[Congressional Record Volume 142, Number 62 (Tuesday, May 7, 1996)]
[House]
[Pages H4434-H4435]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OIL COMPANY MISMANAGEMENT AND GASOLINE PRICES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of May
12, 1995, the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Markey] is recognized
during morning business for 5 minutes.
Mr. MARKEY. Mr. Speaker, the political party that once suggested that
catsup should be counted as a vegetable in school lunch programs has
given us a new plan to slash funding for public schools across America.
Over the weekend the Republican majority leader suggested that
repealing the 4-cent tax on gasoline be paid for by cutting education
for the children in the United States. He said if there is a place
where we are getting a declining value for an increasing dollar it is
in education.
That is right, the majority leader of the Republican Party wants to
cut the education budget of our country. And to do what? Well, the
Colombo-like, Dick Tracy-like investigations of the Republican Party
have found that the 4-cent increase in gasoline tax in 1993 is somehow
related to oil company executive speculation in the oil market in 1996,
which has led to a 20-cent increase in the price of gasoline for
consumers across this country.
Now, you are never going to hear a word from the Republican Party
about the oil companies increasing gasoline by 20 cents a gallon in the
last 3 months. Not a word. They are going to keep pointing back to a 4-
cent gasoline tax in 1993 that actually led to a reduction in the price
of oil over the next 2 years.
Why? Well, because they want to avoid some very simple facts. Fact
No. 1: The central reason that oil prices are rising in America is that
the oil company executives across the board, every one of them in 1995,
decided that they were going to lower the inventories that they kept to
hand in order to ensure against excessive cold weather or something
else going on well below their average for the preceding 20 years.
Now, that is fine if it had not also been tied to a bet which they
had, which was that Saddam Hussein would accept safeguards placed upon
how he would use the profits from the sale of oil if the United Nations
and the world community allowed has back into the marketplace for the
sale of oil.
Surprisingly, Saddam Hussein refuses to accept the safeguards, which
would ensure that the money, the profits which he would obtain would be
used for humanitarian purposes within his country and not for a massive
military buildup.
The oil company executives ran on empty. If we rode around in our
automobile with the needle on the gas gauge down on empty and then ran
into a traffic jam, we would blame ourselves. The oil companies ran on
empty. There was plenty of oil in the world. The world was awash in oil
all of last year and the beginning of this
[[Page H4435]]
year, but they decided not to go to the filing station to fill up
because they thought they were going to go to Saddam Hussein's gas
station.
Mr. Speaker, any other industry in the free market, if the Cherrios
company forgets to put aside enough Cheerios, guess what? People go and
buy corn flakes or raisin bran and they are the loser. Not the oil
industry. They did not, through mismanagement, put aside sufficient
reserves, and what happens? I tell my colleagues what happens: a 41-
percent, on average, increase in profits in the last quarter for the
oil companies. Forty-one percent profits.
What to hear something else? Seventy-four percent profits for the
secondary oil companies, and a 799-percent increase in profits for the
oil drilling companies, all in the last 3 months. The last 3 months.
The Republicans want to blame the 1993 4-cent gasoline tax for your 20-
or 30-percent increase at the pump this year, not pointing a finger at
the oil companies' mismanagement. That is like a Red Sox fan blaming
the trade of Babe Ruth for the fact that we are behind 10 games in the
pennant race this year. The Republicans should be ashamed for talking
about cutting the education budget instead of looking at the oil
companies, where they should.
____________________