067,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $18,624,000,000.

[[Page H5183]]

       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,300,000,00.
       (B) Outlays, $13,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $14,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
       (4) Energy (270):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,620,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $2,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $3,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $2,100,000,000.
       (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $36,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $20,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $21,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $23,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $22,600,000,000.
       (6) Agriculture (350):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $13,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,100,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $7,605,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $8,150,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,900,000,000.
       (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $1,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,536,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $97,707,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $6,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
       (8) Transportation (400):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $42,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $415,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $571,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $36,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $33,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $30,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $34,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $34,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $33,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $35,300,000,000.
       (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,952,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $2,885,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $9,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $8,300,000,000.
       (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
     (500):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $53,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $51,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $21,770,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $19,114,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $54,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $53,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $56,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $55,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $58,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $56,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $60,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $58,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $63,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $61,400,000,000.
       (11) Health (550):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $136,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $136,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $140,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $144,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $144,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $151,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $151,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $158,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $159,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $164,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $163,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $176,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $174,600,000,000.
       (12) Medicare (570):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $193,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $191,400,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $209,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $207,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $222,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $220,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $236,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $234,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $252,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $250,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $272,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $269,900,000,000.
       (13) Income Security (600):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $231,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $239,000,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $37,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $244,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $247,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $255,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $256,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $271,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $270,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $280,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $277,800,000,000.

[[Page H5184]]

       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $296,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $292,900,000,000.
       (14) Social Security (650):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $7,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $8,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $9,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $10,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $13,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $11,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,800,000,000.
       (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,600,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,344,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $24,548,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $38,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $36,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $35,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $37,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $37,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $36,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $39,700,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $39,800,000,000.
       (16) Administration of Justice (750):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $23,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $24,800,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $25,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,700,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $24,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $25,000,000,000.
       (17) General Government (800):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,800,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $15,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $15,300,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $16,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.
       (18) Net Interest (900):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, $282,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $282,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, $289,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $289,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, $293,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $293,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, $296,600,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $296,600,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, $301,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $301,900,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, $307,500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, $307,500,000,000.
       (19) Allowances (920):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$500,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$500,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $106,000,000.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$0.
       (B) Outlays, -$0.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$12,900,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$16,500,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$36,800,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$36,800,000,000.
       (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
       Fiscal year 1997:
       (A) New budget authority, -$43,300,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$43,300,000,000.
       (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
       (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments $0.
       Fiscal year 1998:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,400,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,400,000,000.
       Fiscal year 1999:
       (A) New budget authority, -$35,100,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$35,100,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2000:
       (A) New budget authority, -$38,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$38,200,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2001:
       (A) New budget authority, -$41,000,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$41,000,000,000.
       Fiscal year 2002:
       (A) New budget authority, -$62,200,000,000.
       (B) Outlays, -$62,200,000,000.

     SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

       (a) Not later than June 21, 1996, the House committees 
     named in subsection (b) shall submit their recommendations to 
     the House Committee on the Budget. After receiving those 
     recommendations, the House Committee on the Budget shall 
     report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out all 
     such recommendations without any substantive revision.
       (b)(1) The House Committee on Agriculture shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $2,062,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $14,816,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $18,457,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (2) The House Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as 
     follows: $3,346,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $2,755,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $3,143,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (3) The House Committee on Commerce shall report changes in 
     laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: $5,717,000,000 in 
     outlays for fiscal year 1997, $128,862,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $207,698,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (4) The House Committee on Economic and Educational 
     Opportunities shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce outlays, as follows: $633,000,000 in outlays for 
     fiscal year 1997, $4,923,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 
     1997 through 2001, and $6,040,000,000 in outlays in fiscal 
     years 1997 through 2002.
       (5) The House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight 
     shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that 
     provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as 
     follows: $840,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, 
     $7,236,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, 
     and $9,086,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 
     2002.
       (6) The House Committee on the Judiciary shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to increase outlays, as follows: 
     $51,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, and reduce 
     outlays by $84,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 
     through 2001, and $147,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 
     1997 through 2002.
       (7) The House Committee on National Security shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $79,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $472,000,000 in 
     outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $1,753,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (8) The House Committee on Resources shall report changes 
     in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending 
     sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: $112,000,000 in 
     outlays for fiscal year 1997, $372,000,000 in outlays in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and $391,000,000 in outlays 
     in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (9) The House Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure shall report changes in laws within its 
     jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to 
     reduce outlays, as follows: $42,000,000 in outlays for fiscal 
     year 1997, $255,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 
     through 2001, and $363,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 
     1997 through 2002.
       (10) The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct 
     spending sufficient to reduce outlays, as follows: 
     $148,000,000 in outlays for fiscal year 1997, $3,870,000,000 
     in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and 
     $5,284,000,000 in outlays in fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (11) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall report 
     changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to 
     increase the deficit, as follows: by $1,024,000,000 in fiscal 
     year 1997, and decrease the deficit by $64,619,000,000 in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2001, and by $117,820,000,000 in 
     fiscal years 1997 through 2002.
       (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``direct spending'' has the meaning given to such term in 
     section 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
     Deficit Control Act of 1985.